Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for MEV-X PROJECT Announcements Channel

Channel

MEV-X PROJECT Announcements Channel

@MEV_X_ann

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

648subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001974057006
TypeChannel
Username@MEV_X_ann
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live24 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 24 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/MEV_X_ann

Growth

6486526507 August 2026 — 652 subscribers8 August 2026 — 652 subscribers16 August 2026 — 650 subscribers24 August 2026 — 648 subscribers7 August 202624 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 17 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 647–653 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
24 Aug 2026, 23:45648-2
16 Aug 2026, 16:16650-2
8 Aug 2026, 02:46652no change
7 Aug 2026, 22:06652first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 14 July 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

180 reactions across 20 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
7541.7%
🔥4826.7%
👍4726.1%
31.67%
🏆31.67%
👏21.11%
😱10.556%
🤩10.556%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 180reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2024 to 18 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

18 May 2026, 13:24 UTC153 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

QuickSwap Integrates Homelander: MEV Internalization as a New Standard QuickSwap’s community voted to integrate Homelander as a backrunning MEV internalization plugin for their Algebra V4 pools. The vote produced a result that speaks for itself: 3.2 million QUICK in favor, zero in opposition, across the full duration of the Snapshot. There is something substantive here beyond the announcement. A governance vote that

7👍2🔥2

29 Apr 2026, 12:49 UTC178 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Homelander Is Expanding to Uniswap v4 🚀 We've received support from the Uniswap Foundation Security Fund - and we're deploying Homelander as a Uniswap v4 hook, bringing MEV internalization to the largest hook-compatible AMM ecosystem in DeFi! The Uniswap Foundation Security Fund exists to make security audits accessible to teams building on Uniswap v4. Our team received a grant from this fund for the Homelander hoo

6🔥3👍2

12 Jan 2026, 16:43 UTC291 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Homelander Security Audit: Summary and Outcomes We’ve completed our first independent security audit of MEV-X Homelander, conducted by Bailsec ⚡️ Homelander is an MEV internalization solution for DEXs, designed to handle post-swap MEV logic without interfering with core AMM execution. Audit summary: - No security vulnerabilities were identified in the reviewed contract; - Core focus areas included execution flow,

3🔥3👍1

27 Nov 2025, 11:09 UTC250 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

The Bidding Games: Reinforcement Learning for MEV Extraction We’ve spent a lot of time studying how MEV strategies work in practice, and we use that experience to explore their underlying mechanics through research! Sealed-bid auctions are widely used across blockchain systems, especially in contexts where multiple agents compete for the same opportunity, like atomic arbitrage. These auctions can occur at high freq

8🔥2

18 Nov 2025, 12:32 UTC216 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Arbitrage Routing as a Multi‑Surface Liquidity Optimization Decentralized exchanges have fragmented liquidity spread across multiple automated market maker pools. Each pool represents a distinct liquidity surface: a unique price-liquidity curve shaped by its invariant formula and fee tier. After any market move, these surfaces often disagree on price, creating arbitrage gaps. However, aligning prices is non-trivial:

7👍3🔥3

20 Jun 2025, 14:07 UTC307 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

ECDSA Nonce Reuse: Key Compromise via a Linear System In an effort to reduce signing latency in our MEV pipeline, we introduced a low-level optimization that compromised the security of our ECDSA setup — ultimately leading to the loss of funds from several wallets on Polygon. By reusing a precomputed nonce across multiple signers within a single batch, we unintentionally produced identical r values on-chain. That a

👍4🔥43🏆3

13 May 2025, 11:59 UTC277 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

CEX-DEX Arbitrage: Theory, Practice, and the Real Cost of Liquidity Arbitrage between centralized and decentralized exchanges is often framed as a straightforward profit opportunity — buy low on one venue, sell high on another. In reality, it reflects deep structural asymmetries between fast, private CEX infrastructure and open, asynchronous blockchains. This article examines CEX-DEX arbitrage not just as a trading

6🔥3👍2

5 Mar 2025, 10:41 UTC269 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

NFT Arbitrage: Exploiting Market Fragmentation for Maximum Profit The NFT market operates as a network of independent marketplaces rather than a unified exchange, resulting in fragmented liquidity and inconsistent pricing. Unlike traditional financial markets, where assets trade within a centralized system, NFTs are scattered across platforms like OpenSea, Blur, and LooksRare. This lack of synchronization leads to p

3👍3🔥3

21 Feb 2025, 12:15 UTC223 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

MEV-X is Taking the Next Step: Advancing MEV Protection on Polygon We are excited to announce that we have submitted a grant proposal within the Polygon ecosystem to advance MEV solving! Over the past two years, our research and extraction efforts have given us deep insight into the inefficiencies driving MEV. Now, we are shifting our focus toward addressing these challenges and creating a fairer, more predictable t

🔥5👍2

14 Feb 2025, 13:23 UTC243 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

MEV Trends on Polygon: A Study of Atomic Arbitrage We conducted an in-depth study of Maximum Extractable Value trends on the Polygon blockchain, focusing specifically on Atomic Arbitrage. By analyzing millions of blocks, we uncover a critical transition: MEV extraction is moving away from inefficient, volume-driven strategies toward structured solutions designed to align profitability with network health. The study

3🔥3👍2

17 Jan 2025, 11:35 UTC261 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

From Conflict to Harmony: Uniting MEV Extraction and Protection for Optimal Transactions Execution Maximal Extractable Value is both a challenge and an opportunity for the blockchain ecosystem. On the one hand, MEV extraction exploits inefficiencies in user transactions to generate profit through techniques such as liquidation and front-running. On the other hand, MEV protection shields users by optimizing their tra

👍42🔥1

11 Nov 2024, 12:48 UTC370 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Fastlane Atlas protocol x MEV-X: Setting a New Standard in Blockchain Transactions We are excited to announce the launch of the new Polygon Fastlane (PFL), powered by the groundbreaking Atlas protocol by Fastlane. This milestone is especially significant, as MEV-X has proudly become the first project to be launched on this innovative platform. Enhanced Security and Efficiency with Atlas This Atlas-powered version

4👍3🔥3😱1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @MEV_X_ann. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

23 Jul 2024, 13:26 UTCAnonymous Poll16 voters

How soon do you think the quantum era will arrive?

  1. It has already arrived13%
  2. Within the next 5 years31%
  3. In 5 to 10 years13%
  4. More than 10 years away38%
  5. It's unpredictable6%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2024 to 18 May 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“MEV-X PROJECT Announcements Channel” (@MEV_X_ann), 648 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MEV_X_ann.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.