Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Отзывы 📿

@Marulamun_feedback

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

8subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002206976465
TypeChannel
Username@Marulamun_feedback
DescriptionВсе отзывы по моим консультациям 📖 Канал: https://t.me/diplomatic_therapy Запись в личку: @Marulamun
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/Marulamun_feedback

Growth

87 August 2026 — 8 subscribers12 August 2026 — 8 subscribers7 August 202612 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 5 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7–9 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 14:468no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:118first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 23 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2975.0%
avg views ÷ 8 subscribers
Avg views / post
238
1 post measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
1
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 July 2026
Posts held20 (23 January 202624 July 2026)
Views total238
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 14:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Recent posts

24 Jul 2026, 15:29 UTC238 viewsread 12 August 2026

Маша , благодарю за помощь !!! с тобой приходит равновесие... наполнение...❤️❤️❤️ Деликатно и старательно делаешь своё дело...🙏😇👍👍 До связи!!!

12 Jul 2026, 06:08 UTC10 viewsread 12 August 2026

Маша!!! Я третий день пытаюсь тебе написать про это! Помнишь мы последние две работы делали на то что я не хочу ничего? Ни денег ни вообще нифига Я ЗАХОТЕЛА ДЕНЕГ И ВСЕ ЗАХОТЕЛА Плюс у меня сны наконец вернулись и я их запоминаю!!! Результат за неделю! Блин я так Рада! Я чуть не заплакала когда поймала себя на мысли что ХОЧУ ДЕНЕГ не просто потому что так принято а потому что ну вот я хочу!!

5 Jul 2026, 11:57 UTC10 viewsread 12 August 2026

Маша, спасибо большое за сегодняшние исцеляющие работы, много осознаний и хорошего настроения🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩

5 Jul 2026, 11:57 UTC10 viewsread 12 August 2026

Маша, спасибо тебе большое) Было очень интересно и ценно для меня) вступать в контакт со своей уязвимостью и своими слабостями не просто. Спасибо, что создаешь поле в котором можно по чуть-чуть исцеляться)

5 Jul 2026, 11:57 UTC9 viewsread 12 August 2026

Маша, спасибо тебе ГИГАНТСКОЕ совсем по-другому работы разворачиваются и проходят Если я себя ранлше чувствовала будто еду в открытых санках по камням, то сейчас я как будто выехала на ровную дорогу Благодарю за всё что ты делаешь 🤩

29 Jun 2026, 13:33 UTC6 viewsread 12 August 2026

Маша, спасибо большое за глубину , за легкость. Очень нравится твое поле ❤️‍🔥

29 Jun 2026, 13:33 UTC6 viewsread 12 August 2026

Маша, спасибо большое. Потрясающие работы и энергетика. ❤️

29 Jun 2026, 13:32 UTC6 viewsread 12 August 2026

Мария, благодарю за бережное, чуткое отношение, за смыслы, за желание идти дальше в развитие. Сегодня такое ласковое и нежное поле, энергия. Благодарю всех кто приходил и помогал🙏

29 Jun 2026, 13:32 UTC5 viewsread 12 August 2026

Маша, огромная благодарность за терапию, чувствую как появляется свобода в действиях что ли, ночью такие процессы сильные шли, жарило, какие то идеи приходили, так интересно 🙏, у меня даже получилось про себя написать в канале, вот что шло, все слова твои прямо в самое сердечко ♥️😘 спасибо большое за терапевтическую группу онлайн, девочек за их истории, многое откликалось🤗 про форму контакта и ответственность очень п

29 Jun 2026, 13:31 UTC4 viewsread 12 August 2026

Мари, благодарю тебя за вчерашний день! За твой вклад в нас! За красивые и глубокие работы! Глубина и смыслы 🫶🏻 прямо в точку и сердце. Отдельная благодарность за мою работу. Как ты почувствовала меня поняла и прошли все мои грани запроса. Филигранно и точно! Ты стала очень сильным терапевтом и это только начало. Благодарю за все и Слава Богу, что есть Терапия Души!

29 Jun 2026, 13:30 UTC4 viewsread 12 August 2026

Маша, привет! Хочу поблагодарить тебя еще раз за работы, которые ты мне сделала 💞 Настолько все глубинно и пока еще не проявлено в материи, но ощутимо в теле Я как будто поднялась на 10 ступеней вверх в другую реальность И многое и многие остались там, а я здесь Как скинула балласт ненужного в моей Жизни 🍀 Благодарю тебя от всего Сердца♥️ Восхищаюсь тобой и твоими работами🍀

29 Jun 2026, 13:29 UTC3 viewsread 12 August 2026

Маша, хочу выразить тебе огромную благодарность за работу оффлайн в марте месяце. У меня наконец-то все прогрузилось и стала ощущать это внутреннее соединение. Знаешь, наверное этот отзыв будет больше призыв к тому, чтобы ты дальше шла этим путем Чтобы ты понимала и чувствовала свой внутренний потенциал и ресурс То что ты делаешь сильно и красиво 😍 Благодарю тебя за вклад в мою жизнь и других людей ♥️ Иди и наслаждай

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Marulamun_feedback. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 571,605 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Отзывы 📿” (@Marulamun_feedback), 8 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Marulamun_feedback.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.