Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for NMU — Ummu MY & MA

Channel

NMU — Ummu MY & MA

@MNU_ummu_MY_MA

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

144subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003282120487
TypeChannel
Username@MNU_ummu_MY_MA
CreatedBetween 1 October 2025 and 28 February 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/MNU_ummu_MY_MA

Growth

1441461459 Aug 2026, 09:30 — 146 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 17:03 — 144 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 09:309 Aug 2026, 17:03
2 measurements taken within a single day, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 144–146 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 17:03144-2
9 Aug 2026, 09:30146first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 19 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
27.2%
avg views ÷ 144 subscribers
Avg views / post
39.2
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.78%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held20 (19 July 20265 August 2026)
Views total745
Reactions total5
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 09:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

5 reactions across 4 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍480.0%
👏120.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 17:37 UTC11 viewsread 9 August 2026
Poll

Kayfiyatlaringiz yaxshimi?

  1. Inshaallohnot shown
  2. Alhamdulillahnot shown

Results were not being shown when we read this poll, so no share was published for any option. That is not zero — it is an absence, and we record it as one.

21 Jul 2026, 19:02 UTC74 viewsread 9 August 2026
Poll

Kayfiyatingiz yaxshimi?

  1. Inshaalloh50%

Shares as published, totalling 50%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

20 Jul 2026, 19:16 UTC77 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026

❓ Tafriq nima ekanligini bilasizmi 📖 Tafriq (تفريق) — arabcha so‘z bo‘lib, ikki insonning orasini ajratish, mehr va ishonchni buzish, nifoq solish degan ma'noni anglatadi. 💔 Er-xotin o‘rtasida tafriq ba'zan: • 🗣️ yolg‘on bilan, • 🚫 bo‘hton bilan, • 👂 g‘iybat bilan, • 📩 tekshirilmagan xabar bilan, • 😈 ig‘vo va fitna bilan yuz beradi. Shaytonning eng sevimli maqsadlaridan biri ham — oilalarni parchalash. ⚠️ Ammo e

👍2

20 Jul 2026, 13:27 UTC74 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Bolam katta bo'lyapti, deb quvonib yurgan ekanman. Ko'zguga qaramabman, deydi, do'stlarimdan biri.) ✍️ Nuriyaxonim Ulugʼbek qizi 🌴 Ulaning & ulashing: https://t.me/MNU_ummu_MY_MA

20 Jul 2026, 13:26 UTC42 viewsread 9 August 2026

Optimist samaliyotni, pessimist parashutni ixtiro qilgan ekan. 😇

20 Jul 2026, 13:25 UTC45 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Tasbehni qarang 💐 Barcha muslim-muslima, mo'min-mo'mina, sobir-sobira, solih-solihalarga shunday ahil-inoqlikda qarish nasib qilsin. 😊🤲 🌴 Ulaning & ulashing: https://t.me/MNU_ummu_MY_MA

👏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @MNU_ummu_MY_MA. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

5 Aug 2026, 17:37 UTCAnonymous Poll2 voters

Kayfiyatlaringiz yaxshimi?

  1. Inshaallohnot shown
  2. Alhamdulillahnot shown

Results were not being shown when we read this poll, so no share was published for any option. That is not zero — it is an absence, and we record it as one.

21 Jul 2026, 19:02 UTCAnonymous Poll4 voters

Kayfiyatingiz yaxshimi?

  1. Inshaalloh50%

Shares as published, totalling 50%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

20 Jul 2026, 05:27 UTCAnonymous Poll4 voters

Kayfiyatingiz yaxshimi?

  1. Inshaalloh75%

Shares as published, totalling 75%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,436,932 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“NMU — Ummu MY & MA” (@MNU_ummu_MY_MA), 144 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MNU_ummu_MY_MA.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.