...and then suddenly it started raining like crazy! 😂💦 🦊 Kitavos 🇩🇪 Stuttgart Pride 2025 🏳️🌈
❤13

Channel
@LunosWolf
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
294subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001184626695 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @LunosWolf |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/LunosWolf |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:47 | 294 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:33 | 294 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 23 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
129 reactions across 16 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 78 | 60.5% | |
| ❤🔥 | 16 | 12.4% | |
| 🔥 | 13 | 10.1% | |
| 👍 | 9 | 6.98% | |
| 🥰 | 6 | 4.65% | |
| 🤗 | 5 | 3.88% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.775% | |
| 😎 | 1 | 0.775% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 129reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 23 October 2025 to 12 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
...and then suddenly it started raining like crazy! 😂💦 🦊 Kitavos 🇩🇪 Stuttgart Pride 2025 🏳️🌈
❤13
Here's a group picture I took at Stuttgart pride back in 2025. Is anyone in here also attending this years' Stuttgart pride on July, 25th? 🇩🇪 Stuttgart Pride 2025 🏳️🌈
❤4
Have another close-up shot of Mantra. :3 🐈⬛ Mantra 🇩🇪 Private Photostudio
❤8
I really enjoyed taking pictures in my private photostudio at my place. 🥰 🐈⬛ Mantra 🇩🇪 Private Photostudio
❤11
This is Mantra - a Yaoguai suit who had a really nice style in my opinion. 🐈⬛ Mantra 🇩🇪 Private Photostudio
❤5👍1
Have another picture from the Suitwalk in Tübingen! This is Thunder and he's worn by his maker Marlonade who created the species which is called Flawkee! I've always looked up to artists who are so creative to even create their own species! 🐈 Thunder (Marlonade) 🇩🇪 Tübingen Suitwalk 2026
❤6
Here's a picture I took at the last Fursuitwalk I've been to. Doesn't this moo just look super sassy? Highland cows are the best! 🐮 Twizzarak 🇩🇪 Tübingen Suitwalk 2026
❤🔥16❤2👍1
This picture was taken during a lightsaber shoot I did during Pawska. It's a smaller con in Poland which recently opened it's registration. In case you want more information on the con, feel free to visit their website. 🦊 Ami Blue Fox 🇵🇱 Pawska 2025
❤4
So for the first post in this setting: Meet Desmond! He's an energetic (and obviously cool) deer and I got to meet him first at Gdakon 2024 in Poland. This picture shows him enjoying the sun. <3 🦌 Desmond 🇵🇱 Futerkon 2025
❤7
Okay so as it seems I'm gonna go by selected highlights :3 Let's hope I can at least keep actively posting here 😅 (I'm super inactive on social media in general. I know it's kinda important but I can't find enough motivation to do this on a regular basis 😇)
👍2
What do you prefer?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Hey everyone! First of all, sorry for the long silence since last year. — I’ve been busy with events and projects that needed my full attention. Things are settling down again soon and I’m looking forward to sharing more photos with you then. 📸 I’ve been thinking about changing how I post my photos here. Instead of uploading all edited pictures, I’m considering switching to a more curated format: • Selected highli…
❤5👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @LunosWolf. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
What do you prefer?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 23 October 2025 to 12 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 174,578 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Lunos' Pictures” (@LunosWolf), 294 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/LunosWolf.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.