Channel
@Manonyan
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
646subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001944871076 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Manonyan |
| Description | 【🧪💗】Миньон-сан, манонтива! Я Манонян, витубер безумный учёный! ❀ Инфопост: t.me/Manonyan/839 ✧ Поддержать: dalink.to/manonyan_ ✧ Сделать подарок: fetta.app/u/Manonyan ✧ Boosty: boosty.to/manonyan_ ♡ Аватарка: @kiryaanyam ♡ Фон: [не хватает бустов] |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Manonyan |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:31 | 646 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 07:08 | 646 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (31 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 3,733 |
| Reactions total | 485 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 17:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
485 reactions across 16 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5244767779860534939 | 216 | 44.5% | |
| custom 5246994028913777435 | 82 | 16.9% | |
| custom 5386458235559506433 | 71 | 14.6% | |
| ❤ | 43 | 8.87% | |
| custom 5388689307861021539 | 29 | 5.98% | |
| custom 5246844834634816273 | 27 | 5.57% | |
| 🔥 | 6 | 1.24% | |
| 👀 | 4 | 0.825% | |
| 😍 | 4 | 0.825% | |
| custom 5244830658181747834 | 3 | 0.619% |
Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 485reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🍓🍓🍓🍓🍓🍓🍓🍼🍓🍓🍓 спасибо всем за участие в ивенте, вот такая банда малышей у меня получилась, было весело рисовать 🤤
custom 524476777986053493923custom 52469940289137774354
Это буквально наш коллаб с Аллой и Рурой в гольф
custom 538645823555950643314custom 53886893078610215393
ЭТО ЧТО ЗА ПОДГОН ТАКОЙ С УТРА ПОРАНЬШЕ 😳😳😳 Кудесник, Брингер спасибо вам большое!!!! Я не знаю что за машин пати, но по описанию звучит как какой-то забавный кооп, А РЕБУТ КАЛИТКА, ТАК ЕЩЁ И ДЕЛЮКС ЭДШН Я ПАДАЮ, ОНИ Ж ЗА РЕБУТ ЦЕННИК НАКРУТИЛИ И ОН СТОИТ В 4 РАЗА БОЛЬШЕ, ЧЕМ ОРИГИНАЛЬНАЯ КАЛИТКА😳😳😳😳 Я в шоке, спасибо вам двоим больше, мне очень приятно!!! 😳😳😳 + Мне ещё Брингер высылал ключик на 2 дэс стрендинг, но я…
custom 524476777986053493917❤4custom 52469940289137774353
Как у вас дела, у меня очень плохо, мне очень грустно 😢 Ютуб гад, уже 4 день у меня шортсы набирают МАКСИМАЛЬНО МИНИМАЛЬНЫЕ ПРОСМОТРЫ, ДАЖЕ МЕНЬШЕ СОТКИ 😢😢😢😢😢😢 такой ужасной статистики никогда не было и я не понимаю почему, а перезалив шортсов не помогает :( я не понимаю почему алгоритмы Ютуба так издеваются над моим каналом 😢😢😢
custom 524699402891377743528custom 52468448346348162735custom 52448306581817478343
Купить что-нибудь или что-то такое 🙂
custom 524476777986053493924custom 53886893078610215399🔥5custom 53864582355595064331
КОХШКА СДЕЛАЛА ПИКСЕЛЬ МАНОНЮ ГЛЯНЬТЕ УВАААА Я ТАК ЛЮБЛЮ ЭТО 😭🥺🥺😭😭🥹🥹😭🥹🥺🥺🥺🥺🥺🥹🥹🥹🥹🥺😭🥺😭🥺🥹😭🥺😭🥺🥹🥺🥺😭🥺🥺😭🥹🥺🥹😭🥺😭🥺😭🥺😭🥺🥺😭🥺🥺🥺🥺😭
custom 524476777986053493928❤7custom 52469940289137774355
Так хорошо в отпуске, но всё-таки все равно соскучилась по стримам и по коллабам с ребятами 🥺🥹 вот бы можно было совместить и отпуск, и стриминг...! 👉
custom 524476777986053493925custom 52469940289137774355❤4
А ЕЩЁ СМОТРИТЕ 😭🥺🥺😭🥺 Со мной заказали штучку у Акане Иваввы, чтобы она нарисовала меня детсадовцем и ИВАВВА НАРИСОВАЛА МЕНЯ РЯДОМ С КЕРУУУУУ, Я РЕВУ 😭🥺😭🥹😭🥹😭🥹😭🥹🥹😭🥹 мне очень приятно и вообще такая милота уваааа! Меня всегда так радовало, когда фанаты заказывали у художников коммишки со своими любимыми вичубами, а тут со мной такое сделали, я плачууу 🥺😭🥺🥺😭😭🥹🥹😭🥹😭🥺😭🥺🥺😭🥺😭🥺😭 очень радостно, тем более я хотела артик от Ива…
custom 524476777986053493930❤4custom 52469940289137774354
САМОЕ СМЕШНОЕ, ЧТО Я СНОВА ПРОГЛОТИЛА СТЕНКУ 🙂 Мне кажется у меня уже новый зуб должен вырасти, блин!!!!
custom 524699402891377743520custom 53864582355595064336custom 53886893078610215395❤1
Вы не представляете как вкусно я ела бургер в Макдональдсе, он был такой вкусный это жесть А потом я обнаружила, что у меня зуб откололся =) этот же зуб у меня откололся пару месяцев назад, просто другая стенка 😢😢😢😢😢
custom 524684483463481627318custom 52447677798605349397custom 52469940289137774354❤1
Кстати!!! У моей любимой Минт Фантом недавно прошёл показ её нового наряда, вы посмотрите какая она милая 🥺🥺🥺🥺🥺 я её люблюююююю, она очень милая 😭😭 (ПРОСТИТЕ ЗА КАЧЕСТВО СКРИНОВ, Я ИХ С ТЕЛЕФОНА ДЕЛАЛА 🥺)
custom 524476777986053493924❤8😍4🔥1custom 52469940289137774351
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 538645823555950643321👀4custom 52468448346348162734
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @Manonyan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 246,141 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Manonyan Vtuber!” (@Manonyan), 646 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Manonyan.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.