Channel
@Matching_icons_cf
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
87subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003749675810 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Matching_icons_cf |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 12 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Matching_icons_cf |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 22:24 | 87 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 15:16 | 87 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 12 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (12 June 2026 – 30 July 2026) |
| Views total | 18 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 15:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
2 reactions across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🍓 | 2 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 June 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
◟𝂅꒰៸៸ ⃝ֻ🤩🤩 𓈒ֵ۫ ︎ოay 🌟he 𝕝ight ◌⃘ ֺ۪ ┈፝╾ׄ ݂۟۟ ֹ ۪ ︎ ︎ ︎🤩 𝆊 ➓᷼ ︎ ︎𝐬hin𝕖 🎀p𝐨n 𝕪ou ...°።⸼࣮۫୧ |𓏼፝֟ ︎ ︎ ︎︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎🎀 🖤🎀🎀. ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎🎀🎀🎀🎀 ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎︎ ︎💭 ︎ ︎꒰ۣ. ◟ׂ᎒᎒ W𝕖lco๓e t𝕠 ﮵the ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎︎ ︎ ︎ ܹ ꠥ۫ ׅ ◟֟᷼ ⃝🤩ure vanilla's bl🌟g . .🤩 ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ᛝʾʾ🤩🤩 ٭ ᭺ᮀ᮫ ⋮Mᨡӄִׄe sυ⃪݄۫re to stᨡy ᕱ𑪏ۭᵗ᷒ᰰ ۫ ㅤ ݃𝃣…
Пожалуйста
ㅤ𓏵 ㅤ𝖢о𝗈𝗄i𝖾 R𝗎n 𝗌𝗁𝒾𝗉𝗌 daily cf ♡⃕ 𓇥 Хочешь посмотреть на любовных парочек из куки рана ? ИЛИ ПОДЕЛИТЬСЯ СВОИМ АРТОМ ПО ШИПУ ? 🍯ᅠ⨾ᩚׄ⏜ִ Welc𑄝me to Cооkie run ships confession ! 𝗻𝗮𝘃𝗶𝗴𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 , 𝗯𝗼𝘁 🪽
⁉: эх, никак не могу найти с кем подружиться. . 😔 😨: с кем бы познакомиться..не могу найти друзяшек по своему вайбу 😭 🌟🌟 🌟🌟 🌟🌟🌟 🌟🌟 🍃 🔤толкнулся с такой проблемой? 🤩 🔤е беда! 🤍 🤩обро пожаловать в ✨✨✨✨✨✨ 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 ✨✨✨ 〰️〰️〰️〰️ 🍀 〰️〰️〰️〰️ 🔤🤍🤩🤩аш кф создан для поиска новых знакомств и отношений 🍃 ✨🪽Здесь ты точно сможешь найти друзей! 😉 🎁 🤩🤩аше эмодзи-комбо: 🫂🖇️ 🌟🌟 🌟🌟 🌟🌟🌟 🌟
🤩🤩 НА ➖➖➖ ПОДПИСЧИКОВ БУДЕТ ВТОРОЙ КОНКУРС НА 💜 🌟🎀 🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀 🤩 🥹🔢лин, я так люблю белого кота, но не могу найти кф по нему! 🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀 🤩🥹🔢очу поделиться угарными картинками с котами >.< 🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀 🤩🥹🔢ечтаю познакомиться с дружелюбными людьми, которые тоже любят толстеньких пушистых котиков! где это можно сделать? 🤩 👩 🩵оже задаешься этими вопросами? ☺️ 🥲ТОГДА ТЕБЕ В НАШЕ КФ🎀 🎀🌟• здесь ежедневно публикуется разны…
🍂🍂🍂🍂 🍂⭐☺️щешь сетку по куки рану с тематикой волшебной школы? Перечитал Гарри Поттера и одновременно любишь фандом с печеньками? Или просто хочешь знать, какую бы магию получил твой любимый персонаж? А может быть подойдёт сетка... 🪦🪦🪦🪦🪦🪦🪦 🪦😛☺️🙃😊😀🪦 🪦😇😀😁🤣🤣🪦 🪦🪦🪦🪦🪦🪦🪦 Ты хочешь вступить в сетку по серии игр "Cookie Run", сюжет которой вдохновлён серией книг и фильмов "Harry Potter"? Тогда тебе по адресу! Наша школа ж…
ДОБРО ПОЖАЛОВАТЬ В.. 🌐🌐🌐🌐🌐 🌐🌐🌐🌐🌐🌐🌐🌐🌐🌐 Этот КФ посвящён организации CASSA из игры Cookie Run: Ovenbreak ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ Здесь вы можете поделиться любыми артами, хедканонами и любыми другими вещами по этой теме и персонажам связанной с ней DNI: Хейтеры Cookie Run Бот для ваших тейков: @JadeGalaxyCFBot Наши АДМИНЫ: (🌟|🇩🇪) юми маржела - Владелец (🎁|🌀) Рома - Модер ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ ВП Пост (0+) Буст КФ art cr: @nihil_art on Tele
✍️ 💕 🌸 𝑶-oh ! ❤️ 𓏵𝑪ookies . . and 𝗹ove ! 🌟 ✉️ придумайте хэд на мой любимый рейр.пейринг ! ✉️ они такие милые . . фд их когда нибудь заметит ? ( 🎁 ) любишь рейр.пейры из вселенной COOKIE RUN ? 🌟 𝒀our🤩 𝑾elcome , my dear !
🌟🌟 with The Amazing Digital Circus! ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖Сетка по Удивительному Цифровому Цирку! ➖Модерн сеттинг без детально прописанного сюжета: ваши руки развязаны! ➖Свобода выбора персонажа: можно и за каноничного основного, и за NPC, и за ОС! ➖Вы вправе дать персонажу своё видение и не делать его полностью каноничным: это АУ, где нет никаких копий сознаний и С&А! Всё в ваших руках!
🔤щете сетку со школьной тематикой? 🔤ожет, интересна тема игровой реальности и погружения в неё? Что, если бы обычный питерский лицей жил две жизни, обычную и виртуальную, а ученики и учителя могли сражаться с монстрами бок о бок, чувствуя виртуальный мир каждой частичкой кожи? Хотели бы увидеть? 🔠🔠🔠🔠🔣 Лицей №33 приветствует вас! Здесь вы найдёте: 🐱 Приятный коллектив; 🎵 Внимательного владельца; ⭐ Уютный сеттинг с не…
Бля
𝑾𝑶𝑾!!! 🐝🐝🐝🐝🐝🐝 — Это что, активный блог Кейна? 🤩 🌟🌟 — Ещё и с коннектами? — И совсем новенький?! 🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩ВСЁ ТАК!🤩 Заходи, дорогой зритель! Шоу уже начинается!🎩
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Matching_icons_cf. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 962,880 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Matching icons cf” (@Matching_icons_cf), 87 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Matching_icons_cf.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.