Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Мари Астапенко | Статус в теле

Channel

Мари Астапенко | Статус в теле

@MariaAstapenko

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry

258subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002477403785
TypeChannel
Username@MariaAstapenko
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live23 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 23 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/MariaAstapenko

Growth

255258256.57 August 2026 — 255 subscribers8 August 2026 — 255 subscribers23 August 2026 — 258 subscribers7 August 202623 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 15 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 255–258 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
23 Aug 2026, 00:35258+3
8 Aug 2026, 09:18255no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:30255first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 10 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 35s
Average length
48s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

68 reactions across 10 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2638.2%
🔥2232.4%
👍1116.2%
❤‍🔥45.88%
22.94%
💔22.94%
😍11.47%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 68reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 10 April 2026 to 5 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Jun 2026, 07:15 UTC191 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Дорогие, я сейчас в стадии небольших изменений, переосмыслений. Скоро подключаем новые площадки и обновляем контент! Сейчас мне нужна ваша помощь 🙏 Ищу 2 человека из моей аудитории для глубинного исследования. Тема: как тело влияет на статус, доверие, деньги, клиентов и первое впечатление. Мне важно поговорить с предпринимателями, экспертами, коучами, владельцами онлайн-школ, блогерами, медийными людьми, риелтор

❤‍🔥42💔2👍1🔥1

6 May 2026, 16:38 UTC229 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

5🔥1

26 Apr 2026, 16:34 UTC262 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Одно лицо — два разных ощущения. У каждого лица есть более «мягкая» сторона лица и более «жесткая». И они считываются по-разному. ⏺одна сторона лица чаще воспринимается как более открытая и эмоциональная, ⏺другая — как более сдержанная и контролирующая. Это не обязательно «правая» или «левая». У каждого по-своему. Попробуй: Покажи по очереди стороны лица разным людям. Спроси: — где я вызываю больше доверия? Раз

42👍1

25 Apr 2026, 11:26 UTC167 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Сохраняй, чтобы не перепутать и влиять на результат.

3👍1🔥1

22 Apr 2026, 17:01 UTC164 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Эта неделя про тонкости коммуникации, которые повышают влияние. ⏺ Хочешь создать напряжение — садись напротив. ⏺Не боишься уйти в личное и более интимное — рядом. А как сесть, чтобы создать доверительное общение? Рассказать? Жми 🔥🔥

🔥83

22 Apr 2026, 16:23 UTC134 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Ты выбираешь место за столом или просто садишься?

  1. — Да, выбираю83%
  2. — Не думаю об этом17%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

22 Apr 2026, 13:55 UTC143 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Марк Бартон — известный психолог. Он делает вещи, которые другим разрушат репутацию. Но его это усиливает. Выверенный и точный невербальный образ, стратегия поведения, которые усиливают личный бренд. То, что ты сейчас видишь — это работа с восприятием. В переговорах это проявляется в деталях. Хочешь личный бренд, который выделяет и продает — приходи на разбор. Покажу, где ты теряешь влияние и как тебя реально счи

🔥6👍2

15 Apr 2026, 19:48 UTC128 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

В сторис я разобрала несколько спикеров с международного форума. Каждый с опытом, результатами и своим уровнем. Но считываются по-разному. Разберу чуть глубже, чтобы вы начали это замечать у себя. ___ 1. «Обычный хороший спикер» Хорошая дикция, аккуратный внешний вид, продуманный текст, уверенная база, уверенно стоит. Но: — тело почти не двигается — есть скованность — мало динамики — ощущается как лекция — взг

👍31🔥1

15 Apr 2026, 19:48 UTC111 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Кто из спикеров больше «зацепил» и вызвал доверие у вас?

  1. 10%
  2. 267%
  3. 333%
  4. 40%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

15 Apr 2026, 19:45 UTC111 viewsread 8 August 2026
Video

Спикеры международного форума 🔥 Заходите читать описание в сторис (обещаю, будет интересно), ставьте реакции и обязательно включайте звук. https://t.me/MariaAstapenko/s/94 #разбор #выступление

10 Apr 2026, 22:10 UTC151 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

4🔥2😍1

10 Apr 2026, 22:10 UTC150 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

2👍2

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @MariaAstapenko. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

22 Apr 2026, 16:23 UTCAnonymous Poll12 voters

Ты выбираешь место за столом или просто садишься?

  1. — Да, выбираю83%
  2. — Не думаю об этом17%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

15 Apr 2026, 19:48 UTCAnonymous Poll3 voters

Кто из спикеров больше «зацепил» и вызвал доверие у вас?

  1. 10%
  2. 267%
  3. 333%
  4. 40%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 10 April 2026 to 5 June 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Мари Астапенко | Статус в теле” (@MariaAstapenko), 258 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MariaAstapenko.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.