Channel
@Mary_Che28
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
164subscribers
-8 since we began measuring on 1 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001738865749 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Mary_Che28 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 1 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Mary_Che28 |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 27 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 83% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Nov 2026, 02:08 | 164 | -1 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 16:17 | 165 | -3 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 17:45 | 168 | -2 |
| 9 Oct 2026, 03:38 | 170 | +1 |
| 27 Sept 2026, 18:38 | 169 | -1 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 17:15 | 170 | -2 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 08:47 | 172 | no change |
| 1 Sept 2026, 20:15 | 172 | first reading |
5 posts held, back to 19 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
86 reactions across 5 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5321321951254308116 | 26 | 30.2% | |
| custom 5222104384195806913 | 13 | 15.1% | |
| custom 5332493844091008877 | 12 | 14.0% | |
| custom 5343539447709318307 | 9 | 10.5% | |
| custom 5305496684690683539 | 8 | 9.30% | |
| custom 5244898978226525464 | 7 | 8.14% | |
| custom 5413647508846962365 | 5 | 5.81% | |
| custom 5467688724395473407 | 5 | 5.81% | |
| custom 5330287403426923776 | 1 | 1.16% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 86 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 19 March 2026 to 23 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Сев за руль Матиза 2005 года со сломанным кондиционером, они умчали в поля под плейлист мечты, спрятавшийся под кассетой с символической обложкой “Titanic”
custom 52221043841958069139custom 53213219512543081163custom 53324938440910088773
color accent
custom 53324938440910088779custom 53213219512543081167custom 54136475088469623655custom 53054966846906835391custom 53302874034269237761
❤️
custom 532132195125430811610custom 53054966846906835395custom 52221043841958069134
Good morning ☕️💄 Кейт Бланшетт среди картин коллекционера Ивора Браки - на обложке нового немецкого VOGUE April 📓 Ph by: Николай фон Бисмарк
custom 54676887243954734075custom 53054966846906835392
Happy birthday! Happy 18! Мой самый нежный, самый близкий человек 🎀💐
custom 53435394477093183079custom 52448989782265254647custom 53213219512543081166
Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @Mary_Che28. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝐌𝐚𝐫𝐲 𝐋𝐨𝐯𝐞” (@Mary_Che28), 164 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Mary_Che28.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.