Channel
@Lumeipingjia
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
124subscribers
-22 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003944162951 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Lumeipingjia |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 14 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Lumeipingjia |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 15:26 | 124 | -16 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 22:31 | 140 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:11 | 140 | -6 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:46 | 146 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 14 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 14 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (14 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 4,281 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 22:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
2 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
深圳·撸妹学院出击报告模板 telegram.me/sz88j 【验证留名】: 赵完松 【验证时间】：8.6 【老师艺名】: 牛奶 【联系账号】：@Yjlsnn 【所在位置】：南山 【上课费用】：1400 【服务内容】：普通课+🐍💋 【服务详情】：留意老师很久了，今天出击。遥控到位置后见到老师，人照一致，没有失望。直接加了贰佰🐍💋调情。交学费后开始课程。 上来先在客厅镜子前来个即尺，太色了。随后老师带我到房间，选战袍后洗澡，战袍眼花缭乱，随便选了套豹纹的，随后边聊天老师边帮我洗澡。洗的时候会再口一下，真是太爽了。 洗完后老师然后我在她的平板上选AV，我随便选了一部，我们还交流了一下女优。 随后就开始，这里不多写了，该有的都有，自己体验吧。我甚至觉得是老师在控制时间，让我体验感很好，果然经验老道。 总之，老师不催钟，情绪价值到位，技术满分，很主动，全程体验感很好，包会返的。 【优点缺点】：超出预期 【满分5.0分】：4.5 …
深圳·撸妹学院出击报告模板 telegram.me/sz88j 【验证留名】:千人斩（持续努力中） 【验证时间】：8月1日 【老师艺名】：小怡 【联系账号】：@yyy66116 【上课费用】：800p 【服务内容】：陪洗、胸推、口 【服务详情】：今天群里听说老师有活动。这必须狠狠支持一波了。下班直接打车出发，课室位置很好找，简单明了。开门就看到老师在等了，直接眼前一亮。果然还得是嫩妹，加上新染的头发。直接敬礼🫡。简单聊下天开始洗澡。迫不及待上床以后直接叫她吹。必须得交牛牛欣女上起手，一段时间不见，牛牛欣体力变好了。女上摇得我受不了，马上换我来，传教士起手开桩，中途换了几个姿势，成功桩到够钟发射。 【优点缺点】：优点：紧、紧、紧、嫩、嫩、嫩。还得是嫩妹，一个字紧 缺点：没什么乱七八糟的服务。 【满分5.0分】：4.6（每次我桩得时候感觉她比我还爽） 🎀温馨提示：以上仅代表个人体验，报告仅供参考！！ ʀᴏʙᴏᴛᴍᴀᴋᴇ
深圳·撸妹学院出击报告模板 telegram.me/sz88j 【验证留名】:匿 【验证时间】：2026.08.03 【老师艺名】：小米 【联系账号】：@yuyoi 【上课费用】：800 【颜值相似】：9 【身材身高】:160左右？ 【胸器罩杯】:c 【服务态度】:无敌 【服务内容】：还有的全都有 【服务详情】：第一次刷到老师的课表惊呆了，简直超人来的，抱着怀疑的态度来试探一下，服气了。一进门被老师追着摸，情绪价值拉满，热情大方，又骚又可爱，把我按在椅子上口，乳胶也好爽，全程都聊的很爽，情绪价值拉满，可惜由于本人体质不敏感导致前戏服务少了些乐趣，进入正题后也是无可挑剔，一边听着老师的顶级叫床一边享受老师的顶级肉体，很快就被老师夹的受不了缴枪了。事后还赶上老师在准备午饭，吃到老师投喂的美食，感受到了老师的母性(? 总而言之，享受过之后正常的左爱都满足不了了！ 【推荐程度】：9 🎀温馨提示：以上仅代表个人体验，报告仅供参考！…
深圳·撸妹学院出击报告模板 telegram.me/sz88j 【验证留名】:jo 【验证时间】：8月2日 【老师艺名】：兔宝宝 【联系账号】：@mingqwer 【所在位置】：南山 【上课费用】：p 【服务内容】：xcz 【服务详情】： 终于约上了，见面人照基本一致，有纹身，交水费，有陪洗，精洗下面，有一次性浴巾，擦干上床，舌吻，然后口，口感还是不错的，一会就带套女上，确实是紧的，之前出击的老师好像都没有她紧，，屌感好，然后换传教士了，真的是有点紧，没一会我就123了 有点尴尬，。 【优点缺点】：优点：还得是嫩妹，一个字紧 全程配合 缺点： 【满分5.0分】：5 🎀温馨提示：以上仅代表个人体验，报告仅供参考！！ ʀᴏʙᴏᴛᴍᴀᴋᴇ
深圳·撸妹学院出击报告模板 telegram.me/sz88j 【验证留名】:Rider 【验证时间】：8月2日下午 【老师艺名】：小甜心 【联系账号】：@tianxincpdd 【所在位置】：坂田 【上课费用】: 600 【颜值相似】：9 【身材身高】:160 【胸器罩杯】:34b 【服务态度】:非常好 【服务详情】：被老师遥控指挥上楼出电梯就到了，很方便老师服务，很热情。身材非常好。非常柔软，。确认没问题之后就开始洗澡。全程非常自动，感觉我像废人一样都没问题。是体力非常好。搞了好久，水非常多，值得一试，下次我还得再体验一下。 【优点缺点】：无缺点 【推荐程度】：9分 🎀温馨提示：以上仅代表个人体验，报告仅供参考！ ʀᴏʙᴏᴛᴍᴀᴋᴇ ʀᴏʙᴏᴛᴍᴀᴋᴇ
深圳·撸妹学院出击报告模板 telegram.me/sz88j 【验证留名】: 土豆🥔 【验证时间】：8月2 【老师艺名】：露露 【联系账号】：@xhz1242 【上课费用】：1400 【颜值相似】：9成 【身材身高】:163左右 【胸器罩杯】:b+ 【服务态度】: 热情，态度很好 【服务内容】：课表都有 【服务详情】：隔天和老师沟通好，第二天偷鸡出去上课。一进门见样子人照不大，频道上多了美白效果，五官还是频道上相差不大。交完水费老师带入帮洗环节，洗得好干净仲用牙膏洗后门，浴室有调情水中箫。老师会所出身，上床哈气、鼻吸、过水、指滑通通都有，真像去95一样。全自动的享受，我只负责躺下就行。然后水特别多，又润真的。毒🐉真系毒到我快升天，而且老师口萧无齿感，老师不亏会所出身。真系一套流程下来，神仙都企吾稳。老师的努力下，成功出水，然后继续返去上班。 优点：情绪价值高、服务系老师、颜值不错、皮肤紧绷不松弛 缺点： 总体：服务系老师、…
深圳·撸妹学院出击报告模板 telegram.me/sz88j 『课室坐标』：#南山 『老师昵称』：#牛奶 『老师电报』：@Yjlsnn 『学生留名』：匿名 『学习日期』：8.2 『上课费用』：1p 1400 『颜值身材』：高颜值极品身材 『体验过程』：跟妹妹约好时间，快马加鞭赶到现场，课室环境还行，见到妹妹化了艳丽的妆容，穿着宽松睡衣，里面没有穿bra，我一手抓住她的奶子，使劲揉了两下，非常柔软且弹性足，手感超级好，她用骚气的眼神盯着我说，死鬼，对我温柔点好吗，我淫荡的笑了笑说，我对你是最温柔不过了，接着给她递了根荷花，她看不上，接着她抽起自己的纯境，我才想起来半年不见的她，还是没变，依旧那么专一，坐在沙发上抽着烟聊了一会抓了几下奶子交费一起去洗澡，妹妹的身材真是极品，屁股很翘，在卫生间用我小鸡鸡在妹妹的股沟上来回摩擦，这感觉很爽，洗完上床抱在一起亲密，慢慢调情，蛇吻舔奶子，妹妹口活依然很好，巴适得很，口得硬邦邦带套开干，…
深圳·撸妹学院出击报告模板 telegram.me/sz88j 『课室坐标』：#南山 『老师昵称』：#冰冰 『老师电报』：@nnk55688 『学生留名』：杜老二 『学习日期』：7.28 『上课费用』：1299p 『颜值身材』：人照基本一致 『体验过程』：真人比照片更好看，上学没谈恋爱的有福了。闲聊一会就一起脱衣洗澡，很嫩有点惊喜，刚好后面有一个全身镜，正反面都看得清清楚楚，身材非常哇塞。可惜丝袜洗了，有点遗憾，但妹妹找出其他服装。紧接着躺下开始享受妹妹服务，蛇纹，舔咪咪，口活69，妹妹全身是宝，紧接着女上起手，换两个姿势传教士出水。不得不说传教士非常舒服，一览无余，边做边亲妹妹。可惜遇到可爱妹妹本人也有点腼腆好多姿势没解锁，只能下次再战，休息一会跟妹妹相拥离去。 『优点缺点』：嫩！态度颜值高，很配合。 『推荐程度』：9 （10分为满分） 『综合评分』: 9（10分为满分） 只接受真实出击报告，杜绝假报告，报告仅…
❤1
深圳·撸妹学院出击报告模板 telegram.me/sz88j 『课室坐标』：#南山 『老师昵称』：#娜米 『老师电报』：@nami03nami 『学生留名』：Kaminsky 『学习日期』：7-19 『上课费用』：1500（半价） 『颜值身材』：8 『体验过程』： 跟真人差不多只有7分的差距吧，看介绍有170但是过去就是160差不多，胸还可以有d加，服务的话该有的都有。口活还不错，屁股比较翘，后入比较爽。老师比较耐桩后入也比较爽。 『优点缺点』：胸屁股比较大，但是身高一般。 『推荐程度』：8 （10分为满分） 『综合评分』: 10（10分为满分） 只接受真实出击报告，杜绝假报告，报告仅供参考，理性出击 只接受榜单上老师的报告，报告必须按照规格填写，提供出击证明 ———————————————————————
深圳·撸妹学院出击报告模板 telegram.me/sz88j 『课室坐标』：#福田 『老师昵称』：#舒艺 『老师电报』： @yuyulail 『学生留名』：李离 『学习日期』：7.19 『上课费用』：999 『颜值身材』：胸大 匀称 『体验过程』：位置地点很好找，公寓楼 环境很温馨 复试 初见老师就是那种邻居人妻的感觉，很温柔，见面给水费 陪浴 还有水中啸。上床之后服务流程拉满，先进行简单按摩 后面跟会所流程基本一致 吃惯了嫩妹三件套 突然尝试这么细致的服务有点受宠若惊的感觉。 最后状态比较好 做了挺久才出水 老师也没有催促 体位也是随意更换 『推荐程度』：这个价位 这个服务 挺顶的 『综合评分』:9.5（10分为满分） 只接受真实出击报告，杜绝假报告，报告仅供参考，理性出击 只接受榜单上老师的报告，报告必须按照规格填写，提供出击证明 —————————————————————— ʀᴏʙᴏᴛ…
深圳·撸妹学院出击报告模板 telegram.me/sz88j 『课室坐标』：#宝安上门 『老师昵称』：#嘉怡 『老师电报』： @xyanbao 『学生留名』：吉祥 『学习日期』：7月19号 『上课费用』：1999pp 『颜值身材』：10分 『体验过程』：到深圳出差，在群里面观察了半个月，今天下午翻到老师，打开频道翻看，发现是我喜欢的类型，嫩妹爱好者，感觉控，喜欢这种有初恋女友感的老师， 老师也是一个感觉控，也是也特别享受做爱的过程，做的很舒服，口是很认真，还有深喉，爽飞天。老师下面也很干净，粉嫩，水也挺多的😋。也不催，值得打卡👍 『优点缺点』：体验感不错 『推荐程度』：9 （10分为满分） 『综合评分』: 9（10分为满分） 只接受真实出击报告，杜绝假报告，报告仅供参考，理性出击 只接受榜单上老师的报告，报告必须按照规格填写，提供出击证明 ——————————————————————— ʀᴏʙᴏᴛᴍᴀᴋᴇ
深圳·撸妹学院出击报告模板 telegram.me/sz88j 『课室坐标』：#福田 『老师昵称』：#香香 『老师电报』：@gmboluo 『学生留名』：冰美式 『学习日期』：2026.07.17 『上课费用』：650p(半价券) 『颜值身材』： 身高 165左右，身材高挑，比例好看，嫩妹子，人照 9.8 『体验过程』：约好时间，老师主动热情，说话很温柔，给一种气质型女人，给老师穿上带的制服，太劲爆了，特别好看，躺在床上，与老师暧昧几分，老师非常配合，小穴紧致，非常嫩红，很好看，一边轻吻老师的波点，手抚摸小穴，极致曼妙的体验，最终倒在了女上位，特别好评的一次体验 『优点缺点』：人照一致，服务态度好，说话温柔细语，非常热情耐心，服务到位 『推荐程度』：10推荐 『综合评分』:9.8（10分为满分） ✅报告提交给群内管理： 只接受真实出击报告，杜绝假报告，报告仅供参考，理性出击 只接受榜单上老师的报告，报告必须按照规格…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Lumeipingjia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 192,624 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“撸妹学校出击报告（免费上榜）” (@Lumeipingjia), 124 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Lumeipingjia.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.