Channel
@Matrix_Premium
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
249subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002517058975 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Matrix_Premium |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Matrix_Premium |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 15:06 | 249 | -2 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 23:05 | 251 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:26 | 252 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:47 | 252 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 6 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
207 reactions across 16 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5429269365759435574 | 46 | 22.2% | |
| custom 5431472860075943310 | 45 | 21.7% | |
| ❤🔥 | 42 | 20.3% | |
| custom 5431698848370156918 | 40 | 19.3% | |
| custom 5364029976469315203 | 19 | 9.18% | |
| 🔥 | 12 | 5.80% | |
| 🍓 | 3 | 1.45% |
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 207reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 September 2025 to 27 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Кстати, кто смотрел аниме на фоне? (В эдите и на картинке) 👾 — одаа, это ж киберпанк 💊 — не смотрел, но в планах 🌟 — админ кроме порно ниче не смотрит
❤🔥3custom 53640299764693152032🔥1
Ну на спорте 👍
❤🔥3🔥2
У ТЕБЯ РАЗДВОЕНИЕ — так, стоп-стоп… а как оно вообще появляется? Вернёмся в раннее детство, когда разум ребёнка только формируется и оч сильно зависит от внешней среды — когда мозг переживает неприятный момент в жизни: насилие, унижение То человек пытается убежать от всего этого и сам придумывает себе другие образы если такие моменты будут случаться регулярно, то разум закрепит образ, создаст для него отдельную л…
custom 53640299764693152033❤🔥2🔥1
НУ ТЫ ПОНЯЛ? мы – один человек и всегда будем с тобой одним целым? 😈 — Как выражается раздвоение личности или как его называют: «диссоциативное расстройство личности» Гением быть не нужно, чтобы понимать самый главный симптом этой проблемы — ты ощущаешь в себе несколько лиц Причём личности могут быть разного пола, возраста и национальности, они проявляются а стрессовых ситуациях например: — Тебя охватил прист…
❤🔥11
Всем ку https://t.me/druzyacts
Эх кто-то меня снёс хоть не кому зла не сделал ок пойду от до хну Всем спасибо кто был со мной скоро вернусь💋
❤🔥11custom 53640299764693152033custom 54292693657594355742
Бот не работает! Я СЕЙЧАС ЗАНЯТ ЧТОБ ПРИЧИНУ УЗНАТЬ! ЖДИТЕ.
custom 543169884837015691813
Бля ну это 😂
custom 536402997646931520310🔥3custom 54292693657594355742custom 54314728600759433101custom 54316988483701569181
МОЖЕТ ИЩЁ ОДИН РОЗЫГРЫШ БАХНУТЬ? Рякцию по больше✈️
custom 543147286007594331013custom 54316988483701569185custom 54292693657594355743❤🔥2custom 53640299764693152031
Posted without readable text
ПОМНИТЕ Я ГОВОРИЛ ЧТО ОТКРОЮ МАГАЗИН НФТ ЗА НИЗКИЕ ЦЕНЫ ПРИМЕРНО ЦЕНА 2797р БУДУ ПРОДАВАТЬ ТАКОЙ ПОДАРОК ЗА 30% НИЖЕ ЭТО ОЗНАЧАЕТ ЧТО ТАКОЙ ПОДАРОК БУДЕТ СТОИТЬ 2000р ЕСЛИ ХОТИТЕ СТАВЬТЕ ТАКОЮ РЕАКЦИЮ🚬
custom 542926936575943557418custom 54316988483701569183
RADION pinned a photo
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Matrix_Premium. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 688,308 of 1,584,420entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@Matrix_Premium named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“RADION” (@Matrix_Premium), 249 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Matrix_Premium.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.