Channel
@ManaUyat
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
719subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001291394778 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ManaUyat |
| Created | 25 March 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ManaUyat |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 01:04 | 719 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:32 | 720 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:28 | 720 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 6 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (6 July 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 4,215 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 20:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Майли, розимиз. Лекин шу ўринда менинг ҳам таклифим бор: етарли иш ўрни яратилмаган, аҳолисининг кўпи чет элга ишлаш учун кетган, саноатлашмаган, йўллари, касалхона-ю, мактаблари абгор, жамоат транспорти шаклланмаган, халқи ҳокимидан норози ҳудуд ҳокимлигининг эшигига "Шармандали ҳокимлик", ҳокимининг уйи ва хизмат мошинасига "Шармандали ҳоким" деган стикерми, плакатми (ёки шиор :))) ёпиштирайлик. Ишни интернетга чиқ…
Ўзбекистон гўзал гўшадир, Раҳбарлари ўша-ўшадир. Бекорчиликдан бир-биридан Қовун туширишда ошадир. @ManaUyat
Изоҳга тилим ожиз. @ManaUyat
Қашқадарёлик валломатларнинг бунақа қовун туширишидан қашқадарёликман, деб айтишгаям уялиб қолди одам. Ўзи зўрға қутулудик "70-75 легенда" дан. Булари ошиб тушди. Илтимос, нима қилсанглар ҳам, интернетга чиқазманглар. Шарманда қиляпсизлар одамни. Сизларда йўқ бўлса ҳам, менда обрў бор, "Ғолиб, қара, яна сенинг земларинг" деган гапларга тўлиб кетдику гуруҳлар. @ManaUyat
Ўзи қаердан чиқди ҳокимлар-у, аллаким валломатлар уйларнинг тозалигини текшириши? Интернет тўлиб кетдику бунақа видеоларга. Лекин опа боплабди, тозаламайман, мени уйимни тозалигини кўргунча, столбаларга қара, йўлга қара, газга қара деб (бу сенгаям, сенинг текширувинггаям дн*, дегани эрур). Видеодаги валломатнинг (кимлиги хз) айтиши бўйича столба, йўл ва газнинг эгаси бор эмиш, ўшалар қараркан. Шунда манови валломат…
Масалан, менинг хонам. Шунақа тартибсиз. Менгаям жарима солиб, интернетга чиқазишармикан?))) @ManaUyat
Шаҳрисабз ҳокими эмиш. Конституциявий эркинлик, шаън, қадр-қиммат даҳлсизлигига тупуриб қўйилган жойи. Тозаликка риоя қилиш керак лекин бу дегани одамларнинг видеосини, яшаш тарзини ҳаммага тарқатиш керак дегани эмас. @ManaUyat
Автобус авваллар Касби-Қарши йўналишида ҳам бор эди. 2014-18 йиллар академик лицейда ўқиб юрган пайтларим доим автобусда юрардим. Ҳар куни эрталаб битта автобус касбилик талабалар-у, бозорга савдо қилиш учун кетадиган бозорчиларни олиб кетарди. Кечикмасдик, жуда зўр кетардик. 7-8 та автобус бор эди, адашмасам. @ManaUyat
Жамоат транспортини ривожлантириш аҳолига жуда катта қулайлик олиб келади. Нафақат туманлараро, балки туман ичидаги қишлоқларни ҳам марказ билан боғлайдиган тизим қилинса, ўша туман раҳбариятининг ишлаётганини кўрсатади. Тўғри, жамоат транспорти фойдага кирмаслиги мумкин лекин яхшигина "очко" олиб келиши тайин. Масалан, Касби-Қарши йўналишида автобус йўқлиги учун Қаршига Бешкент орқали кетяпман. Олдинроқ бу йўнали…
Нега энди Бешкент-Қарши йўналишида автобус бор-у, Касби-Қарши йўналишида йўқ? Касбининг мутасаддилари ҳаракат қилиши керакми ёки Қаршининг? Туман мутасаддилари ҳаракат қилиши керак бўлса, демак, бешкентликлар аҳоли учун жон куйдирибди-да. @ManaUyat
Август ҳам келди... @ManaUyat
MyGovдан ҳарбий гувоҳномамни кўрсам, уйланган эканман. "Военкомат" ёки МайГов, хотинимни топиб беринглар😁. @ManaUyat
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ManaUyat. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“МанаУят | ҒС(А)” (@ManaUyat), 719 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ManaUyat.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.