Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝐌𝐀𝐃𝐎̷𝐍(COMEBACK?¿)

Channel

𝐌𝐀𝐃𝐎̷𝐍(COMEBACK?¿)

@MADONSKIE

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

42subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002327070001
TypeChannel
Username@MADONSKIE
DescriptionThis is the work of my life. It’s my legacy. OWN: @n_axesi CHANNEL: @MADONSKIE
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 22 November 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/MADONSKIE

Growth

427 August 2026 — 42 subscribers10 August 2026 — 42 subscribers7 August 202610 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 3 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 41–43 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 17:3042no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:4542first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 22 November 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
15.7%
avg views ÷ 42 subscribers
Avg views / post
6.6
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
5
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held18 (22 November 20247 August 2026)
Views total33
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 17:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
10
Videos
2
Links
5

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
1m 19s
Average length
40s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

50 reactions across 5 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 14.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
714.0%
custom 5363872132126235887612.0%
custom 5366211463373415256612.0%
custom 5363900195442548255510.0%
custom 533027151204793546248.00%
custom 533043089828428864448.00%
🔥48.00%
custom 533052724299067428136.00%
custom 536423653862646516836.00%
custom 536639364729617662824.00%
custom 536645098081461162424.00%
custom 536659105687800012224.00%
custom 534608183642032296412.00%
custom 534617781175952021412.00%

Custom emoji. 12 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 50reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 22 November 2024 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 18 we hold a reading for · 11%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @MADONSKIE. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 November 2024 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 12:20 UTC6 viewsread 10 August 2026

ХАХААХХААХАХХА, Я НИНО.

Signed 𝐇. 𝐋𝐄𝐂𝐓𝐄𝐑

7 Aug 2026, 12:20 UTC2 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @CHANSKIOVideo

id: @tpaxch @MA1ESTE @FRDVSKK @HALOR1A @AMB2SFM @gwmskf @esscalades @POHUISTYFML @MADONSKIE надеюсь, вам понравился такой юмор.)

Signed 𝐇. 𝐋𝐄𝐂𝐓𝐄𝐑

7 Aug 2026, 09:21 UTC9 viewsread 10 August 2026

Мадон живёт только ради чановских, клянусь.

Signed 𝐇. 𝐋𝐄𝐂𝐓𝐄𝐑

7 Aug 2026, 09:20 UTC3 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @CHANSKIO

быстрый набор на интр: условия: рк, рп, в коммах юз тгк. мест: 8.

Signed 𝐇. 𝐋𝐄𝐂𝐓𝐄𝐑

29 Jul 2026, 14:48 UTC13 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @CHANSKIOVideo

🤩истинное богатство семьи измеряется не её именем, а людьми, которые это имя достойно несут🤩 @ssereenityy @esscalades @chasovskieworld @cazadorfml @SEXSLVR @HALOR1A @STR1NGERS @CONTINTL @dismal_clan @AMB2SFM @FRDVSKK @ASGARD_KLN @MADONSKIE @ZEYNALLOVI #CHANS_RP

Signed 𝐇. 𝐋𝐄𝐂𝐓𝐄𝐑

25 May 2026, 20:28 UTC100 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @CHANSKIO

быстрый набор на ассоц от – @tpaxch условия: рк, рп, ава и название вашего канала на англ/русс, только для союзников. мест: 6

Signed 𝐇. 𝐋𝐄𝐂𝐓𝐄𝐑

24 May 2026, 07:18 UTC106 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @CHANSKIOPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

Signed 𝐇. 𝐋𝐄𝐂𝐓𝐄𝐑

20 May 2026, 20:08 UTC258 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Сыновья, это что за шикарная перезагрузка?!! У меня аж глаза — звёздочки. Выглядит просто невероятно, стильно, атмосферно и очень в вашем вайбе. Вам безумно идёт это оформление!! Мамы вами гордятся, поздравляют и любят вас всем сердцем. Пусть эта перезагрузка принесёт вам ещё больше ярких моментов, сил, вдохновения и людей, которые будут рядом искренне и до самого конца!!!🤩🤩

3🔥2

Signed 𝐇. 𝐋𝐄𝐂𝐓𝐄𝐑

20 May 2026, 20:07 UTC88 viewsread 10 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

Signed 𝐇. 𝐋𝐄𝐂𝐓𝐄𝐑

15 May 2026, 21:00 UTC146 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Мадон — моё сокровище, мой дом и моя отдушина. Сегодня моей семье исполняется 4 года. И я одновременно безумно рад и немного опечален. Потому что, открывая Мадон, я вкладывал в неё всё своё тепло, всю преданность и ту часть души, которую обычно никому не показывают. Это было место, где я чувствовал себя свободно. Место, куда всегда хотелось возвращаться. Мадон — это не просто семья. Это люди, воспоминания, путь длино

3🔥2

Signed 𝐇. 𝐋𝐄𝐂𝐓𝐄𝐑

2 Sept 2025, 12:40 UTC987 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 Набор открыт в папки: актив, актив+рп, вз. Набор в папку рп ограничен. 🤩 Канал: @MADONSKIE 🤩 Следящий: @WE11GE 🤩 Папки: актив+рп, актив, вз. Папка рп: 9/10 мест. 🤩 Подписка: 1×1 🤩 4×4 #𝐌𝐃𝐍_𝐌𝐄𝐆𝐀𝐑𝐏

Signed Wergester||own mdn

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @MADONSKIE. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 720,692 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝐌𝐀𝐃𝐎̷𝐍(COMEBACK?¿)” (@MADONSKIE), 42 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MADONSKIE.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.