Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Monica___K

Channel

Monica___K

@M_Kingsley

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry

648subscribers

-18 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001833184224
TypeChannel
Username@M_Kingsley
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 October 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/M_Kingsley

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

6486666577 August 2026 — 666 subscribers8 August 2026 — 666 subscribers16 August 2026 — 662 subscribers23 August 2026 — 658 subscribers29 August 2026 — 657 subscribers14 September 2026 — 656 subscribers29 September 2026 — 654 subscribers9 October 2026 — 648 subscribers7 August 20269 October 2026
8 measurements spanning 63 days, net -18. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 645–669 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Oct 2026, 16:37648-6
29 Sept 2026, 00:59654-2
14 Sept 2026, 20:58656-1
29 Aug 2026, 15:38657-1
23 Aug 2026, 00:24658-4
16 Aug 2026, 08:37662-4
8 Aug 2026, 02:34666no change
7 Aug 2026, 21:56666first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 20 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

6 reactions across 3 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 83.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍583.3%
❤116.7%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 16:31 UTC50 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

(clients were again on the right side, took 4 attempts to really go and bring again daily profit.... short NQ) "Rushed In Long?" Too many investors probably aren‘t, and hard to blame them in Tuesday‘s steady buying. I didn‘t forecast the upswing to go on yesterday, and prices reversed lower, is it enough, arguably enough? Not that the much awaited SNDK earnings would add to risk appetite, so the only hefty move we sa…

👍1

5 Aug 2026, 14:41 UTC57 viewsread 8 August 2026

(after Mon and Tue free articles...) "That’s a Breakout" Not yielding an inch, indices sprang higher right after the opening bell yesterday. It was more clear in case of ES that there wouldn‘t be a breakdown below any premarket support level, but it was Nasdaq that delivered true strength, and it was beyond MAGS. With software pulling clearly higher, it was particularly that broadening in tech (where semis and DRAM p…

31 Jul 2026, 13:58 UTC93 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

(Did I say clients got the tech long exit at the top? Get all my real-time thoughts in time...) "Bottom In?" How likely was that following post-FOMC smashing, that the very notion of QQQ bottom being in, could be contemplated one day later? Clients caught the tech upswing reasonably early in the European session, and that was (not just) based on the Asian session performance. Interestingly, there was no dip yesterday…

👍1

30 Jul 2026, 17:21 UTC96 viewsread 8 August 2026

Very fine client gains in this bullish tech turnaround... NQ QQQ NDX

30 Jul 2026, 14:12 UTC94 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Clients were fully ready for today's NQ rally since mid-European session... were you too? "Extreme Volatility and Rally" Volatility on FOMC day, and the intial part of seeing (major) weakness rule across indices into FOMC, only to be followed by a relief rally. This one developed from reasonably oversold (not extremely oversold) readings of QQQ above my target of 660, tech bounced from above 663 already. No hike FOMC…

👍3❤1

29 Jul 2026, 18:45 UTC81 viewsread 8 August 2026

And undershoot of yesterday's lows, solid reversal well before FOMC, and no real fear striking ES NQ.... till MSFT, META earnings perhpas :) Do you see tech leading SPX in the bump higher too? Shared with clients as events unfolded, and more.

29 Jul 2026, 14:51 UTC77 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

(clients got their short NQ profits already) "Charting Volatility Ahead" The weekly Nasdaq plan talked Sunday is unfolding well, so what am I expecting for today‘s FOMC and crucial tech earnings? Will MSFT and META meet similar fate as GOOGL did, and what is that going to do to tech and S&P 500? Let‘s recap as I did foe clients already, and look ahead.

28 Jul 2026, 18:17 UTC71 viewsread 8 August 2026

Bearish tech bias premarket gains, necessity to sidestep the intraday bump, and then prices again rolling lower in NQ QQQ...

28 Jul 2026, 17:59 UTC67 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

"Tech Bottom?" Sunday bullish gap didn‘t last long, and retail wasn‘t sucked in off the opening bell – or is it that the lurry of selling was so overwhelming? Hundreds of NQ points knocked off just like that, no retracement – those larger TF implications talked on the weekend (and as regards the shorting vehicle of choice, tech), worked mercilessly. At the same time, straight down isn‘t a pattern… (full article has …

27 Jul 2026, 13:03 UTC69 viewsread 8 August 2026

"What’s Wrong With Tech" Friday unfolded quite similarly to the day before – premarket resilience in Nasdaq gave way for another bout of selling that came soon after the opening bell, undershooting my target and recovering from there (fine place to go short), and then continue down in a fresh challenge of intraday lows. The hyperscalers vs. semis and memory seesaw continued, and this time around, it were the rising …

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @M_Kingsley. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Monica___K” (@M_Kingsley), 648 subscribers as measured 9 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/M_Kingsley.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.