Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for MavrodiCRG | study

Channel

MavrodiCRG | study

@MavrodiCRG_study

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

657subscribers

+9 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003941312688
TypeChannel
Username@MavrodiCRG_study
Created28 April 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/MavrodiCRG_study

Growth

648657652.57 August 2026 — 648 subscribers8 August 2026 — 648 subscribers16 August 2026 — 657 subscribers7 August 202616 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 9 days, net +9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 647–658 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 17:18657+9
8 Aug 2026, 02:47648no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:14648first reading

Engagement

8 posts held, back to 28 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
70.6%
avg views ÷ 657 subscribers
Avg views / post
464
1 post measured
Reaction rate
1.51%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 8 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 July 2026
Posts held8 (28 April 202624 July 2026)
Views total464
Reactions total7
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 02:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

149 reactions across 7 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
8758.4%
🔥4026.8%
👍2214.8%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 149reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 28 April 2026 to 24 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

24 Jul 2026, 16:21 UTC464 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Путь в баинг через ассистента Мы успешно закрываем все потребности легенд с результатами от 100к$/мес. Нужные нам специалисты всегда принимают наш оффер. Однако бизнес не строится на талантах. Поэтому мы создали успешную систему адаптации менее скилловых баеров. Почему HR может отказать? Читай в карточках

🔥7

4 Jun 2026, 08:43 UTC≈1,530 views35 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Переход из нутры в крипту: Сроки, сложности, профит Сергей год лил нутру по SS. Стабильные $2000-2500 на руки. Понимание воронки, опыт, харды. Переход казался лёгким. Но в первый месяц забрал только ставку. Разбираем почему и что было дальше. Чем крипта отличается от нутры В нутре COD все выглядит вообще 1 в 1 как на крипте. Но вот ценность целевого действия в крипте гораздо выше: юзер подписывается инвестировать 2

22🔥10👍3

28 May 2026, 11:49 UTC≈1,710 views34 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

❌ ОШИБКИ ДЖУНОВ Почему большинство не получает больше $2000 на руки — даже проработав год ——————————————— 1. Информации нет или она мёртвая В слабой команде каждый варится в своём соку. Инсайды не передаются, актуальное не транслируется, тимлид сам за себя. В соло ещё хуже — узнаёшь об изменениях последним, когда деньги уже слиты. У нас десятки людей одновременно пробуют гипотезы и открыто делятся что работает прям

23👍6🔥5

18 May 2026, 09:11 UTC≈1,650 views34 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Путь Джуна: с 0 до 5к$ за 3 месяца Средняя зп баера из отдела обучения 5136$ уже на третий месяц работы в @MavrodiCRG. Мы гордимся этим показателем, потому что половина рынка не лутает столько на руки даже с опытом в несколько лет. При этом мы берем не только ребят с опытом в других вертикалях, но и абсолютных джунов без опыта по фб. Вот ключевые этапы обучения: Теория: • FB, трекер, CRM • Связки: крео, ленды, селе

23👍6🔥5

14 May 2026, 13:18 UTC≈1,380 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

💼 Кейс ученика #1 От кассира с 500$/мес до мидла с $10k+/мес за пол года Жизнь до арбитража - Ноль опыта в трафике - днем работа в супермаркете - по ночам темки для доп дохода Зашёл к нам на обучение - быстро вникнул в теорию - пролился в рамках KPI - вышел в наш баинг джуном Закрепился в баинге - через 3 мес стал мидлом - каждый месяц делает 50k+$ профита - каждый месяц забирает 10k+$ на карман Взаимодействие с

🔥95👍2

28 Apr 2026, 17:10 UTC≈1,160 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Кто мы такие, кого мы ищем, почему крипта и бесплатно @MavrodiCRG в цифрах: Profit $500k+ КАЖДЫЙ МЕСЯЦ ХХХ человек, 8 отделов 3 года обучаем джунов Нутра К плюсам нутры идут низкий порог входа в паре с крутым развитием хардов (понимание воронки, большее количество переменных). Стратегический минус - это низкий средний чек (COD)/нестабильность мидов (SS). Непонятно? Работы много, платят мало. Твой профит сильно сжат

9👍5

28 Apr 2026, 17:10 UTC≈1,120 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

👋 Ты попал в канал обучения от @MavrodiCRG Здесь мы растим баеров с нуля до $100k+/мес Мы не продаём курсы, обучение бесплатное Мы набираем в команду, зарабатываем вместе Интересно? Ищешь подвох? Читай дальше Что тут будет: → Кейсы учеников: было/стало без воды → Разборы: связки, подходы, ошибки → Путь джуна: от отклика до профита за 1 мес → Дропы набора на обучение Для кого этот канал: → Голодные до денег хитрюги

5🔥4

Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @MavrodiCRG_study. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 7,405 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“MavrodiCRG | study” (@MavrodiCRG_study), 657 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MavrodiCRG_study.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.