Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Silent Ghost

Channel

Silent Ghost

@Madhouse2015_45

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

41subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002068059519
TypeChannel
Username@Madhouse2015_45
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Madhouse2015_45

Growth

414241.57 August 2026 — 42 subscribers10 August 2026 — 42 subscribers16 August 2026 — 41 subscribers7 August 202616 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 9 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 41–42 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 18:4341-1
10 Aug 2026, 17:3142no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:4742first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 30 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
66.5%
avg views ÷ 41 subscribers
Avg views / post
27.3
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
4
of 11 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held11 (30 May 20267 August 2026)
Views total109
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 17:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 05:40 UTC24 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Бык, ♉🐂 bull на тюркских языках

24 Jul 2026, 16:02 UTC41 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @volgaokadna

🤩VOLGA–OKA PROJECT ✨ 🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 Мы сделали долгожданный разбор этногенеза мерян и мещеры (культуры рязано-окских могильников) — получилось информативно, советуем к прочтению! https://telegra.ph/Razbor-dnk-Meshchyory-i-Meryan-i-ih-blizost-s-sovremennym-populyaciyam-06-10 🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 ✍️Для связи: @Drinevirya

13 Jul 2026, 15:56 UTC45 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Самая новая генетическая картина Чувашей Очередные предварительные итоги по гаплогруппам Y по данным, собранным проектом в базах FTDNA и Генотек на 5 февраля 2025 года: Всего образцов - 76 (из них 17 сделаны в Генотек, остальные в FTDNA). Выборка хорошая, репрезентативная, со всех районов. Из них основные гаплогруппы: R1a - 18 образцов (23,68%) R1b - 2 (2,63%) N - 18 (23,68%) E - 16 (21,05%) J - 15 (19,74%) I - 6

28 Jun 2026, 22:42 UTC70 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Аутосомная разбивка среднего тюрка-сельджука, мигрировавшего в Анатолию в период сельджукских завоеваний (XI–XII вв.) — G25 / Vahaduo Общий состав Западноевразийский компонент — 51,8% Восточноазиатский компонент — 48,2% Бронзовый век 1. Монголия (культура плиточных могил, ранний железный век) — 40,4% 2. Синташтинская культура (древние арии) — 29,6% 3. Бактрийско-Маргианский археологический комплекс (БМАК, доиндо

24 Jun 2026, 12:03 UTC56 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @volgaokadnaPhoto

🤩VOLGA–OKA DNA PROJECT ✨ 🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 Компонентный ДНК-анализ русских Рязани. ДНК-анализ выполнен при помощи QpAdm. Для жителей Рязани мы сделали одну модель на бронзовый век, и две на железный век: в первой мы использовали Минино, во второй — Пьянобор. Какая из них наиболее успешна — решать вам. Исходя из разбора, можно заметить такие компонентные соотношения: Бронзовый век: 🐻«Балтийский» (Estonia_LBA_StoneCistGra

13 Jun 2026, 12:07 UTC74 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

ДНК разбивка Поляков 🇵🇱 🧬 Аутосомная разбивка: Ранее Средневековье – Поздний Железный век – 62.6% Славяне – 15.3% Германцы – 15.1% Балты – 7% Кельты Поздний Бронзовый век– поздний каменный век неолит – 52.1% Культура шнуровой керамики – 32.9% Ранние европейские фермеры (культура шаровидных амфор) – 14.8% западные охотники собиратели – 0.2% восточная Азия Бронзовый век– Неолит поздний каменный век – 49.6% Просто Индо

7 Jun 2026, 06:25 UTC66 viewsread 10 August 2026

Турецкая янычарская песня, просвещённая падению Константинополя в 1453 году.

30 May 2026, 10:00 UTC71 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @ieeieieisksjPhoto

Потомки индоариев мирно расселялись по территории северной Индии, смешиваясь с представителями дравидийских народов. Индоарии принесли с собой традиции земледелия, колесницы, коневодство и индоевропейский язык, основав тем самым ведическую культуру веды ведать это общеиндоевропейское слово интересная параллель между балто-славянами и индо-иранцами, в некоторых славянских языках до сих пор это слово обозначает знать,

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @Madhouse2015_45. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Silent Ghost” (@Madhouse2015_45), 41 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Madhouse2015_45.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.