Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

كتابات ماكس

@Max_M2x

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

349subscribers

+5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003284343817
TypeChannel
Username@Max_M2x
CreatedBetween 1 October 2025 and 31 January 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Max_M2x

Growth

344349346.57 August 2026 — 344 subscribers7 August 2026 — 344 subscribers14 August 2026 — 349 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net +5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 343–350 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 01:45349+5
7 Aug 2026, 19:11344no change
7 Aug 2026, 00:48344first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 26 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
45.5%
avg views ÷ 349 subscribers
Avg views / post
159
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.53%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 15 of 17 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 July 2026
Posts held20 (26 May 202629 July 2026)
Views total2,699
Reactions total61
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 00:48 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

84 reactions across 18 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 91.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
7791.7%
🔥33.57%
😁22.38%
🫡22.38%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 84reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 May 2026 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Jul 2026, 23:47 UTC195 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

الالياذة 700 ق.م ​ As when some mighty forest is all ablaze- the eddying gusts whirl fire in all directions till the thickets shrivel and are consumed before the blast of the flame وكما عندما تكون غابة عظيمة كلها مشتعلة - فإن هبات الرياح الدوامية تعصف بالنار في كل الاتجاهات حتى تنكمش الأحراش وتستهلك أمام عصف اللهب تيودوريت القورشي 457م They will be dissolved like melting wax (v. 8), a deadly storm of fire falling

8

29 Jul 2026, 23:47 UTC168 viewsread 7 August 2026

اما النصوص الدينية والشعرية كثيرة ملحمة سومرية 2004 ق.م An enormous hurricane, irresistible, went before the hero, stirred up the dust, caused the dust to settle, levelled high and low, filled the holes. It caused a rain of coals and flaming fires; the fire consumed men. It overturned tall trees by their trunks, reducing the forests to heaps. تقدّم أمام البطل إعصارٌ هائل لا يُقاوَم، فأثار الغبار، ثم أسكنه، وسوّى ال

29 Jul 2026, 23:47 UTC123 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

اذا كانت الاعاصير النارية بشكل عام شائعة كيف لم يذكرها غير نبي الاسلام؟ - في الحقيقة ذكرها العشرات وقبل نبي الاسلام بقرون! - الفيلسوف الروماني سينيكا 65م This revolving wind, which always traverses the same spot and is roused to fury by the mere giddy whirling, is a whirlwind. If it is a very fierce one, and revolves longer than ordinary, it ignites and causes what the Greeks call a fire-wind (prester), which i

🔥3

29 Jul 2026, 23:47 UTC121 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

كيف تصنع اعصار ناري في البيت بدون روت، وهذه بعض الفيديوهات الحقيقية لاعاصير نارية / الاسم العلمي لها whirl fire https://youtu.be/UPj6yk2URuQ https://youtu.be/nyaDhxxyUzY https://youtu.be/QlS8kbKjAQg https://youtu.be/DruD_IF9cP8

😁2

29 Jul 2026, 23:46 UTC122 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

ما هو اعصار كانبرا عام 2003؟ - ببساطة ما تم تأكيده عام 2003 هو أول اعصار ناري ملتصق بالسحاب، وليس كما يدلس الاعجازيون انه اول اعصار الناري عامةً فما تم تاكيده وهو نادر فعلاً الاعصار الناري المرتبط بالسحاب وليس الأرض.. وهذا النوع خصصه بعض الباحثين بانه الاعصار الحقيقي وهذا لا يؤثر لأن العرب لا تخصص وتفرق فعند العرب - كما ذكرنا سابقاً- أي ريح تدور حول نفسها تسمى اعصاراً فالزوبعة والدوامة وباقي المسميات تسمى عند العر

29 Jul 2026, 23:45 UTC113 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

أنا ذكرت الخيال الاسطوري من باب التنازل لكن هل فعلا الاعاصير النارية نادرة ؟ في الحقيقة لا بل شائعة! الضخم فقط هو النادر بينما الاعصار الناري بشكل عام شائع.. The smaller fire whirls are fairly common, while the larger whirls are less common الأعاصير النارية الأصغر شائعة إلى حدٍّ ما، بينما الأعاصير الأكبر أقل شيوعًا. A senior fire scientist for the Australian department, Neil Burrows, says in the agency's narrate

3

29 Jul 2026, 23:45 UTC120 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

بل وإن الاعصار الناري مذكور صراحةً في الاسرائليات أي اخبار أهل الكتاب الأسطورية كعادتها.. جاء في تفسير البطري: حدثني محمد بن سهل بن عسكر البخاري , قال : ثنا إسماعيل بن عبد الكريم بن هشام , قال : ثني عبد الصمد بن معقل , قال : سمعت وهب بن منبه يقول: قال عفريت من الشياطين : أعطيت من القوة ما إذا شئت تحولت إعصارا من نار فأحرقت كل شيء آتي عليه . فقال له إبليس : فأت الإبل ورعاتها . فانطلق يؤم الإبل , وذلك حين وضعت رءوسها

3

29 Jul 2026, 23:45 UTC105 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

 نفترض أن النص يطابق وصف الـ Fire Whirl هل الجمع بين "الإعصار" و"النار" في كيان واحد يُعد أمراً ممتنعاً على المخيلة الإنسانية عموماً، وعلى المخيلة البيئية والنصية لمحمد خصوصاً؟ الذهن البشري قادر على دمج العناصر الطبيعية لخلق صور إبادة فائقة للعادة. وأفضل مثال على ذلك الاساطير القديمة ونصوص الحروب الاسطورية - الاعصار الناري مذكور فيهم للعلم - فهذا النوع من النصوص تجد فيها دمجاً لعناصر الطبيعة وخيالاً واسعا في ذلك

2

29 Jul 2026, 23:45 UTC105 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

تفسير ثالث - ريح تحمل ناراً لو افترضنا أن شخصاً كان يسير في طريق ورأى أشجاراً تحترق، فإن أول احتمالين سينصرف إليهما ذهنه لتعليل هذا الاشتعال هما: ​أن إنساناً تسبب في إضرام النار. أو ​ان رياحاً تحمل ناراً أو شرراً أصابت الشجر فأحرقته. ​هذا التفسير يمثل بديهية عامة ففكرة أن تأتي رياح قوية محملة بالنار أو الشرار فتصيب نباتاً وتحرقه هي فكرة مألوفة ومستقرة في الذهن ولا تتطلب أي تصورات معقدة. والنص القرآني يقول : {إِع

2

29 Jul 2026, 23:44 UTC106 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

تفسير ثاني - اعصار فيه صواعق ما هي طبيعة العواصف الشديدة؟ رياح قوية + مطر شديد + صواعق ورعد هذا المشهد يتكرر كثيرا والبشر يعرفونه منذ الازل... والصاعقة هي نار وهذا معروف عند العرب الصاعِقَةُ: نارٌ تسقُط من السماء في رعدٍ شديدٍ كتاب تجديد الصحاح [أبو نصر الجوهري] {الصَّاعِقَةُ} نارٌ محرقة تكون مع السحب والأمطار والرعود. كتاب تفسير غريب القرآن [كاملة الكواري] (الصَّاعِقَةُ) نَارٌ تَسْقُطُ مِنَ السَّمَاءِ فِي رَعْدٍ

3

29 Jul 2026, 23:44 UTC104 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

والعرب تقول سُم النبات وتعني احرقته السموم "سُمَّ" النبات أحرقته السَّموم كتاب الأفعال - ابن القطاع الصقلي [ابن القطاع الصقلي] وسم النبات: أحرقته السموم كتاب الأفعال - ابن القوطية [ابن القوطية] بل ان المؤرخين ذكروا حوادث لريح السموم الحارقة للنبات والزروع.. يذكر ابن الجوزي : وفيها ( اي تلك السنة) هبت ريح شديدة وسموم ... مضت إلى همذان، وركدت عليها عشرين يوماً، فأحرقت الزرع، ثم مضت إلى الموصل فخرجت عليهم من قرية

4

29 Jul 2026, 23:44 UTC108 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

وفي تفسير السلف للإحراق وجهين: أن الاحتراق بمعنى الاشتعال والاضرام .. أو المراد بالاحراق بمعنى الإتلاف وليس الاشتعال فقولي احترق النبات له معنيان إما اشتعلت النار في النبات أو خرب وتلف النبات فيقول ابن منظور: والحريق : ما أحرق النبات من حر أو برد أو ريح أو غير ذلك من الآفات وأيضا: احترقت أي هلكت فلا يلزم من القول احترق النبات معنى الاشتعال واضرام النار فيه ، خاصة أني وضحت أن في اذهان العرب السموم نار مختلفة ت

4

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Max_M2x. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 225,482 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“كتابات ماكس” (@Max_M2x), 349 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Max_M2x.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.