Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for MLS_ASCP

Channel

MLS_ASCP

@MLS_ASCP

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

7,764subscribers

-144 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001007990583
TypeChannel
Username@MLS_ASCP
DescriptionThis channel helps medical laboratory personnel who want to pass the ASCP . For contact : @Eimanmgeed
CreatedBetween 1 September 2015 and 31 December 2015 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 November 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/MLS_ASCP

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@MLS_ASCP/1013 · this entry26 Sept 2021, 07:09 UTC@cphqexam/16026 Sept 2021, 07:09 UTC1.00under a minute
@cphqexam/1618 Oct 2021, 07:08 UTC@MLS_ASCP/1014 · this entry8 Oct 2021, 07:08 UTC1.00under a minute
@MLS_ASCP/1016 · this entry10 Oct 2021, 13:00 UTC@cphqexam/16310 Oct 2021, 13:00 UTC1.00under a minute
@cphqexam/16512 Oct 2021, 20:47 UTC@MLS_ASCP/1018 · this entry12 Oct 2021, 20:47 UTC1.00under a minute
@MLS_ASCP/1020 · this entry18 Oct 2021, 13:08 UTC@cphqexam/16718 Oct 2021, 13:08 UTC1.00under a minute
@MLS_ASCP/1022 · this entry20 Oct 2021, 18:42 UTC@cphqexam/16920 Oct 2021, 18:42 UTC1.00under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@cphqexam7 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (4–3)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 3 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 9 comparable posts for this entry, running 23 August 2021 to 25 February 2022. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @MLS_ASCP — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_mutual, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

7,7647,9087,8366 August 2026 — 7,908 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,908 subscribers9 August 2026 — 7,901 subscribers13 August 2026 — 7,898 subscribers16 August 2026 — 7,890 subscribers19 August 2026 — 7,882 subscribers23 August 2026 — 7,881 subscribers26 August 2026 — 7,873 subscribers29 August 2026 — 7,870 subscribers1 September 2026 — 7,863 subscribers4 September 2026 — 7,860 subscribers9 September 2026 — 7,848 subscribers13 September 2026 — 7,846 subscribers17 September 2026 — 7,839 subscribers25 September 2026 — 7,837 subscribers4 October 2026 — 7,817 subscribers11 October 2026 — 7,812 subscribers14 October 2026 — 7,800 subscribers18 October 2026 — 7,787 subscribers20 October 2026 — 7,785 subscribers23 October 2026 — 7,779 subscribers27 October 2026 — 7,776 subscribers30 October 2026 — 7,768 subscribers2 November 2026 — 7,767 subscribers5 November 2026 — 7,764 subscribers6 August 20265 November 2026
25 measurements spanning 90 days, net -144. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,742–7,930 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Nov 2026, 01:587,764-3
2 Nov 2026, 09:397,767-1
30 Oct 2026, 05:197,768-8
27 Oct 2026, 02:117,776-3
23 Oct 2026, 21:067,779-6
20 Oct 2026, 20:007,785-2
18 Oct 2026, 03:067,787-13
14 Oct 2026, 20:517,800-12
11 Oct 2026, 07:547,812-5
4 Oct 2026, 21:397,817-20
25 Sept 2026, 16:017,837-2
17 Sept 2026, 05:017,839-7
13 Sept 2026, 01:597,846-2
9 Sept 2026, 12:387,848-12
4 Sept 2026, 01:357,860-3
1 Sept 2026, 02:047,863-7
29 Aug 2026, 01:087,870-3
26 Aug 2026, 05:027,873-8
23 Aug 2026, 06:487,881-1
19 Aug 2026, 16:537,882first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 23 August 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 24 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 April 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
531
Videos
8
Links
176

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
17s
Average length
17s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Recent posts

28 Apr 2024, 23:55 UTC≈11,200 viewsread 5 November 2026

للتواصل مباشرة علي الواتس اب: https://api.whatsapp.com/send?phone=971568660262

19 Sept 2023, 14:24 UTC≈15,400 viewsread 5 November 2026

إنضموا لقناتي في الواتس اب لتتعلموا الكثير 🌹🌹 https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Va8vM6w1HspvtPa0wX3P

15 Oct 2022, 20:54 UTC≈22,000 viewsread 5 November 2026

كيف توثر مهارة الإلقاء على حياتك ؟! https://youtu.be/vKET2uCVeqA

25 Feb 2022, 10:40 UTC≈28,100 viewsread 5 November 2026

مساكم عافية موعدنا اليوم إن شاء الله في لايف للإجابة ع الأسئلة والإستفسارات . الساعة 9 مساءا بتوقيت الإمارات ، الساعة 7 مساءا بتوقيت السودان ، خليكم قراب 💜. Eiman Mgeed is inviting you to Join Zoom Meeting : Topic: عندك سؤال، إستفسار، أو مشكلة بخصوص الداتافلو أو تراخيص الإمارات ؟؟؟؟ Time: Feb 25, 7 مساءا بتوقيت الخرطوم ، 9 مساءا بتوقيت أبوظبي. https://us02web.zoom.us/j/87477603160?pwd=cGJMSFF0U2ZhalphbTBX…

22 Oct 2021, 08:43 UTC≈24,600 viewsread 5 November 2026
Video

لمشاهدة الفيديو كاملا : 🤣😂👇🏻👇🏻 https://youtu.be/702I31Ki0N4 إنتبه سؤال مهم جدا في الإمتحانات 🤫🚫🤫 ولا تنسوا الإشتراك بالقناة 🙏🏻

20 Oct 2021, 18:42 UTC≈23,300 viewsread 5 November 2026
Photo

#حملة_رد_الجميل #إدعموا_إيمان_مجيد بليز بليز بليز شير للبوست في صفحتك علشان تدعمني أدعموني في قناة اليوتيوب بالإشتراك وتفعيل الجرس 👏🏻 عاوزين نوصل 50 ألف مشترك 💪🏻 ، رابط قناة اليوتيوب : https://youtube.com/c/EimanMgeed https://youtube.com/c/EimanMgeed همتكم معانا وسوا حنقدر 😍😍😍 .

18 Oct 2021, 13:08 UTC≈18,800 viewsread 5 November 2026

https://youtu.be/l6R67eXotaU طريقة حجز إمتحان ال DHA بالخطوات من البداية للنهاية إمتحان هيئة الصحة دبي ، الإمارات العربية المتحدة . شاهد الفيديو ولا يفوتك الإسكتش اللي في البداية 🤫😅 https://youtu.be/l6R67eXotaU

12 Oct 2021, 20:47 UTC≈16,700 viewsread 5 November 2026

https://youtu.be/jxERBJq0rF0 كيفية التقديم لل DHA Data Flow بالخطوات من الألف للياء ، جيب ورقة وقلم وكباية شاي بلبن 😋 . 🎉🎊🎉🎊🎉🎊🎉🎊🎉🎊🎉 https://youtu.be/jxERBJq0rF0

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @MLS_ASCP. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“MLS_ASCP” (@MLS_ASCP), 7,764 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MLS_ASCP.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.