Channel
@MNENIE11
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003946636779 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @MNENIE11 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 31 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/MNENIE11 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 23:47 | 1 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:02 | 1 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (5 August 2026 – 14 August 2026) |
| Views total | 61 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Aug 2026, 23:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
➤ Мнение от Velvet — Пост на контрасте, невероятно интересует и цепляет. Задний план достаточно пёстрый, из-за чего хочется задержать на нем взгляд и рассмотреть внимательнее. Вставки с Тэхеном на таком фоне читаются лучше. Пост выглядит целостно, просто шик.
🥷Родной мой, как же мне не хватало твоих работ, правда. Очень хорошо сделал. Несмотря на такой насыщенный чб колор, можно рассмотреть все детали и фон, который очень красиво сочетается с общим стилем работы и выглядит действительно достойно. Делаешь невероятную красоту и удивляешь меня каждый раз.
броо, какой же ты талантливый а?, мой хороший ты так ахуенно сотворил этот пост. особенно фон, черно белый контраст меня вдохновил настолько что я обратно хочу вернуть в чб посты🤣🤣, снова тянет к этому. правда, шикарный образ персонажа потярсающе выполнен, залип.
Бля, родной, это очень ахуенно. Мне от души нравится твой стиль, работа сделана сногсшибательно. Ахуенно сделал фон, ничего лишнего и все между собой сочетается. Я восхищаюсь твоим стилем, это невъебенный пост.
Да ну, неужели черно-белая работа от тебя. Отвечаю, цветные работы в твоем исполнении безусловно хороши, а такие еще лучше. Невероятно зашла подложка к посту, она как единое целое с материалом, от этого визуал работы выглядит хорошо, более притягивающе. Туторы только так давай
а на это можно кнч?
Стильно сделал, вайб нереальный
Очень стильная работа, прям цепляет своей атмосферой. Чёрно-белая обработка, композиция и эти детали вместе смотрятся невероятно гармонично, выглядит одновременно хаотично и очень продуманно. Особенно нравится, как всё это собрано в один цельный вайб.
Господи боже мой, у меня на ваших постов не хватает слов, чтобы описать это всё. Задний фон – имба, мне понравилось что он идеально сочетается с передним, нет ничего лишнего. Бомбезный пост.
как же ахуенно, я в оргазме отвечаю
какой замечательный пост, вовремя зашла, особенно зацепил второй план, очень красиво
Стоит ли тут вообще произносить слова? Выглядит превосходно, родной.
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @MNENIE11. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“мнение от мью” (@MNENIE11), 1 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MNENIE11.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.