Channel
@MONEYMAGNET_TON
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
80subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002104706944 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @MONEYMAGNET_TON |
| Description | Инвестиции в самый разивающийся блокчейн нашего времени. Основатель: @MMAGNETOO Вступай в чатик: @MONEY_MAGNET_CHAT Гайды, обсуждения, советы. |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 13 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/MONEYMAGNET_TON |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 19:01 | 80 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:33 | 80 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 13 May 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 June 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
44 reactions across 13 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 20 | 45.5% | |
| 👍 | 15 | 34.1% | |
| 🔥 | 8 | 18.2% | |
| 🍾 | 1 | 2.27% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 44reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 13 May 2024 to 13 June 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
👋Давненько не было новостей и в целом активностей на канале, но потихоньку набираю обороты и возвращаюсь на рынок 🖼Ребята из чата просили высказать мое мнение и представление об нфт на нынешнем рынке ➡️В основном главной функцией нфт является выдача плюшек холдерам и какие то преимущества в проекте, в котором вы ее приобрели ➡️Ярким примером является коллекция нфт от проекта Fuel - Fuel Barrel, при покупке которо…
❤3👍1
Геноцид жидонов: POT закрылся Цитирую пост из их оф канала: Jackpot.ton закрывает свои двери. За все время существования проекта мы наблюдали крайне низкую вовлеченность игроков. Похоже, сама идея нашего проекта многих не заинтересовала. Вся жизнь проекта напрямую зависела от вовлеченности сообщества. Несмотря на большую рекламную кампанию на некоторых крупнейших каналах, посвященных TON, сообщество не проявило…
❤2
В ближайшее время буду использовать этот канал, как свою книгу для заметок про токены, инструменты, новые идеи, куда двигаться дальше. Если интересно - смотрите, делитесь, задавайте вопросы, если ноу, то байбай.
👍6
ЧТО ПРОИСХОДИТ У МЕНЯ И НА РЫНКЕ? Дела мои достаточно печальны... Если говорить достаточно сухо, то все мои последние заходы уносили меня в страшный минус. Что случилось? Да просто рынок опустел на "хорошие" проекты, где "кто первый - тот молодец". Сейчас на рынке выходят проекты +- от одной команды, где пресейл -кушает (уже чутка), покупатели - сосут, а снайперы "бриты" (дада, конечно!). Во что зайти можно? Ес…
👍5
Был большой перерыв. Отдохнул немного от крипты и от мыслей о своих проебах. Буду потихоньку возвращаться и набирать обороты. Сегодня вечером сделаю ресерч о предстоящих монетах и что я вообще о них думаю. Также сегодня выходит токен $BOOBA от хесуса, глянуть что как тут Всем гм и хорошего продуктивного дня. Дальше - больше.
❤5
❤️ Подвожу итоги розыгрыша на Nft The Stons! 👑Победитель - @sirJKiS, он оказался 23 участником, который отправил кошелек, поздравляю! 📌Спасибо всем, кто принял участие, дальше больше и интересней!
❤3🔥1
Осталось меньше часа до конца розыгрыша, ещё не поздно поучаствовать!
❤1
Sticker, posted without a caption
Как я тут оказался в 2 часа ночи ?
👍1
👍 Всем доброго времени суток! 🖼 Хочу рассказать о недавно стартовавшей коллекции NFT и сразу устроить розыгрыш на одну нфтишку среди подписчиков ⌛️ Коллекция The Stons от создателя нашумевших The Simpleton, всего за неделю от начала создания уже занимает 28 строчку по недельной статистике на гет гемс и имеет объем продаж более 1,2к Ton! ❓ Так откуда такой ажиотаж? Изначально коллекция создавалась просто для шила …
❤1🍾1
приглашайте друзей, вам очень понадобится
👍1
Розыгрыш -ам -ам?
❤2🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @MONEYMAGNET_TON. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 999,982 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@MONEYMAGNET_TON named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“MONEYMAGNET💸” (@MONEYMAGNET_TON), 80 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MONEYMAGNET_TON.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.