Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

16:29 по Москве

@MSK1629

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

493subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001424612939
TypeChannel
Username@MSK1629
DescriptionГомеопатические методы лечения лудомании или веселая половинка штанги Талеба ЛС: @shamtu
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/MSK1629

Growth

4937 Aug 2026, 11:08 — 493 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 04:20 — 493 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 11:088 Aug 2026, 04:20
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 492–494 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 04:20493no change
7 Aug 2026, 11:08493first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 10 October 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
365.1%
avg views ÷ 493 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,800
1 post measured
Reaction rate
1.94%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 July 2026
Posts held20 (10 October 202515 July 2026)
Views total1,800
Reactions total35
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 04:20 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
322
Videos
1
Links
146

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

573 reactions across 20 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍15527.1%
🔥10818.8%
😁7312.7%
🎉579.95%
🤣457.85%
💯386.63%
223.84%
👏193.32%
🤔132.27%
👌101.75%
💔50.873%
😢50.873%
🙈40.698%
🥴30.524%
❤‍🔥20.349%
💩20.349%
😭20.349%
🤝20.349%
🥰20.349%
🍌10.175%
5 further kinds50.873%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 573reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 October 2025 to 15 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Jul 2026, 08:22 UTC707 views46 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Также, на СД был утверждён новый брендбук

😁28🤣11🔥5👍2

10 Jul 2026, 08:22 UTC463 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @markettwits

❌🇷🇺#PLZL #дивиденд СД ПОЛЮС РЕКОМЕНДУЕТ ПРИОСТАНОВИТЬ ДИВИДЕНДНЫЕ ВЫПЛАТЫ ДО 2030 Г

🙈4🥰2😁1

8 Jul 2026, 10:05 UTC632 views52 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Пидарасы

🤣27💯14💔4❤‍🔥2😭2🍌1🍓1🤝1

4 Jul 2026, 13:29 UTC791 views36 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Друзья, привет! Подвести итоги за два квартала 2026 вовремя не получилось из-за отпуска, поэтому срез будет на конец дня 3 июля. Прошлый срез давал 31 марта. На закрытии 03.07.26 портфель выглядел так: 🏢 ЗПИФы недвижимости 21,3% 🏦 Сбербанк 13,6% 🌾 ФосАгро 12,3% ⛽️ Газпромнефть 11,2% ⛏ Полюс золото 10,5% 🩺 Мать и дитя 7,6% ⛽️ Роснефть 5,2% 🚛 АдвТрак 4,5% 🏠 Дом.РФ 4,2% 💼 опционы 3,0% ⛽️ Татнефть 2,9% 🇧🇷 P

👍19👌8🔥62😁1

20 May 2026, 13:29 UTC872 views66 reactionsread 8 August 2026

А каналу между тем исполнилось сегодня 5 лет.

🎉34🔥205👍3👏3💩1

1 Apr 2026, 11:07 UTC≈1,310 views32 reactionsread 8 August 2026

В сети гуляет информация, что перекрытие Ормуза и возникший дефицит удобрений не поможет ФосАгро. Логика следующая: из Залива сейчас не поставляются не только удобрения, но и сера. Сера нужна для производства серной кислоты, а последняя необходима для фосфоросодержащих удобрений. На самом деле, сера является побочным продуктом при переработке нефти и газа, а также некоторых металлургических операций при производстве

👍21🔥7💯3💩1

1 Apr 2026, 09:18 UTC≈1,020 views35 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Друзья, всем привет! Итоги портфеля решил подводить ежеквартально. Прошлый срез был 31 декабря. На закрытии 31.03.26 портфель выглядел так: 🏢 ЗПИФы недвижимости 23,8% 🌾 ФосАгро 14,8% ⛽️ Роснефть 13,8% ⛽️ Газпром нефть 11,1% 🏦 Сбербанк 10,3% ⛏ Полюс золото 9,9% 🩺 Мать и дитя 6,5% 💸 LQDT 2,6% 🇧🇷 Petrobras 2,4% 🍷 Белуга 2,0% 🥇 "Бумажное" золото 0,8% 🚬 BTI 0,7% 🐍 Viper energy 0,7% 💼 опционы 0,5% За перв

🔥18👏9👍8

25 Mar 2026, 16:15 UTC914 views28 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Сегодня Далласский "филиал" ФРС опубликовал обзор энергетики за 1 квартал 2026 года. Он, вообще, целиком заслуживает внимания, но меня заинтересовал комментарий от топ-менеджера нефтегазовой компании (эти комментарии анонимны, поэтому нет ни имени, ни названия конторы): Создается впечатление, что мы потеряли контроль над войной в Иране. Разница между ценой на нефть на бумажных носителях и ценой на физическую нефть, к

👍18🔥10

8 Mar 2026, 15:58 UTC795 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026

А вообще, довольно хороший отраслевой анализ по ситуации с Ираном (особенно с учетом того, что это было опубликовано еще 1 марта) сделал наш добрый друг Андрей Пеканов https://t.me/sneglev/259. Единственное с чем не могу согласиться это: 5. Россия до вторжения также стремилась развивать бизнес с ОАЭ и Саудовской Аравией, в т.ч. в транспортной сфере, эти проекты теперь будут камнем преткновения в балансе ухудшившихся

👍9🤔2👌1

6 Mar 2026, 05:20 UTC≈2,290 views26 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Можно предположить, что с целью снижения цен будет начата продажа фьючерсов. Но! Если к моменту их экспирации, цена на нефть не упадёт, то будет шорт-сквиз, что принесет просто адскую боль через потерю денег и повышение цен (а это плохо для рейтинга Трампа, который и так невысок). Значит шортить будут не ближний фьючерс, а подальше, фактически заявляя о своем прогнозном сроке завершения конфликта или открытии Ормуза.

👍155🔥4🤔2

16 Jan 2026, 08:42 UTC929 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Классно, когда у тебя неплохая экспозиция на добытчика урана😎 Жаль, только что его акции заблокированы😫

😁10🥴3👍2💯2💔1🤝1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @MSK1629. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“16:29 по Москве” (@MSK1629), 493 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MSK1629.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.