Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

备用频道.深圳开.白露baby🌹🉑️SM剧本🉑️69🉑️🐍🉑️3P

@Lulubaby520666

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,913subscribers

-434 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002663346091
TypeChannel
Username@Lulubaby520666
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Lulubaby520666

Growth

1,9132,3472,13012 August 2026 — 2,347 subscribers12 August 2026 — 2,347 subscribers15 August 2026 — 1,913 subscribers12 August 202615 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 4 days, net -434. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,848–2,412 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 20:541,913-434
12 Aug 2026, 02:152,347no change
12 Aug 2026, 00:462,347first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.79%
avg views ÷ 1,913 subscribers
Avg views / post
111
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
10
of 10 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held10 (4 August 202610 August 2026)
Views total997
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 00:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 13:32 UTC42 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @Lulubaby520888Photo

回深圳第一天上课就是吃喝玩乐🎡🎢🎠 今天早夜课🈵 一会儿和GG去看期待已久的电影🎥🎞【八仙!】暑期档最高分10分🧏‍♀ 期待 期待ing 吼吼😮‍💨😮‍💨😮‍💨@Lulubaby520520

Signed 深圳开.深圳南山🌹白露baby

6 Aug 2026, 08:14 UTC146 viewsread 12 August 2026

生理期休假中ing♨️10号深圳见🎫@Lulubaby520520

Signed 深圳🌹白露baby.红休中

6 Aug 2026, 08:09 UTCviews —

Channel name was changed to «备用频道.深圳开.白露baby🌹🉑️SM剧本🉑️69🉑️🐍🉑️3P»

6 Aug 2026, 03:30 UTC120 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @Lulubaby520888

昨天晚上做金融的GG是真的帅 身材颜值完全不输淮海国际💌💌💌🎉🎉🎉🐾🐾🐾💥💥💥😡😡

Signed 杭州开🌹白露baby

6 Aug 2026, 03:22 UTC115 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @Lulubaby520888Photo

一觉醒来今天生理期红休啦!🍫🌰 可能昨天晚上干太猛 提前几天把姨妈都干出来啦🥳🥳🥳 昨天晚上很开心和两个杭州顶帅GG渡过了一个美妙的夜晚🌃🎆三人行刺激 好玩又nice🏟🎡 相信昨天晚上终将成为我们彼此美好的回忆🥰🥰❤️❤️❤️(现在想起唯一的遗憾就是忘记拍照秀他的身材胸肌) 当时就顾着投入的爱爱啦💥 总之彼此投入的享受就是Doi的最高境界👅👅👅❤️❤️❤️@Lulubaby520520

Signed 杭州开🌹白露baby

5 Aug 2026, 05:24 UTC113 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @Lulubaby520888Photo

深圳最快这周末就回来🤍🤍露宝baby知道已经好久没在深圳好好开过课啦🥰🥰让深圳的哥哥们等太久了 回去我会好好策划一下深圳的活动方案🎨🎬 毕竟深圳是我的大本营 也是我梦开始的地方🌆😮‍💨@Lulubaby520520

Signed 杭州开🌹白露baby

4 Aug 2026, 11:06 UTC119 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @Lulubaby520888Photo

杭州明天5号下午🉑约 明天晚上🈵 定金约课:@Lulubaby520520 双向限制:@Lulubaby520bot

Signed 杭州开🌹白露baby

4 Aug 2026, 08:02 UTC95 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @HshdhbdgsuPhoto

🥐艺名:#白露baby 🌎位置:#拱墅区 🍔价格: 套餐一: 1p-1200💵45分钟 pp-2000💵70分钟 服务内容:陪浴🛁调情💖水中萧🥵 指滑👋 胸推😌 漫游😛 裸吹😌 深喉💋 制服诱惑💃 啪啪 套餐二:SM+剧本杀 1p-1588💵60分钟 pp-2588💵100分钟 服务内容:陪浴 水中萧 调情💃 裸吹 深喉 指滑 胸推 臀推 漫游刮痧 八式吹萧 69 舍吻 海底捞月 制服丝袜滴蜡 捆绑 乳夹 跳蛋 AV棒 日本锁精环。 啪啪 肛塞 按摩 🉑调教 🉑角色🉑女王🉑3P 🉑强奸 🉑捆绑🉑言辱🉑车震 制服丝袜 高跟鞋 丁字裤 解锁各种姿势激情啪啪 👅😋💃🥵💃🥵😲☺️👅🍒🩲🩲🍒🍒🌰💋🥵🥰🍑🥰🍑 下午茶包时: 3000💵2小时 不限次 3600💵3小时 不限次 4200💵4小时 不限次 5000💵5小时 不限次 包夜: 晚夜课 4500💵23:30-8:30 三次 早夜课6000💵19点-11:30 不限 包天:88

Signed 杭州开🌹白露baby

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @Lulubaby520666. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 972,464 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“备用频道.深圳开.白露baby🌹🉑️SM剧本🉑️69🉑️🐍🉑️3P” (@Lulubaby520666), 1,913 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Lulubaby520666.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.