Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for اكتئاب

Channel

اكتئاب

@Mazreading

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

80,364subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 1 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001342252283
TypeChannel
Username@Mazreading
Description. قناة أدبية – ثقافية– فلسفية . . مجرد كاتب بائس، يسكنه الحرف ويثقل كاهله الهم . . أنا اشد الناس بوساً . . تابعنا إن كانت روحك لاتخشى احرفي . لطلبالتمويل : @Dndoni1 . .
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded1 September 2026
Last confirmed live1 September 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/Mazreading

Growth

80,3641 Sept 2026, 14:45 — 80,364 subscribers1 Sept 2026, 15:00 — 80,364 subscribers1 Sept 2026, 14:451 Sept 2026, 15:00
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 80,284–80,444 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
1 Sept 2026, 15:0080,364no change
1 Sept 2026, 14:4580,364first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 28 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.16%
avg views ÷ 80,364 subscribers
Avg views / post
7,360
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
14
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 August 2026
Posts held20 (28 July 202622 August 2026)
Views total103,100
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken1 Sept 2026, 15:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
443
Videos
5
Links
7

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 1 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Recent posts

22 Aug 2026, 18:05 UTC≈4,080 viewsread 1 September 2026

لماذا تكتب ؟ أكتب .. لأنني لست مضطر للبكاء في كل مرة

22 Aug 2026, 18:05 UTC≈4,050 viewsread 1 September 2026

- لماذا ترسم ؟ أرسم ... لا لأنني لست مضطر للبكاء في كل مرة .

22 Aug 2026, 18:04 UTC≈4,080 viewsread 1 September 2026

عندما لا تستطيع البكاء تصبح كاتبا أو شاعرا أو رساما .

16 Aug 2026, 22:00 UTC≈7,530 viewsread 1 September 2026

الحياة قد تنتهي بأسباب أخرى غير الموت.

16 Aug 2026, 21:59 UTC≈7,330 viewsread 1 September 2026

لا تعجبني إلا الأشياء الفريدة .

5 Aug 2026, 23:57 UTC≈11,600 viewsread 1 September 2026

إلى أين يذهب من يريد مقابلة نفسه؟

5 Aug 2026, 23:56 UTC≈11,400 viewsread 1 September 2026

ما سلبكَ ربُّكَ شيئاً إلا وقد عَلِمَ شرَّهُ وجهلتَهُ أنتَ.

5 Aug 2026, 23:56 UTC≈11,400 viewsread 1 September 2026

لم يكن لي نصيبٌ من الأشياء التي أحببتها سوى النظرِ من بعيد.

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Mazreading. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

أكتئآب.
@Fvuuu · 2,644
#1
حيادر
@llSPR · 19,318
#2
اكتأب
@rrpn10 · 3,501
#3
أحـمَّد ماجٌد .
@ahmed_majid0 · 2,969
#4
آيهم.
@Tooe11 · 14,654
#5
رُوح .
@issss · 36,845
#6
Life Goes On
@lliffegoeson · 1,252
#7
لـ تــومة👸🏻💙
@tooma18aa · 66,588
#8
مُحَمَّد
@ajl1_1 · 17,738
#9
𝗷𝟰
@kl5nn · 1,786
#10
Aizen
@Ainrzv · 11,824
#11
عبدالرحمٰن
@jgti1 · 2,993
#12
𝐄 𝐍 𝐃
@END_X1 · 22,679
#13
شِــعور ఌ.
@OZH_33 · 8,775
#14
هوسَة مشاعِر
@CIITYYY · 4,643
#15
إكتئاب - Depression
@Depression_D · 36,658
#16
لنــَا الــلَّه
@YYY70Y · 1,163
#17
sa
@tvcr8 · 2,105
#18
لِذاتك
@lethatak · 238 (as read 1 September 2026)
#19
هوسَة مَشاعر
@TSSiX · 40,334
#20
Marilyn
@maarrilyn · 3,917
#21
مقالات أنسان مريض
@iliiiii0 · 109,052
#22
نحاول :
@OieeiO · 29,488
#23
ضياع
@v_rrll · 10,950
#24
لحَظة إدراك .
@rrrrriir · 93,582
#25
ғᴏʀ ʜᴜssᴇɪɴ ᴀʙʙᴀs
@x_x3e · 593
#26
٢:٢٢
@OLEIVIA · 22,593
#27
صِدفة🤍.
@iisiis0 · 100,620
#28
H
@h5r66 · 43,799
#29
Miserables - البؤساء
@miserable_18 · 4,050
#30
شَجرة التوتّ
@OPOP26 · 393
#31
Mustafa jaffar
@mmssf5 · 13,024
#32
واقـعٌ مَهجور.
@IENNN · 1,554
#33
نَجد فُصحَى .
@cn51o · 4,467
#34
𓆩 ᴬᴸᴵ 𓆪
@FFUCKYYOU · 7,787
#35
نَواهِليّ
@Zz_am_N · 8,939
#36
00
@xHHHaH · 2,786
#37
متكلمنيش
@fajer87 · 31,275
#38
مؤمّل عَدنان.
@m0i9y · 7,947
#39
- differentt
@bediffrentt · 15,746
#40
أَبْلَق
@lurc9 · 1,604
#41
فيـه مِثلك ؟
@llawi0 · 2,929
#42
١٥ مَايو
@Jlwii · 284
#43
خلف العالم
@k_a000 · 5,746
#44
المُصْحَف
@lAlMosahfl · 773,401
#45
القرآن الكريم
@llquraanll · 248,194
#46
مُصطفى
@m_mce · 1,743
#47
m
@mohmmad773 · 527 (as read 1 September 2026)
#48
لـيكُن لِـقاء
@iilellli · 62 (as read 1 September 2026)
#49
فان جوخ
@vangogh0 · 6,920
#50
A
@X_YJQ · 231
#51
𒄭𒂊𒁍
@algoai1 · 1,715
#52
- عَلي
@FCB10Le · 111,106
#53
غيث
@itsxc7 · 12,385
#54
٧:٤٥
@Hs24l · 1,217
#55
. Sayo .
@IVIVI2 · 277
#56
حَـبوبِـي
@VXFII · 3,169
#57
HAMZA
@GGGGL · 15,707
#58
حـلــم
@Dreamrdsha · 1,007
#59
نَشرَوان
@i0_aa0 · 572 (as read 1 September 2026)
#60
< Storm - ستورم
@HRRRRis · 159,240
#61
كما أنا
@BTOTT · 65,780
#62
🖤 ‏𝐻𝐴𝐷𝑂
@cnv_1 · 38,542
#63
الاستاذ احمد رحيم
@Ahmeed_Math · 382
#64
بائِعه نَص
@Qniqn · 1,127
#65
رَثّ
@c8iiicc · 1,735
#66
WOLF FX📊📈
@Wolfforexx · 111
#67
منصة ابن بابل
@iraqed4 · 3,397,138
#68
نيمار ابن الانبار
@iraqedu · 4,433,600
#69
سنتر السادس | Al-Santer
@santer_sads · 373,878
#70
- N
@GreatDark · 20,016
#71
ميمز - Memes
@JPJJJJ · 91,440
#72
RMA 🤍
@rma1435z · 173
#73

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 1 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

إكتئاب - Depression
@Depression_D · 36,658
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 1 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“اكتئاب” (@Mazreading), 80,364 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Mazreading.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.