Channel
@MasterStruk
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
23subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002258838240 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @MasterStruk |
| Description | 🚀 Это место, где сливается дух предпринимательства и страсть к инновациям. Резюме: www.omhotey.ru |
| Created | Between 1 October 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/MasterStruk |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 12:02 | 23 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:40 | 23 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 30 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
25 reactions across 9 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 5 | 20.0% | |
| ❤ | 3 | 12.0% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 12.0% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 12.0% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 8.00% | |
| 🤝 | 2 | 8.00% | |
| ✍ | 1 | 4.00% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 4.00% | |
| 🍌 | 1 | 4.00% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 4.00% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 4.00% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 4.00% | |
| 🤮 | 1 | 4.00% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 25reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 30 October 2025 to 23 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Продолжение поста про поддержку бизнеса в России 🇷🇺 Лестницы не будет. Надевайте петлю. Часть 2. Нельзя спасать долгом того, кто тонет из-за нагрузки. Нельзя лечить истощение дополнительным нормативом. Нельзя поддерживать предпринимателя так, чтобы он первым делом думал не о клиенте, продукте и продажах, а о том, сколько будет стоить закрыть то, что ещё не успело открыться. Это не спасение. Это буксировка трупа к …
Лестницы не будет. Надевайте петлю. Часть 1. Опубликовал видео. Человек тонет у бетонной стенки. Сверху стоят спасатели. Казалось бы, сейчас будет спасательный круг, лестница, жилет, страховочная система, нормальная эвакуация. Но вниз спускают верёвку с петлёй. И самое дикое даже не это. Самое дикое — человек улыбается, сам надевает петлю на голову и просит поднимать. Вот она, почти идеальная метафора государствен…
Вот так выглядит поддержка малого бизнеса в России 🇷🇺 Внимательно смотрите на реакцию утопающего 😉 Дальше мои мысли на этот счёт: Часть 1 и Часть 2
Менеджмент как есть))))
🍌1👏1💯1😁1
Поле email внезапно стало минным полем. Я за сильный Рунет, свои сервисы и цифровой суверенитет в коде, а не на плакатах. Но когда обычную форму входа начинают регулировать так, будто Gmail — это диверсант с паролем, хочется спросить: мы интернет развиваем или чиним серверную ломом? Google OAuth и email как строка в базе — разные вещи. Если сайт сам проверяет пароль и сам выдаёт сессию, Gmail не авторизует пользова…
🤔1
😤 Надоело искать нормальную кнопку связи для WordPress! Знакомо? Хочется добавить на сайт кнопку с мессенджерами, чтобы клиенты писали. А в поисках: ❌ Или платные (от $15-30 в год) ❌ Или перегруженные функциями, которые не нужны ❌ Или тормозят сайт ❌ Или с кучей багов Мне это надоело. Взял и сделал свой плагин! 👊 Встречайте WP-NetChat — простая плавающая кнопка связи, которая просто работает: ✅ Бесплатно (совсем…
👍2🔥2
🚀 Помните, как раньше было круто? Сидишь ночью, в наушниках играет саундтрек из Warcraft III, на экране мигает красное: «У нас кончается золото». Ты лихорадочно швыряешь крестьян рубить новые деревья и тянешь ветку технологий, чтобы построить долбаный зиккурат, потому что без него не призвать армию. Или, может, ты фанател от SimCity и орал на виртуальных симеров, чтобы они не создавали пробки. А кто-то зависал в Ма…
Что такое промпт-инъекции? Партия в 4 хода. Дипсик. Вы ещё верите в безопасность? @MasterStruk #ОмХотэй
😁1😱1
🏃♂️ Будущее фитнеса: как в Китае тренируются с "призраками" на беговых дорожках! В Ухане (Китай) появились ультрасовременные беговые дорожки, оснащённые интерактивными экранами. Теперь спортсмены могут соревноваться не только с собой, но и с... виртуальными соперниками! 🔹 Как это работает? На дисплее отображается "призрачная" проекция бегуна, которая движется синхронно с атлетом. Это не просто развлечение — техно…
Channel name was changed to «Юрий Струк / Бизнес, наука, технологии.»
Друзья, поздравляю вас с новым 2026 годом 🎄 Пусть в вашей жизни будет высокая плотность счастливых моментов, несгиваемое здоровье, финансовое благополучие и мирное небо над головой! Желаю чтобы в ваших домах царил покой, счастье и радость! 🎁🎁🎁 #омхотэй
Победа 🥇 Умные дороги получили поддержку ФАСИ Это был сложный и стремительный путь. Мы смогли невозможное. Всего за полгода работы над проектом «Умные дороги» мы достигли федеральной поддержки от Сколково, МИК и ФАСИ. Спасибо всем, кто верил в мои начинания и поддерживал на пути к победе! 🤗 Россия вперёд! 🇷🇺 #омхотэй #умныедороги #деловгору #инновации #дороги #стартап
👍3❤🔥1👏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @MasterStruk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 631,141 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@MasterStruk named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Юрий Струк / Бизнес, наука, технологии.” (@MasterStruk), 23 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MasterStruk.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.