Channel
@MaxDart_crypto
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
954subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002168164799 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @MaxDart_crypto |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/MaxDart_crypto |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:31 | 954 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:48 | 955 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:52 | 955 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 19 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👎 | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 November 2025 to 7 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
DAOLama is winding down Friends, the DAOLama service will be shut down soon. All user funds are safe. What to do before the shutdown: Have liquidity in the pools? Go to daolama.co, connect your wallet and tap "Withdraw all". Have an active loan? Repay it and get your NFT back. If the app is unavailable, daolama.co has a simple guide: paste your NFT address and get the exact amount and address to repay directly th…
#invest MaxDart enterprise supported the fundraising of the freelance exchange talents.tg on the platform grouche.com @maxdart_enterprise
‼️Currently, MaxDart enterprise is not recruiting employees, does not manage funds attracted from third-party users, and does not issue its own crypto tokens. If you receive such offers in our name, they are scammers; do not transfer money to them and do not purchase such tokens.
🪙 Toncoin Name Change — Community Vote TON has changed significantly over the last few months. Telegram plays a leading role in the network and has become its largest validator. The network is now 10 times faster with fees reduced by 6 times. Gram was the name the network founders gave the token in the original TON White Paper, and it never left the codebase. Therefore, Telegram proposes to rename the native token …
The XDAO project announcement the TGE, some time ago I farmed some points and created the DAO in their app, will look where it takes us... @MaxDart_crypto
The perfect storm of uncertainty 🌪 The world has entered a zone of absolute unpredictability. The current global uncertainty index has officially surpassed the records of 2008 and the COVID-19 pandemic. The main difference is that we are not being pressured by a single cause, but by a "cocktail" of multiple parallel crises, which makes any forecasts meaningless. @MaxDart_crypto
The new bot started 0.06% by 1st 24 hours, or ~20-30% by year... @MaxDart_crypto
🔥 FireFaucet: A Tiny Gas Station for Your Crypto Engine (And Maybe More) Let's be real. You won't get rich here. But if you're tired of begging for testnet tokens or paying outrageous ETH gas fees just to move small amounts, FireFaucet is a surprisingly useful tool. Think of it not as a "get rich quick" scheme, but as a micro-utility for your crypto wallet. It’s a way to keep your trading engine humming without con…
Simple CEO steps down — here’s what it means Alex Emelian, CEO of Simple, left the project on March 24 to launch his own B2B stablecoin treasury platform, Stablerail. Under his leadership, Simple grew from a struggling wallet to 2M users and $3M annual revenue. The team of 65 remains. No new CEO announced yet. @MaxDart_crypto
👎1
🚀 Switching to futures grid bots — why it’s the next step Spot bots did their job: portfolio back in the green, capital preserved. Now I’ve moved to futures grid bots (neutral mode, 1x leverage). Here’s why: 1. Lower fees Maker fee 0.02% vs 0.08% on spot. Every trade costs less. 2. Downside protection Spot locks capital in the asset if price breaks out of range. Here — PnL stop-loss (−10%). Loss is realized, but c…
📌 Why I chose spot grid bots Long story short: I’ve tried memecoins, venture crap, obvious scams, and “300% passive income” schemes. Lost time. Lost money. Now I have a system, not hope. --- 🧠 What is a spot grid bot? A program that places limit orders above and below the current price. It buys low, sells high. 24/7. No leverage. No liquidation risk. --- ✅ Pros (why it actually works) · Passive income 24/7. …
📉 Tomorrow’s $14.6B Options Expiry — What to Expect The market is coiling. Tomorrow, March 27, $14.6 billion in BTC and ETH options expire on Deribit. Key levels: · Max pain: $75,000 BTC / $2,200 ETH · Current: ~$70,000 / $2,120 Expiry often acts as a magnet — prices tend to gravitate toward max pain, especially when gamma flips. @MaxDart_crypto
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @MaxDart_crypto. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 514,865 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“MaxDart crypto” (@MaxDart_crypto), 954 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MaxDart_crypto.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.