Channel
@MashaProbusiness
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
279subscribers
+7 since we began measuring on 29 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001636351921 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @MashaProbusiness |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 29 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/MashaProbusiness |
Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 46% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Nov 2026, 08:01 | 279 | +4 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 18:05 | 275 | +1 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 19:31 | 274 | +1 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 00:59 | 273 | +1 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 06:57 | 272 | no change |
| 29 Sept 2026, 01:22 | 272 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 25 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
16 reactions across 6 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👏 | 6 | 37.5% | |
| ❤🔥 | 5 | 31.3% | |
| ❤ | 3 | 18.8% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 6.25% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 6.25% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 16 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 25 September 2026 to 28 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Счастье и мелкие радости приходят к вам только после того, как вы принимаете смерть. Но если вы жадно высматриваете все, ради чего вы еще можете жить, тогда ничто не будет достаточным для вашего удовольствия и незначительные вещи, что по-прежнему окружают вас, прекращают радовать. Поэтому я вглядываюсь в смерть – она учит меня жизни. Карл Густав Юнг
❤🔥5
Аудио для прогулок. Выпуск №16 ▪️ «Сезам и Лилии» Джон Рескин Яндекс.Книги Лекции великого искусствоведа и моралиста о том, как смотреть на мир и зачем вообще нужно искусство. Викторианская строгость, неожиданная нежность и очень современные вопросы. ▪️ «Фрэнк Синатра простудился и другие истории» Гэй Тализ Литрес Легендарный журналист и его лучшие тексты: о Синатре, о кухнях, о Нью-Йорке, о людях, которые делают…
❤2
Девушки давайте прослушаем и обсудим «Почему так важно бессмысленно шляться»
👌1
Но вернемся к деньгам
«Тургеневу платят 800 рублей за лист, а мне 200. Я понимаю, что пишу хуже Тургенева, но, Миша, не в четыре же раза хуже!» Из письма Достоевского брату
👏6
Это очень смешно
Фотография для рекламной кампании “Versace Eyewear”. 1994. Ричард Аведон.1923-2004.
🔥1
В своей статье 1990 года японский архитектор Хироси Хара(1936-2025)описал здание Yamato International Building, чьё строительство по его проекту завершилось в Токио в 1987 году, как “спроектированное на основе концепции „деревни в архитектуре“”. Он, также охарактеризовал офисное здание как “сплошную конструкцию, состоящую из двенадцати слоев, каждый из которых частично обрезан”, а фасад, как “комбинацию двух разных п…
❤1
Если человек регулярно делегирует ИИ творческие или аналитические задачи, какие нейрофизиологические процессы могут меняться со временем? Представьте: студент весь семестр писал эссе с помощью чата, и к экзамену он садится за чистый лист, чувствуя, что знакомые аргументы рассыпаются. Мысли присутствуют, связный текст при этом не собирается. Навык самостоятельно формулировать мысль в письме у него не натренировался. …
И вот вам ещё «на подумать»👇👇👇
От родителей на собеседованиях в наш образовательный центр Самолёт стало больше запросов на обучение детей работе с ИИ. Самое интересное, что по младшей школе. Спрашиваю: А зачем это ребёнку? Отвечают: Ну всё вокруг только об этом и говорят. Это - говорю - Хорошо. Но зачем? Упустит свой шанс - отвечают Ну пример приведите какой-нибудь упущенного шанса. Ну, например - говорят. - Не сможет отличить картинку, сдел…
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @MashaProbusiness. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“МашаПРОбизнес” (@MashaProbusiness), 279 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MashaProbusiness.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.