Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Majmoo 'al-Fataawa of Shaykh Ibn Baaz & the Permanent Committee

Channel

Majmoo 'al-Fataawa of Shaykh Ibn Baaz & the Permanent Committee

@MajmooF

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

13,952subscribers

-206 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001246745203
TypeChannel
Username@MajmooF
DescriptionI will be posting the Fatwas of Shaykh ibn Baaz & the Permanent Committee, from the rulings that are translated and posted at www.alifta.net This channel is maintained by Aboo Bilal Nahim ibn Abd al Majid
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 November 2026
Measurements held60
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/MajmooF

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

13,94814,15914,053.56 August 2026 — 14,158 subscribers6 August 2026 — 14,158 subscribers6 August 2026 — 14,157 subscribers7 August 2026 — 14,159 subscribers8 August 2026 — 14,157 subscribers10 August 2026 — 14,155 subscribers12 August 2026 — 14,152 subscribers15 August 2026 — 14,146 subscribers16 August 2026 — 14,144 subscribers17 August 2026 — 14,137 subscribers18 August 2026 — 14,133 subscribers20 August 2026 — 14,129 subscribers22 August 2026 — 14,125 subscribers24 August 2026 — 14,119 subscribers25 August 2026 — 14,108 subscribers26 August 2026 — 14,106 subscribers29 August 2026 — 14,102 subscribers30 August 2026 — 14,098 subscribers31 August 2026 — 14,097 subscribers1 September 2026 — 14,095 subscribers2 September 2026 — 14,092 subscribers3 September 2026 — 14,089 subscribers5 September 2026 — 14,079 subscribers9 September 2026 — 14,072 subscribers11 September 2026 — 14,061 subscribers13 September 2026 — 14,055 subscribers14 September 2026 — 14,050 subscribers16 September 2026 — 14,044 subscribers19 September 2026 — 14,037 subscribers25 September 2026 — 14,031 subscribers4 October 2026 — 14,021 subscribers8 October 2026 — 13,999 subscribers13 October 2026 — 13,998 subscribers14 October 2026 — 13,995 subscribers15 October 2026 — 13,993 subscribers16 October 2026 — 13,987 subscribers17 October 2026 — 13,990 subscribers18 October 2026 — 13,986 subscribers19 October 2026 — 13,982 subscribers20 October 2026 — 13,973 subscribers21 October 2026 — 13,972 subscribers22 October 2026 — 13,967 subscribers23 October 2026 — 13,963 subscribers24 October 2026 — 13,962 subscribers25 October 2026 — 13,968 subscribers26 October 2026 — 13,965 subscribers27 October 2026 — 13,968 subscribers28 October 2026 — 13,964 subscribers29 October 2026 — 13,959 subscribers30 October 2026 — 13,956 subscribers31 October 2026 — 13,953 subscribers1 November 2026 — 13,951 subscribers3 November 2026 — 13,952 subscribers4 November 2026 — 13,953 subscribers5 November 2026 — 13,952 subscribers6 November 2026 — 13,953 subscribers7 November 2026 — 13,951 subscribers8 November 2026 — 13,948 subscribers9 November 2026 — 13,949 subscribers11 November 2026 — 13,952 subscribers13,9526 August 202611 November 2026
60 measurements spanning 98 days, net -206. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,916–14,191 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 60
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Nov 2026, 23:1113,952+3
9 Nov 2026, 22:3813,949+1
8 Nov 2026, 14:4713,948-3
7 Nov 2026, 08:3013,951-2
6 Nov 2026, 09:2413,953+1
5 Nov 2026, 11:0613,952-1
4 Nov 2026, 10:3113,953+1
3 Nov 2026, 13:0413,952+1
1 Nov 2026, 15:1913,951-2
31 Oct 2026, 16:3913,953-3
30 Oct 2026, 13:5013,956-3
29 Oct 2026, 14:1613,959-5
28 Oct 2026, 16:2113,964-4
27 Oct 2026, 17:5813,968+3
26 Oct 2026, 15:5013,965-3
25 Oct 2026, 18:5113,968+6
24 Oct 2026, 18:2713,962-1
23 Oct 2026, 20:5113,963-4
22 Oct 2026, 18:0713,967-5
21 Oct 2026, 13:3913,972first reading

Engagement

83 posts held, back to 30 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 73 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.91%
avg views ÷ 13,952 subscribers
Avg views / post
685
46 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.33%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
46
of 83 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 November 2026
Posts held83 (30 June 2026 – 13 November 2026)
Views total31,519
Reactions total419
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Nov 2026, 20:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈2,160
Videos
≈179
Links
≈2,530

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
45s
Average length
45s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

879 reactions across 83 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤53060.3%
👍28732.7%
💯404.55%
⚡202.28%
🔥20.228%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 83 of the 83 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 879 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 83 most recent posts we hold, published 30 June 2026 to 13 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 46 posts held from the last 30 days (4.35%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

13 Nov 2026, 07:20 UTC344 views7 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

Shaykh ‘Abdul-‘Aziz ibn Baaz (رحمه الله تعالى رحمة واسعة) said:: ❝...The reason behind wearing amulets being considered an act of Shirk...❞ - https://t.me/MajmooF/8361

❤3💯3👍1

13 Nov 2026, 07:20 UTC339 views6 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

Entering a graveyard does not invalidate Wudu’ - Shaykh Ibn Baaz - https://t.me/MajmooF/8350

👍3❤2⚡1

13 Nov 2026, 07:17 UTC292 views6 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

Q: What is your opinion - may Allah protect you - about determining a portion of the Qur’an to be recited in each Rak‘ah (unit of Prayer) and on each night as some Imams (the ones who lead congregational Prayer) do? - Shaykh Ibn Baaz - https://t.me/MajmooF/5396

👍3❤2⚡1

13 Nov 2026, 07:17 UTC324 views8 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

Shaykh ‘Abdul-‘Aziz Ibn Baaz (رحمه الله تعالى ورحمة واسعة) said: "… It is not permissible for them (men) to drag their clothes..." - https://t.me/MajmooF/5370

👍5❤2⚡1

13 Nov 2026, 07:17 UTC304 views13 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

Shaykh 'Abdul-'Aziz ibn Baaz (رحمه الله تعالى) said ❝...The foundation of the Din of Islam is to surrender to Allah (سبحانه وتعالى) ...❞ - https://t.me/MajmooF/8187

❤9👍4

11 Nov 2026, 15:57 UTC581 views13 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

The thirteenth question of Fatwa no. 5276 Q 13: Someone robbed some people. As an act of atonement and after being unable to locate them, he gave away a larger sum of money as Sadaqah (charity). He dedicated the reward of Sadaqah to the people whom he had robbed. - The Permanent Committee for Scholarly Research and Ifta' - https://t.me/MajmooF/3490

❤10👍3

11 Nov 2026, 15:57 UTC568 views10 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

"...Hastening to repay one's debts should be given priority over giving Sadaqah..."- The Permanent Committee for Scholarly Research and Ifta - https://t.me/MajmooF/6104\

❤5👍5

11 Nov 2026, 15:56 UTC519 views10 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

The second question of Fatwa no. 7301 Q 2: Is it permissible for Muslims to eat with silver-coated tableware? Some new Muslim converts fancy keeping these tableware items either because they do not rust with time or because they can not get rid of them. - The Permanent Committee for Scholarly Research and Ifta' - https://t.me/MajmooF/6470

❤5👍5

11 Nov 2026, 15:56 UTC514 views9 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

The second question of Fatwa no. 6704 Q 2: Is it permissible for a smoker to carry cigarettes when he goes to the Masjid (mosque) for Salah (Prayer)? What is the ruling on this? - The Permanent Committee for Scholarly Research and Ifta' - https://t.me/MajmooF/6464

❤5👍4

10 Nov 2026, 16:43 UTC659 views10 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

Ruling on Describing Nurses as Angels of Mercy - Shaykh Ibn Baaz - https://t.me/MajmooF/149

❤5👍5

10 Nov 2026, 16:42 UTC635 views8 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

The first question of Fatwa no. 7082 Q 1: I am a religiously committed woman. My husband who smokes the water pipe asks me sometimes to repair it for him. Am I sinful if I do so? - The Permanent Committee for Scholarly Research and Ifta' - https://t.me/MajmooF/6444

👍5❤3

10 Nov 2026, 16:41 UTC556 views10 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

Shaykh 'Abdul-'Aziz ibn Baaz (رحمه الله تعالى رحمة واسعة) said: "...It is required from the wife to beautify herself for her husband,..." - https://t.me/MajmooF/5796

❤4👍4⚡2

Showing the 12 most recent of 83 posts we hold for @MajmooF. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@MajmooF edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
31 August 2026
Most recent edit
31 August 2026

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Beneficial Knowledge
@BeneficialKnowledge · 26,542
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 12 September 2026
Keys To Knowledge
@k2knyc · 21,184
Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 24 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Majmoo 'al-Fataawa of Shaykh Ibn Baaz & the Permanent Committee” (@MajmooF), 13,952 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MajmooF.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.