Channel
@MagicMachines
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
31subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001319643795 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @MagicMachines |
| Description | Magic Machines & Cyber Magic | Anthroposophy | Rudolf Steiner | Philosophy of Freedom https://magicmachines.life |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/MagicMachines |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 02:46 | 31 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:33 | 31 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 30 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (30 March 2026 – 30 July 2026) |
| Views total | 28 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 02:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
🤖📰 Google News Initiative AI Skills Program 2.0 | Free AI Training for Journalists & Media Professionals in India! Opportunities for Youth Ready to transform your newsroom with Artificial Intelligence? The Google News Initiative (GNI) AI Skills Program 2.0, delivered with technical training partner How India Lives, is offering experienced journalists and media professionals in India a six-week practical AI training p…
Crypto's Bloodiest Half-Year: 212 Exploits Stole $1.1B as AI-Powered Attacks Go Mainstream 🌺🌺🌺🌺🌺🌺🌺🌺 Blockaid's H1 2026 report reveals 212 onchain exploits draining $1.1B from Web3 protocols. North Korea's Lazarus Group drove over $600M in losses, and AI prompt injection attacks are emerging as the next major threat vector. Here's what every builder needs to know. 🌺🌺🌺🌺🌺🌺🌺🌺 The first half of 2026 has been the most acti…
TESLA НАШЛА СПОСОБ ПОСТРОИТЬ САМЫЙ БОЛЬШОЙ СУПЕРКОМПЬЮТЕР ДЛЯ ИИ В МИРЕ, НЕ СТРОЯ НИ ОДНОГО ДАТА-ЦЕНТРА. Ответ лежал в миллионах припаркованных электромобилях Tesla. Вся индустрия ИИ упёрлась в стену. И дело не в чипах. Дело в электроэнергии. Строительство новых дата-центров для ИИ теперь означает многолетнее ожидание подключения к сети.. Так например, проект Stargate от OpenAI и Oracle тратит до $500 миллиардов …
Reflection by Pope Leo XIV “We are called to do our part, remembering that ‘the civilization of love will not arise from a single or spectacular gesture, but from the sum total of small and steadfast acts of fidelity that serve as a bulwark against dehumanization’ (Magnifica Humanitas 213). Another aspect of fostering and working toward an authentic civilization of love is dialogue. A dialogue grounded in truth that …
ИИ. СПАСАТЬ, А НЕ ГОСПОДСТВОВАТЬ: УРОК ТОЛКИНА В ПЕРВОЙ ЭНЦИКЛИКЕ ПАПЫ ЛЬВА XIV В эпоху, подвластную алгоритмам и технологическому новаторству , человечество стоит перед решительным выбором: направлять прогресс или быть им попранным. Именно из этого осознания рождается Magnifica Humanitas, первая энциклика Папы Льва XIV, текст, который предлагает взглянуть на отношения между человеческой личностью и искусственным ин…
Photo, posted without a caption
а способность быстро менять конфигурацию работы. Очень важный вывод Скорее всего, ближайшие годы будут не “концом работы”. А: • концом предсказуемой профессиональной стабильности. Это разные вещи. Самый реалистичный сценарий Не: • “все без работы”. А: • высокая турбулентность; • резкое падение ценности части навыков; • сверхдоходы у небольшой группы; • постоянная необходимость адаптации; • рост нестабил…
Поэтому важно: • собирать собственную аудиторию; • контакты; • комьюнити; • прямые отношения. 9. Развивать человеческие навыки, которые плохо автоматизируются Наиболее устойчивыми становятся: • переговоры; • эмпатия; • лидерство; • организация людей; • публичность; • доверие; • способность снижать хаос; • принятие решений в неопределённости. ИИ помогает с информацией. Но ответственность люди пока хотят…
Для эмигрантов и фрилансеров риск сейчас не только в том, что «ИИ заменит профессию». Гораздо опаснее другое: • корпорации начинают забирать себе посреднические функции; • AI-интерфейсы упрощают задачи так, что клиенту больше не нужен “исполнитель на каждую мелочь”; • рынок становится глобальным, а конкуренция — почти мгновенной. Поэтому стратегия “просто лучше работать” уже недостаточна. Нужен переход: от прода…
логично распределять работу: • не 40 часов на часть людей и безработица для остальных, а: • 25–30 часов для большего количества людей. Исторически это уже происходило: рабочая неделя когда-то была значительно длиннее. 5. Новая модель дохода: базовый доход или AI-дивиденды Видео затрагивает эту тему — и это не фантастика. Если ИИ создаёт огромную автоматизированную прибыль, возможны модели: • налогов на сверхав…
Видео поднимает не столько тему «ИИ отнимет работу», сколько проблему архитектуры экономики будущего: производительность растёт быстрее, чем общество успевает перераспределять доход, обучение и роли людей. Это важное различие. При этом в исследованиях нет полного консенсуса: • часть данных уже показывает рост давления на занятость и сокращение entry-level позиций; • другая часть исследований говорит, что массовая …
Коротко: риск высокий. Но важно понимать — заменяются не “люди целиком”, а отдельные функции, слои ответственности и экономические роли. И здесь сейчас много крайностей: • одни недооценивают скорость; • другие переоценивают полноту замещения. Реалистичная картина — где-то посередине. Что действительно может произойти за 1–3 года Очень вероятно ИИ сильно снизит ценность: • большинства “средних” когнитивных усл…
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @MagicMachines. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 971,608 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
@MagicMachines named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Magic Machines” (@MagicMachines), 31 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MagicMachines.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.