Channel
@MUSLOSSY
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
212subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001553279809 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @MUSLOSSY |
| Description | Канал музыкального издательства «ЦЕЗИС». Я, Дмитрий Филиппов, ген. директор, буду делиться с вами новостями издательства и контентом из сфер музыки и авторского права. Сайт: https://цезис.рф Для связи: @Vavan_El_Albino Для демо: [email protected] |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/MUSLOSSY |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:01 | 212 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:31 | 212 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 20 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 17 of 18 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (20 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 970 |
| Reactions total | 105 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 11:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
105 reactions across 17 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 29 | 27.6% | |
| 👍 | 18 | 17.1% | |
| custom 5325668363668579536 | 17 | 16.2% | |
| 🆒 | 14 | 13.3% | |
| 🔥 | 10 | 9.52% | |
| 😍 | 4 | 3.81% | |
| 🤔 | 4 | 3.81% | |
| custom 5202116637192379814 | 3 | 2.86% | |
| custom 5197649355808466909 | 2 | 1.90% | |
| 🎉 | 2 | 1.90% | |
| 🍾 | 1 | 0.952% | |
| 🤩 | 1 | 0.952% |
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 105reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#НовыйРелиз #КейсыУспеха У ODIUM CLXUD новый трек! И сразу 4 плейлиста 🔥 Поздравляем нашего музыканта с новым достижением 🥳 Новый трек to stars уже доступен на всех площадках. Для начала выходных - самое то! Ваш ЦЕЗИС
❤1🔥1custom 53256683636685795361
Yandex 💋
🍾1🎉1🆒1
#НовыйРелиз Продолжая разговор о Kraftwerk, мы решили поделиться с вами совсем свежим треком от Psybolord, который тоже выполнен в похожей стилистике (по мнению редакции 😁) (Why Don’t You) Dance With Me вы можете послушать на всех площадках, а потом поделитесь мнением, похож ли он на творчество Kraftwerk: 🔥 - похож! 🤔 - не очень Ваш ЦЕЗИС
🤔4🔥3🆒3custom 51976493558084669091
#ВооруженнымВзглядом Спасибо всем, кто поделился реакциями! Мы это очень ценим, и нам очень важна ваша поддержка! 🙌🙌🙌 А теперь самое интересное про Kraftwerk: чем же они нас так зацепили… Ответ предельно просто: Kraftwerk придумали будущее. Просто оно пришло чуть позже. Если сегодня электронная музыка кажется нам чем-то естественным: синтезаторы, драм-машины, механические ритмы, музыка про технологии и искусственн…
custom 53256683636685795364👍2❤1
Пока готовим для вас самое интересное про Kraftwerk, не можем не поделиться успехами другого электронщика Lurt’а 🔥 Теперь наш совместный трек у него на первом месте! Ура! Ваш ЦЕЗИС
👍3custom 53256683636685795362🆒1
#ВооруженнымВзглядом Народ ещё помнит легенд 😎 Для тех, кто пока вне контекста: заметили гигантских размеров очередь за мерчом группы Kraftwerk 🦾 Такого, если честно, мы не ожидали… Если наберём на этих фото больше 5 ❤️, то обязательно расскажем подробнее о самой группе и о том, почему же нас так поразила эта очередь. Это неслучайно 🤫 Ваш ЦЕЗИС
❤6custom 53256683636685795363🆒2
Наши друзья концерт устраивают! Приходите 🙌
❤4
🤠 Друзья, уже через неделю в культовом питерском клубе Fish Fabrique Bar (Лиговский 53) состоится выступление не менее культовой (да простят меня другие культовые личности и коллективы) группы BluesСобеседник. Когда мы играли в этом же заведении концерт в марте, почти все присутствующие на мероприятии назвали выступление лучшим за всю историю питерских (и не только) концертов группы. Не думал, что когда-нибудь произн…
👍3🔥2🆒1
#НовыйРелиз А ещё у Stive Raymounds недавно вышел новый трек, настоящая рок-баллада. Всех приглашаем к прослушиванию 👈 Ваш ЦЕЗИС
🆒3custom 53256683636685795362❤1
Вот такой у нас сегодня вечер 😁
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 52021166371923798143👍2😍1
#НовыйРелиз Решили на ночь поделиться с вами новым клипом от Stive Raymounds 🙌 Приятного просмотра и прекрасных сновидений! Ваш ЦЕЗИС
❤2🆒2😍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @MUSLOSSY. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“MUSLOSSY by ЦЕЗИС” (@MUSLOSSY), 212 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MUSLOSSY.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.