Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

MANOVA

@ManovaMagazin

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

25,181subscribers

-44 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001231443280
TypeChannel
Username@ManovaMagazin
DescriptionMagazin für neue Perspektiven und lebendige Debatten
Created2 March 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ManovaMagazin

Growth

25,18125,22725,2046 August 2026 — 25,225 subscribers6 August 2026 — 25,223 subscribers7 August 2026 — 25,227 subscribers8 August 2026 — 25,218 subscribers10 August 2026 — 25,214 subscribers11 August 2026 — 25,208 subscribers11 August 2026 — 25,198 subscribers14 August 2026 — 25,181 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 8 days, net -44. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 25,174–25,234 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 13:2725,181-17
11 Aug 2026, 23:2325,198-10
11 Aug 2026, 02:4125,208-6
10 Aug 2026, 00:2925,214-4
8 Aug 2026, 21:0625,218-9
7 Aug 2026, 18:5225,227+4
6 Aug 2026, 17:1025,223-2
6 Aug 2026, 04:3525,225first reading

Engagement

50 posts held, back to 25 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
15.1%
avg views ÷ 25,181 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,810
50 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.351%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
50
of 50 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 49 of 50 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held50 (25 July 202614 August 2026)
Views total190,425
Reactions total665
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Aug 2026, 16:07 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
100
Videos
42
Links
11,900

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

587 reactions across 43 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍25142.8%
13122.3%
💯12020.4%
🤔518.69%
👎345.79%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 49 of the 50 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 665reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 50 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

14 Aug 2026, 12:45 UTC885 viewsread 14 August 2026

Mut kommt vor der Handlung und ohne Handlung bleiben Hürden Hürden. ➥ Lesen, Anhören, Ausdrucken! Magazin für neue Perspektiven und lebendige Debatten

14 Aug 2026, 11:15 UTC≈1,140 views7 reactionsread 14 August 2026

Die „Alterssicherungskommission“ will Hinterbliebene finanziell schlechter stellen, um sie zu Erwerbsarbeit zu zwingen. ➥ Lesen, Anhören, Ausdrucken! Magazin für neue Perspektiven und lebendige Debatten

👎7

14 Aug 2026, 11:15 UTC≈1,110 views4 reactionsread 14 August 2026

Ein ukrainischer Offizier warnt vor einem möglichen zukünftigen Konflikt zwischen seinem Land und Polen. ➥ Lesen, Anhören, Ausdrucken! Magazin für neue Perspektiven und lebendige Debatten

2👎1🤔1

14 Aug 2026, 10:40 UTC≈1,210 views8 reactionsread 14 August 2026

Die Kultur staatlich geförderten Petzens hat ihren Höhepunkt überschritten. Auch die „Meldestelle REspect! im Netz“ wird abgewickelt. ➥ Lesen, Anhören, Ausdrucken! Magazin für neue Perspektiven und lebendige Debatten

8

13 Aug 2026, 12:05 UTC≈2,250 views13 reactionsread 14 August 2026

Die Erinnerung an ein uraltes Wissen kann ein Schlüssel in die Freiheit sein. ➥ Lesen, Anhören, Ausdrucken! Magazin für neue Perspektiven und lebendige Debatten

13

13 Aug 2026, 11:30 UTC≈2,270 views14 reactionsread 14 August 2026

Die EU bereitet einen großen Krieg gegen Russland vor — und die Menschen machen gar nichts. ➥ Lesen, Anhören, Ausdrucken! Magazin für neue Perspektiven und lebendige Debatten

💯11👎21

13 Aug 2026, 11:30 UTC≈2,180 views10 reactionsread 14 August 2026

Die Münchner Wasserpolitik schürt in der Bevölkerung die Angst vor Knappheit — auf anderen Gebieten spricht grüne Politik dem Umweltschutz Hohn. ➥ Lesen, Anhören, Ausdrucken! Magazin für neue Perspektiven und lebendige Debatten

👍5💯5

12 Aug 2026, 11:37 UTC≈2,610 views14 reactionsread 14 August 2026

Der Slawische Basar präsentiert ein Belarus, das wenig mit den westlichen Narrativen gemein hat. Hier wird ausgelassene Festivalstimmung mit der Erinnerung an Krieg, Verlust und dem Wunsch nach Kooperation verbunden. ➥ Lesen, Anhören, Ausdrucken! Magazin für neue Perspektiven und lebendige Debatten

14

12 Aug 2026, 10:06 UTC≈2,610 views24 reactionsread 14 August 2026

Zum jetzigen Zeitpunkt kann ein Zusammenhang zwischen Waldbränden und dem Klimawandel nicht bewiesen werden. Ein Blick auf andere ökologische Parameter und Fehlentscheidungen lohnt sich. ➥ Lesen, Anhören, Ausdrucken! Magazin für neue Perspektiven und lebendige Debatten

👍17💯42👎1

12 Aug 2026, 09:56 UTC≈2,880 views14 reactionsread 14 August 2026

Deutschlands Kampf gegen die Folgen klimatischer Veränderungen zeugt nicht von Gestaltungswillen, sondern hat sich längst ins Metaphysische verabschiedet. ➥ Lesen, Anhören, Ausdrucken! Magazin für neue Perspektiven und lebendige Debatten

👍11💯21

11 Aug 2026, 11:31 UTC≈3,130 views18 reactionsread 14 August 2026

Der Kult um Stefan Bandera beschädigt Europas Glaubwürdigkeit. ➥ Lesen, Anhören, Ausdrucken! Magazin für neue Perspektiven und lebendige Debatten

👍12💯3🤔21

11 Aug 2026, 10:58 UTC≈2,800 views7 reactionsread 14 August 2026

Die Großmutter unseres Autors gälte heute womöglich als rechts, ja vielleicht sogar als Nazi-Sympathisantin. Er vermisst ihre Ambivalenz dennoch. ➥ Lesen, Anhören, Ausdrucken! Magazin für neue Perspektiven und lebendige Debatten

7

Showing the 12 most recent of 50 posts we hold for @ManovaMagazin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 19,473 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“MANOVA” (@ManovaMagazin), 25,181 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ManovaMagazin.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.