3 measurements spanning 8 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 435–436 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Aug 2026, 02:53
436
+1
8 Aug 2026, 05:17
435
no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:32
435
first reading
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 26 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
36s
Average length
18s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
711 reactions across 16 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5345864141707943668
159
22.4%
custom 5262773798888829255
157
22.1%
custom 5346089481462095285
102
14.3%
custom 5886505837425334603
58
8.16%
custom 5345917098654705396
46
6.47%
custom 5958454807445378686
46
6.47%
custom 5197434302500970256
38
5.34%
custom 5346099823743346885
36
5.06%
custom 5260618992321584543
26
3.66%
custom 5246948502260447222
18
2.53%
custom 5285459000102508954
17
2.39%
custom 5258513423259423543
8
1.13%
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 711reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 26 April 2026 to 3 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
12
across the posts below
Posts paid on
12
of 16 we hold a reading for · 75%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @LoveRafayel. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 April 2026 to 3 May 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠
От админа: Любимые мои рыбки!🧸
Хотела бы искренне поблагодарить каждую из вас за вашу поддержку 〰️ за бусты, реакции и вашу любовь к Рафаэлю. Именно благодаря вам этот канал развивался.
К сожалению, по личным обстоятельствам я вынуждена приостановить работу этого канала в Telegram, но у нас есть альтернативный канал во ВКонтакте, где периодически будут появляться новые посты.
+ ещё у нас есть чат в тг 🤩 с…
✨💜🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩💜✨
Он готов часами смотреть, как ты спишь рядом с ним! 😊
🥰 Источник
❤️ BOOST CHANNEL
🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩
#Рафаэль #арт #lads
#loveanddeepspace #канал@LoveRafayel
🤩〰️〰️🔠🤩🤩🤩🤩🔠〰️〰️🤩
Как вам новая карта, рыбки? Уже успели прочитать?
Рассказывайте о своих впечатлениях🥰
❤️ Источник
⚡️ BOOST CHANNEL
🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩
#Рафаэль #видео #lads #loveanddeepspace #канал@LoveRafayel
🤩〰️〰️〰️🤩🤩🤩〰️〰️〰️🤩
— Я буду прикасаться к тебе до тех пор, пока каждая частичка твоего тела не станет моей…
❤️ Источник
⚡️ BOOST CHANNEL
🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩
#Рафаэль #арт #lads #loveanddeepspace #канал@LoveRafayel
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @LoveRafayel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,200,134 of 1,566,395entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@LoveRafayel named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@glubglubchat named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“RAFAYEL | Love and DeepSpace” (@LoveRafayel), 436 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/LoveRafayel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
