Channel
@Loverofthemessenger
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,163subscribers
+19 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002007277539 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Loverofthemessenger |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 30 April 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 28 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 28 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Loverofthemessenger |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 28 Aug 2026, 10:44 | 1,163 | +1 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 13:27 | 1,162 | +4 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 12:04 | 1,158 | +3 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 21:08 | 1,155 | -2 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 19:56 | 1,157 | +14 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 19:11 | 1,143 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 21:00 | 1,144 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 20:47 | 1,144 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 16 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 4 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (16 June 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 629 |
| Reactions total | 18 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 21:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
105 reactions across 14 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 88.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 93 | 88.6% | |
| 🥰 | 11 | 10.5% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 0.952% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 105reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
ረሱሉን ﷺ ከሪም 💚 በአንድ ወቅት ረሱለላህ ﷺ ዘንድ አንድ ሰሐቢይ ይመጣና የሚበላ ነገር እስኪያጣ እንደተቸገረ ይነግራቸዋል። በሰዓቱ ቤታቸው ውስጥ ምንም የሚበላ ነገር የሌላቸው የኛ ብርሓን ባልደረቦቻቸውን ጠየቁ። «በኔ ፋንታ ይህን እንግዳዬን የሚያስተናግድልኝ ማነው?» በማለት ጠየቁ። የዛኔ የቤቱን ሁኔታ ሳያውቅ አፍቃሪያቸው አቡ ጦልሓ «እኔ ያ ረሱለላህﷺ» አለ። እንግዳቸውንም ቤት ይዞት ሄደና ሚስቱን የሚበላ ካለ ጠየቃት። ለልጆቹ ብቻ የሚበቃ ምግብ እንጂ ምንም እንደሌለ ነገረችው! አቡ ጦልሓ'ም የውዴታውን እና የክብሩን ጥግ የሚያሳይ ንግግር ተናገረ። «ልጆቹን እያለቀሱም ቢሆን ቀደም ብለሽ፤ ቀስ ብለሽ አባብለሽ አስተኛቸው፤ ከዛም ኩራዙን አጥፍተሽ …
❤5
Signed Nadia.B
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed Nadia.B
ሒራ'ን ጠይቁት 💚 የአላህ መልዕክተኛ ﷺ ወህዩ ከመምጣቱ በፊት ቀን በቀን እውን የሚሆኑ ህልሞችን መመልከት ጀመሩ። አያታቸው አብዱልሙጠሊብ አግኝተውታል ተብሎ ወደሚነገርለት የጋሩ ሂራ ዋሻ መገለልንም መረጡ። አንዳንዴ ለሳምንታት፤ አንዳንዴም ለወራቶች ይቆዩ ነበር ይላሉ። ይህንን የመገለል ተግባር «التحنث» ይሉታል። ልክ እንደ እናታችን ኸዲጃ አጎት ወረቃ ወደ አንድ አምላክ ብቻ ተቅጣጩ። ጥሞናን መረጡ። ከማህበረሰቡ ተገለው ማስተንተንን ወደዱ 💚 የጋሩ ሂራ ዋሻ ልክ እንደሌላ ዋሻ ሰፊ ቀዳዳ ያለው አይነት ሳይሆን አንድ ሰው ብቻ የሚያስቀምጥ ነበር፤ ወደ ከዓባ'ም የዞረ መሆኑ ይበልጥ አስደናቂ ያደርግዋል። ዋሻው ካለበት ተራራ በታች ከዓባ ግልፅ ሆኖ ደምቆ…
❤11
Signed Nadia.B
Photo, posted without a caption
❤2
Signed Nadia.B
ባልደረቦቻቸው ﷺ 💚 የሁደይቢያ ስምምነት አውርቼም ሰምቼም የማልጠግበው የሲራ ክፍል ነው። እያንዳንዱ ክስተት የሚሰጠው lesson በየጊዜው ይለያያል።... ሚስጥሩ አይዘለቅም! ... እንደሚታወቀው ሐቢበላህ በህልማቸው ሐጅ እያደረጉ ሲመለከቱ ባልደረቦቻቸውን ዘንድሮ ሐጅ እንደሚያደርጉ አሳውቀው ለጉዞ እንዲዘጋጁ አዘዙ። በድር ላይ መስዋዕትነት ለመክፈል ወደኃላ ያላሉት፤ ኡሁድና አህዛብ ላይ ከጎናቸው ያልተለዩት ሰሐቦች አሁንም ውዱ መልዕክተኛቸውን በመታዘዝ ኢህራማቸውን ለብሰው ወደ መካ ጉዞ ጀመሩ። ወደ ትውልድ ሐገራቸው የመመለስ ጉጉት፤ ሲናፍቁት የቆዩት ጊዜ መሆኑ ይበልጥ ደስ የሚል ስሜት ውስጥ ከቷቸዋል። ነገር ግን ጉዳዩ በተቃራኒ ሆኖ ሁደይቢያ ላይ ሰፍረው…
❤9
Signed Nadia.B
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed Nadia.B
ሰላሜ: ወዳጄ ﷺ ያ ረሱለላህ! ﷺ , የኔ ውድ መልዕክተኛ ﷺ, Our soul was designed to love you. to praise you. to know you. to be lost in your divine beauty, to feel the peace by calling your name day to night, to see you in our dreams 🥰💚 የረሱለላህﷺ ፍቅር ህይወትን ያበራል በዚያው ልክም እርሳቸውን መናፈቁ የማይረግብ ሸውቅ ውስጥ ይከታል። ህመም'ም አለው። ሰውባኑ ትዝ አላችሁ? ሐቢበላህ'ን ለቀናቶች ባይመለከት የገረጣው፤ ፊቱ የተለወጠው፤ የናፍቆት፤ የፍቅር ህመም የታመመው ሰውባን ትዝ አላችሁ?.. ሐቢበላህﷺ ሲያገኙት ሁኔታውን አይተው ምን እንደሆነ …
❤13
Signed Nadia.B
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed Nadia.B
ስማቸው ﷺ ብቻውን ተዓምር ነው 💚 እናታችን ኡሙ ሰለማ እጅግ በጣም የምትወደውን ባለቤቷን አቡ ሰለማን በሞ*ት ካጣች በኃላ የብዙ ሰዎችን የትዳር ጥያቄ እምቢ አለች። ከአቡ ሰለማ የበለጠ ማን አለ'ም አለች። የዚህን ጊዜ የከውኑ ብርሓን የሆኑት ነብይ ለትዳር ጠየቋት። መልዕክተኛውም ﷺ ካገቧት ከቆይታ በኃላ ኡሙ ሰለማ እንዲህ አለች: "فقد أبدلني الله بأبي سلمة خيرا منه رسول الله" «አላህ ከአቡ ሰለማ በላቀ ሰው ካሰኝ(ሸለመኝ)፤ የአላህ መልዕክተኛ'ን።» በማለት ትመሰክራለች። በእዚህ ሰበብ'ም አገልጋይዋ የነበረውን ትክክለኛ ስሙ ወይ ረባሕ፣ ወይም ሚህራን ወይም ደግሞ ሩማን የሆነን ሸፊዒ በአንድ አጋጣሚ ሰፊና የሚል ስያሜ የሰጡ…
❤8
Signed Nadia.B
Photo, posted without a caption
🥰3
Signed Nadia.B
ኢማሙል ሙተቂንﷺ : ሸፊዓል ሙዝኒቢን ﷺ 💚 ሐቢበላህ ኢማም ናቸው፣ የከውኑ ሰይድ ናቸው፣ የአምላካችን ተወዳጅ ናቸው ግን ለይሉን እግራቸው ውሃ እስኪቋጥር ይቆማሉ፤ ጌታቸውን ይማፀናሉ፣ ለህዝባቸው ያለቅሳሉ። ደግሞ'ም ብዙ አጋጣሚዎች ላይ ዘይኔ ይራባሉ። ከሰሐቦቻቸው ጋር ሆነው ምግብ ፍለጋ ሆዳቸውን በድንጋይ አስረው ረሃባቸውን ያስታግሳሉ። ሩሂ ፊዳክ ያ ነቢየላህ ﷺ 😭 ሐቢበላህ ኢማም ናቸው፣ የከውኑ ሰይድ ናቸው፣ የአምላካችን ተወዳጅ ናቸው ግን ለይሉን እግራቸው ውሃ እስኪቋጥር ይቆማሉ፤ ጌታቸውን ይማፀናሉ፣ ለህዝባቸው ያለቅሳሉ። ደግሞ'ም ብዙ አጋጣሚዎች ላይ ዘይኔ ይራባሉ። ከሰሐቦቻቸው ጋር ሆነው ምግብ ፍለጋ ሆዳቸውን በድንጋይ አስረው ረሃባቸውን ያሳልፋሉ…
❤9
Signed Nadia.B
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed Nadia.B
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Loverofthemessenger. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 761,002 of 1,628,524entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Lover of the Messenger ﷺ” (@Loverofthemessenger), 1,163 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Loverofthemessenger.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.