Software Architecture is frozen LANGUAGE. The biggest lie in software: We can rename it later. YES, You can rename a class in minutes. But you cannot rename a concept that's been frozen into: - Four services - Three databases - Two years of API contracts - The minds of four different teams The gap between what a word means to different people is what kills software. Word => Thinking => Model => Architecture => Cod…

Channel
Masoud Bahrami Channel
@MasoudBahrami0
On this record: Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,204subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001136960654 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @MasoudBahrami0 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2017 and 30 September 2020— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/MasoudBahrami0 |
Also posting the same content
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 01:30 | 1,204 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:48 | 1,205 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 07:20 | 1,205 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 27 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 26.0%
- avg views ÷ 1,204 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 313
- 8 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 1.08%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 8
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (27 June 2026 – 1 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,505 |
| Reactions total | 22 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 08:48 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
سئوالات حلقههای رویداد امروز رو از روی سایت مشاهده کنید
سلام و صبح بخیر خدمت همگی عزیزان 📍 آدرس محل برگزرای رویداد: تهران، خیابان آزادی، خیابان اسکندری شمالی نبش خیابان طوسی، ساختمان قرض الحسنه سخاوت پلاک ۸۵ طبقه دوم
🍀👓اپیزود جدید پادکست نگاه دوم بر روی اسپاتیفای منتشر شد. فصل زبان الگوها - اپیزود 2: از خانههای کاشان تا کتاب GoF اپیزود اول را با کریستوفر الکساندر شروع کردیم؛ معمار و فیلسوفی که در سفر به ایران، توی حیاطهای مرکزی خانههای کاشان چیزی را دید که تا قبل از آن در هیچ کتاب معماری ننوشته بودند. او اسمش را گذاشت: نظم زنده. و الگو را نه یک راهحل آماده، که زبانی زنده برای خلق فضاهای انسانی تعریف کرد. حالا در اپیزود دوم…
ارائه روحالله دلپاک در ششمین رویداد حضوری نقطه جمعه این هفته در تهران، در ششمین رویداد نقطه میزبان روحالله دلپاک خواهیم بود. «بیگدار به آب نزنید؛ به AI هم همینطور!» ساخت یک نمونه اولیه مبتنی بر LLM کار سختی نیست؛ اما وقتی همان اپلیکیشن قرار است وارد محیط عملیاتی شود، چالشهای واقعی تازه آغاز میشوند. کنترل هزینهها، مدیریت مصرف، امنیت، پایداری سرویس، مسیریابی هوشمند درخواستها، مدیریت نرخ درخواستها (Rate Li…
سلام و درود خدمت همگی عزیزان ممکن است شما هم موقع ثبتنام در رویداد بر روی صفحه رویداد در ایوند، دچار خطا یا مشکل شده باشید، این مورد با ایوند در حال پیگیری است، از این بابت متاسفیم و اگر قصد داشتید بیاید-که قطعا خیلی خوشحال میشیم شما رو هم ببینیم❤️، لطفا پیام بفرستید تا بتوانیم با در نظر گرفتن ظرفیت و اولویت اطلاع رسانی خدمت همگی شما عزیزان باشیم. متاسفانه بدلیل ظرفیت محدود فقط 5-6 جای خالی داریم
⬤ بعد از مدتها، «نقطه» دوباره برگزار میشود. این بار با یک سؤال مهم: اگر امروز دوباره قرار بود مسیرمان را در دنیای نرمافزار شروع کنیم، چه چیزهایی را متفاوت انتخاب میکردیم؟ دنیای مهندسی نرمافزار در حال تغییر پارادایمی بزرگ است. AI کد مینویسد، تست تولید میکند و کنار ما در تصمیمهای فنی قرار گرفته است. اما سؤال اصلی شاید دیگر این نباشد که: از چه ابزاری استفاده کنیم؟ بلکه: چه چیزهایی را باید عمیق یاد گرفت؟ چه چ…
A few years ago, someone asked me a question after one of my talks: When do you think software architecture actually begins? At the time, I gave the same answer most of us probably would: Requirements, models, boundaries, services... Today, I don't think that's true anymore. The more systems I worked on, the more I became convinced that architecture quietly starts much earlier, long before the first service is ext…
چند روز پیش، در مورد Office Hours و جلسات Mock Interview نوشتم و استقبال خیلی عالی از این اتفاق شد. از همهی شما که وقت گذاشتید و apply کردید، صمیمانه سپاسگزارم. --- 📌 یک خبر خوب: اولین دور جلسات Office Hours برای این آخر هفته برنامهریزی شده و گروه اول، جلسات خودشون رو پیش رو دارن. با بقیهی دوستانی هم که درخواست دادن، بهتدریج و طی هفتههای آینده ارتباط خواهیم گرفت. --- ⚠️ متاسفانه متوجه شدم که برخی از ایمیلهای…
📢 Update: PDF for Every Chapter Each chapter of Language-Driven Design Part I now has its own PDF download. You can now: - Download individual chapters - Read offline - Print or annotate - Share with your team All free. No sign-up required. 📖 https://masoudbahrami.com/ldd/book 🌱If you found the book useful, please share it with others who might benefit. The more people we reach, the better the conversation becom…
Features vs. Futures: Software Design in the Age of AI by Kent Beck at ShipSummit Software pioneer Kent Beck delivers a candid talk on one of the most pressing problems in AI-assisted development: why codebases decay faster than ever when you let the "genie" run unchecked. Using a simple but powerful features-vs-futures framework, Kent explains how every new feature trades away future optionality, and how the spac…
Today, I'm happy to share the first public release. Language-Driven Design, Part I is now available to read online and download for free. This preview edition contains the complete foundation of the philosophy of LDD: 🟢 10 chapters 🟡 The core concepts behind LDD If you think this is another book about Ubiquitous Language or simply another interpretation of Domain-Driven Design, I think you'll be surprised.😮 Langu…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @MasoudBahrami0. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 263,305 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Masoud Bahrami Channel” (@MasoudBahrami0), 1,204 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MasoudBahrami0.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.