The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 17 months. If they remain inactive for the next 27 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.

Channel
MASAO CALLS π²
@MasaoCalls
On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Handles named that no longer answer Β· Cite this entry
12subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001805625753 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @MasaoCalls |
| Description | Everything here is not financial advise, so please do your own research, ape always what you can affort to loose. For promo contact: @masao_owner Scout: @Ebbypro_87 |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 19 December 2022β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/MasaoCalls |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 05:31 | 12 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:25 | 12 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 19 December 2022 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 August 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 23
- Videos
- 2
- Links
- 35
Lifetime counters from Telegramβs own channel header, read 12 August 2026 β not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegramβs rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 18s
- Average length
- 18s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel β not this channelβs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramβs own rounded chrome, so it carries no β mark.
Reaction mix
29 reactions across 10 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| π₯ | 8 | 27.6% | |
| π | 4 | 13.8% | |
| π | 4 | 13.8% | |
| π | 3 | 10.3% | |
| β‘ | 2 | 6.90% | |
| β€ | 2 | 6.90% | |
| β€βπ₯ | 1 | 3.45% | |
| πΎ | 1 | 3.45% | |
| π© | 1 | 3.45% | |
| π’ | 1 | 3.45% | |
| π€© | 1 | 3.45% | |
| π₯° | 1 | 3.45% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 29reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 December 2022 to 14 August 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
REFUND Buy! ππ΅ππ΅ππ΅ππ΅ππ΅ππ΅ππ΅ππ΅ππ΅ππ΅ππ΅ππ΅ππ΅ππ΅ππ΅ππ΅ππ΅ππ΅ππ΅ππ΅ππ΅ππ΅ππ΅ππ΅ππ΅ππ΅ππ΅ππ΅ π΅ 0.137 BNB ($28.49) πͺ 281,961,810 REFUND πΈ 0xe447β¦838b | Txn β New Holder πΌ Market Cap $1,020 π¦ Chart β¨ Trade β Events πΈ Trending
Signed πMasao | MasaoCalls
BIT PEPE Buy! πΈπΈπΈπΈπΈπΈπΈπΈπΈπΈπΈπΈπΈπΈπΈπΈ π΅ 0.05 ETH ($83.02) πͺ 3,265,031 BPEPE πΉ 0xa16eβ¦dc13 | Txn β New Holder πΌ Market Cap $2,615 π₯ Chart β¨ Trade π« Snipe πΉ Trending πΉ Trending π₯ ETH TRENDING
Signed πMasao | MasaoCalls
HarryPotterSminemTrumpHomerSimpson777Inu Buy! π· π΅ 0.001 ETH ($1.84) πͺ 377,922 ETH πͺͺ 0x48ffβ¦7ecb | Txn β New Holder πΌ Market Cap $2,040 π₯ Chart β Events π΅ Trending
Signed His Sister
Miladys Gem Base Buy! π’π’π’π’π’π’π’ Spent: 0.02 WETH ($36.66) Got: 8,282,772,171.29 MGB Buyer Position: β¬οΈ 58.00%! Buyer Holdings: 22,563,686,903.67 MGB ($99.43) Buyer Funds: $197.62 DEX: SushiSwap Price: 0.000000000002404 WETH ($0.000000004407) MarketCap: $1,854 TX | Swap | Chart | Trending Telegram
Signed πMasao | MasaoCalls
Miladys Gem Base Buy! π’π’π’π’π’π’π’ Spent: 0.02 WETH ($36.66) Got: 8,282,772,171.29 MGB Buyer Position: β¬οΈ 58.00%! Buyer Holdings: 22,563,686,903.67 MGB ($99.43) Buyer Funds: $197.62 DEX: SushiSwap Price: 0.000000000002404 WETH ($0.000000004407) MarketCap: $1,854 TX | Swap | Chart | Trending Telegram
Signed His Sister
Hey guys, i just aped this one!
Signed πMasao | MasaoCalls
PEPEZILLA Buy! πΈπβπΈπβπΈπβπΈπβπΈπβπΈπβπΈπβπΈπβπΈπβπΈπβπΈπβπΈπβπΈπβπΈπβπΈπβπΈπβπΈπβπΈπβπΈπβπΈπβπΈπβ π΅ 0.07 BNB ($21.82) πͺ 75,584,951,925 PEPEZ πΈ 0x3661β¦e750 | Txn πΌ Position +41.13% πΌ Market Cap $2,477 π₯ Chart β¨ Trade π’ Events πΈ Trending
Signed πMasao | MasaoCalls
Just opened my tg after 7 days and saw this happen, just beautiful chart...
π₯1
Signed πMasao | MasaoCalls
AI DEV Buy! π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€β¦
πΎ1
Signed πMasao | MasaoCalls
https://poocoin.app/tokens/0x31aef016a16a669bef148dfa6f1c892b7715620e 7/11% Currently at 30k, seems like its reversing from a bottom dip, may do something.. Tg: @cryptonomicsofficial
π₯4β‘2β€βπ₯1
Signed πMasao | MasaoCalls
Bussy asf recently family... I will call 1 token i like for the culture... Any Gem i should check?π
π2
Signed πMasao | MasaoCalls
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @MasaoCalls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank β 428,884 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below β republished posts weigh more than named mentions β and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelβs name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page β a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 8
- handles named in this channelβs posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 8
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@MasaoCalls named 8 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handleβs history β see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today β not that anything βdiedβ. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel β we have no record it ever was one.
named in 2 posts, 13 August 2026 β 13 August 2026
named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 β 13 August 2026
named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 β 13 August 2026
named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 β 13 August 2026
named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 β 13 August 2026
named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 β 13 August 2026
named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 β 13 August 2026
named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 β 13 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βMASAO CALLS π²β (@MasaoCalls), 12 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MasaoCalls.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.