Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

MasterVentures

@MasterVentures

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

367subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001533270001
TypeChannel
Username@MasterVentures
Created20 September 2021measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/MasterVentures

Growth

367368367.56 August 2026 — 368 subscribers7 August 2026 — 368 subscribers13 August 2026 — 367 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 367–368 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 15:06367-1
7 Aug 2026, 00:57368no change
6 Aug 2026, 23:31368first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 20 September 2021the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 November 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

38 reactions across 8 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1847.4%
🔥1847.4%
🎉12.63%
👎12.63%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 38reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 20 September 2021 to 22 November 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

22 Nov 2024, 18:35 UTC388 viewsread 6 August 2026

https://x.com/gunzillagames/status/1859650891412095284?s=46&t=2FIhldhONZzlm2rrq-YjUw

27 Oct 2023, 19:28 UTC956 viewsread 6 August 2026

https://twitter.com/binance/status/1717907778558153125?s=46&t=2FIhldhONZzlm2rrq-YjUw

27 Oct 2023, 16:20 UTC787 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Poll

Gold mine?

  1. 🔥 Yup83%
  2. Nope 🥲17%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

🔥4

27 Oct 2023, 16:19 UTC736 views16 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Fam, we got a $200,000 allocation in $MEME Vote below, would you like to participate in the private round? 🔥🚀

🔥9👍6🎉1

10 Jul 2023, 21:19 UTC770 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Dive into this week's #CryptoCompass! We're exploring the bullish sentiment in digital asset investment, Singapore's crypto market resurgence, BlackRock's Bitcoin vision, the Supreme Court's potential alliance with the crypto industry, and leadership changes at Binance. Don't miss out on these crucial insights! https://masterventures.medium.com/the-crypto-compass-295169f523e Kyle Chassé Twitter: @kyle_chasse Kyle

🔥2

31 Jul 2022, 20:48 UTC≈1,700 viewsread 6 August 2026

The Ethereum #merge is almost here. Set to dramatically boost energy efficiency, network resilience, decentralization, and more, the merge is by far the biggest upgrade to Ethereum yet. Here’s what you need to know 👇 https://masterventures.medium.com/the-merge-a-new-era-for-ethereum-6e36e31f9a0

18 Jul 2022, 12:31 UTC≈1,500 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Nexity Network say: We're thrilled to partner with @master_ventures —venture studio building the next generation of infrastructure companies to drive blockchain adoption. https://twitter.com/nexityorg/status/1546745153704103937

👍1

26 Apr 2022, 10:04 UTC≈1,900 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Cinematic trailer, the fight for Nekovia begins. #NyanHeroes 😍 Become a Nyan Hero & save real cats🐱Play2Earn https://twitter.com/nyanheroes

👍4🔥3

9 Apr 2022, 11:56 UTC≈2,010 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Powered by blockchain technology, #Web3 is set to usher in a truly permissionless, user-owned and censorship-resistant successor to today’s internet. But it’s also got a few obstacles to overcome before it can truly achieve mass adoption. https://masterventures.medium.com/what-is-web3-the-future-of-the-internet-explained-484bb1fdab2c

👍3

3 Feb 2022, 16:03 UTC≈2,640 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026

By essentially eliminating risk and lending requirements, #flashloans are arguably the most capital-efficient way to borrow money. But they’re also behind some of last year’s biggest protocol losses. https://masterventures.medium.com/what-you-need-to-know-about-flash-loans-3364e04ba702

👍3👎1

21 Jan 2022, 17:09 UTC≈2,680 views0 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Yield-bearing tokens have quickly grown to become one of the most popular assets among #DeFi users. Now, they could be set to become a whole lot more capable if #EIP-4626 is adopted. https://masterventures.medium.com/eip-4626-and-the-future-of-defi-675e6a4e707d

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @MasterVentures. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

27 Oct 2023, 16:20 UTCAnonymous Poll70 voters

Gold mine?

  1. 🔥 Yup83%
  2. Nope 🥲17%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 20 September 2021 to 22 November 2024. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,109,155 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“MasterVentures” (@MasterVentures), 367 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MasterVentures.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.