Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 46% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
7 measurements spanning 39 days, net -27. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 509–544 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 11:18
513
-3
10 Sept 2026, 00:59
516
-12
1 Sept 2026, 02:08
528
-9
25 Aug 2026, 09:03
537
+1
17 Aug 2026, 11:35
536
-4
10 Aug 2026, 02:16
540
no change
9 Aug 2026, 23:46
540
first reading
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
10m 02s
Average length
1m 07s
Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
865 reactions across 16 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
278
32.1%
👍
185
21.4%
❤
174
20.1%
😁
100
11.6%
🥰
52
6.01%
🤩
41
4.74%
💯
35
4.05%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 865 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 18 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @MELDEY_MELDEY. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
#MELDEY_изделия
🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈
💕 В среде дизайнеров есть такое понятие «подиумная модель»
Это что-то очень красивое, сшитое в 1-2 экземплярах. Специально для показов
🥰 Честно скажу, я не хотела выкладывать в канал такие модели. Но к нам приехал организатор фестиваля «Мужчина и Женщина» Алексей, и мы не удержались – посмотрели на наше кимоно на стройном красивом мужчине!
⏩ Ну и тут же наша редактор настояла:
выложи, пока…
🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤
о котором я рассказала в посте выше – это не просто красивое и интересное мероприятие
🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰
дополнение – если вы сейчас думаете, идти туда или нет…
⏩ Каждый билет на этот фестиваль — это вклад в помощь больным детям
🥰% с продажи каждого билета на фестиваль «Мужчина и Женщина. Перезагрузка» будут переданы в благотворительный фонд «Энби»
⏩ «Энби» — первая в России организация родителей, созданная для по…
🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈
на который мы идём – и вас приглашаем, состоится в Петербурге
🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰
И это будет самый большой в России фестиваль об отношениях!
🌈Мы серьезно, это будет всероссийский рекорд!
🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈
🌈
🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈
Все подробности на сайте menwoman.ru
⏩ А я вам сейчас покажу человека, без которого не случилось бы этого фестиваля! Это его автор, основатель и генеральный продюсер, душа и сердце проекта – Алексей Петрухин…
#MELDEY_новости
🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈
Команда MELDEY_ВЫШЕ НЕБА от всего сердца благодарит любимый клуб
«Женская Тусовка»!
https://t.me/womenclub_spb
🌈 Спасибо основателям
@m_kruglova
и организаторам
@anna_marimonschik
за то, что доверили нам участие в показе на премии
«Женщина Года».
И особенно благодарим
@SvetlanaKlimkina
Нашего лучшего фотографа!!!
🌈 Это было вдохновляюще,
ярко и по-настоящему
ВЫШЕ НЕБА! ✨
🤩🤩🤩 - ЭТО НЕ КУРЬЕРСКАЯ СЛУЖБА, ДОСТАВИВШАЯ ТОЛЬКО БАБУШКИН НОС И ДЕДУШКИНО УПРЯМСТВО 📦
🤩Это целый дом. Огромный.
Можно ютиться в чулане старых обид, спотыкаясь о грабли, разбросанные поколениями.
❤️А можно закатать рукава, включить свет и найти на втором этаже библиотеку мудрости, а в подвале генератор силы.
❤️На интенсиве
«СИЛА РОДА» мы не просто поговорим
Мы за три дня:
💚Разберём родовые завалы:
- вытащим на …
🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰
🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩
Бабушка «случайно» передала вам не только серёжки, но и сценарий
«счастья нет, зато терпения вагон.
Яж сильная.
Я и лошадь, я и бык, я и баба и мужик»💪
Мама повторила её судьбу
А вы чувствуете:
что-то не так, но выбраться не получается.
Знакомо?
Это РОД
И у него к вам пара вопросов
Связь с предками, как вай-фай в глухой деревне. То ловит, то нет, но отключить невозможно
И, когда сигнал рвётся, мы …
А это мы красивые, после Фестиваля в обнимку
С Величайшим Мастером!!
Легендой в Мире моды!
Игорем Григориевичем Дадиани!!!
P.S. Он попросил нас, сшить ему Палто😉
#мир_MELDEY
🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤
🔤
🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤
🔘Вчера мы стали частью не просто показа, а настоящего искусства
«ПОЭЗИЯ МОДЫ».
💕
🥰 Это был тот редкий случай, когда уровень организации совпал с глубиной смысла
Хотим сказать огромное спасибо всей команде создателей и организаторов. За то, что собрали нас всех под одной крышей. За внимание к каждой мелочи и за ту самую атмосферу, в которой рождается прекрасное
💚 Отдельная благодарно…
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @MELDEY_MELDEY. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@MELDEY_MELDEY named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@scherbakova_natalya named in 1 post, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“MELDEY - ВЫШЕ НЕБА” (@MELDEY_MELDEY), 513 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MELDEY_MELDEY.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.