Channel
@MNAuditNews
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
124subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001235242218 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @MNAuditNews |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/MNAuditNews |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 18:58 | 124 | +1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 03:03 | 123 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:29 | 123 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 13 September 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 October 2021. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
🇺🇸💥🇺🇸 !!ATTENTION!! 🇺🇸💥🇺🇸 Let's start a letter blitz to the newly elected GOP Chairman. We want to congratulate him on his new position and implore him to do the right thing. Sample letter attached. We should all enthusiastically encourage David Hann to be on our side. As with the previous letter campaign, you can copy and sign the attached letter. I suggest adding a handwritten note. Or write your own letter. 🇺🇸🇺🇸💥🇺…
https://t.me/MNAuditChat/50685
Please sign the petition below to show that WE THE PEOPLE are united in restoring election and voter integrity to Minnesota. WE THE PEOPLE of MN want to ensure that our vote is being protected and we are demanding it to be proven with a Full Kinematic Forensic Audit of the 2020 Election. This is a non-biased, non-political effort being brought forth by the millions of disfranchised citizens of Minnesota, Wisconsin, &…
🙏🏻 LIVE PRAYER NOW 🙏🏻 JOIN US FOR LIVE PRAYERS FOR OUR NATION. https://t.me/AmericaFirstAuditsChat?voicechat
Minnesota Audit Channel pinned a video
Here's a 45-second video to share with your friends on other platforms. Election integrity matters. Democrats have been demanding integrity for decades. Why can't we, people who love this country, do the same? Down with the machines. #VoteAmish This is a community grassroots movement which depends on your ability to share this video with everyone you know. Cheers and Godspeed
Get involved people!! We need people helping with campaigns for off year elections. Mpls Mayor and city council, etc. We need Judges! We need you to get involved with your Senate District BPOUs to become delegates. This fight for election integrity is a multifaceted fight. If not you, than who?
Minnesota Audit Channel pinned a file
Here you go, Minnesota!
🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸RALLY DAY🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸 Don’t miss our President today in Georgia! You can watch LIVE all day. Trump should be on around 7pm EST. https://rumble.com/vi1or5-rsbn-live.html @AmericaFirstAudits @AmericaFirstAuditsChat
All forensic audit report documents and presentations that were revealed today to the Senate have been uploaded to the AZ Senate's website! Get it all right here at: https://www.azsenaterepublicans.com/audit
HERE IT IS FOLKS!!! 💪🇺🇸🦅🇺🇸
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @MNAuditNews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,453,168 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@MNAuditNews named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Minnesota Audit Channel” (@MNAuditNews), 124 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MNAuditNews.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.