Channel
@Lothar_Merzhin
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
53subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003056278367 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Lothar_Merzhin |
| Created | 25 August 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Lothar_Merzhin |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 09:16 | 53 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:32 | 53 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 25 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (25 August 2025 – 28 July 2026) |
| Views total | 226 |
| Reactions total | 10 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 09:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
133 reactions across 16 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 58 | 43.6% | |
| ❤ | 40 | 30.1% | |
| 💯 | 21 | 15.8% | |
| 👎 | 6 | 4.51% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 3.01% | |
| 🌚 | 2 | 1.50% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 1.50% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 133reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 August 2025 to 28 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Il y a un scénario récurrent dans les films hollywoodiens depuis quelques années, (Exemple : les dernier Rocky, F1...), c'est le retour d'une vieille gloire retraitée de 50/55 ans croyant en avoir 35 aux affaires, venant mettre la patée aux jeunes, tout en prenant sous son aile un jeune nègre prodigue mais excessivement arrogant, qu'il éduque et forme. À la fin il raccroche, cette fois pour de bon, en adoubant le jeu…
👍4❤1
Mise à jour du lien par une version corrigée et augmentée
👍4❤1
Contre le campdufeunisme
❤3💯1
Il est à noter que de très nombreux gauchistes parlent du renvoi d'étrangers dans leurs pays d'origine comme quelque chose de similaire en faits à la déportations des juifs en camps de concentration. Cette comparaison impliquerait donc que leurs dits pays d'origine soient aussi agréables à vivre que des camps de concentration avec du grillage tout autour et des gardes partout. Les étrangers eux-mêmes semblent confi…
❤10💯3
Je fais certainement dans l'excès de pureté, mais je ne pense pas un seul instant qu'on puisse compter sur des étrangers dits "patriotes" ou des gens mariés à des étrangers pour mettre en marche une remigration. Non, vraiment, je ne crois être qu'un imbécile demandant une inatteignable pureté, tout le monde sait que des étrangers ou des personnes liées par leur femme aux communautés étrangères ne failliront pas à la…
👍6🔥2
L'Europe endormie et son ennemi américain
💯5
Aussi, tout récemment, le SPLC, grosso modo l'équivalent américain de la LICRA, est sous le feu d'une enquête du département judiciaire américain, notamment pour ses liens avec toute la galaxie des crasseux d'ultra-gauche poseurs de bombes. À cette occasion, on a appris qu'ils ont depuis longtemps financés divers indics au sein de groupes NS ou adjacents assez divers, avec notamment comme mission, à coté des activi…
❤7💯3
À propos de la propension des américains à produire du grand n'importe quoi sur le plan intellectuel, point de vue d'un américain : https://t.me/totallyawesomefriends/3019 Vu de l'étranger, on pourrait dire que l'américanisation d'une société Européenne (pas que, mais la plupart des sociétés non-blanches n'ont aucunement besoin de l'"aide"américaine pour produire des calembredaines politico-religieuses négatrices de…
En dehors du fait que Bouchet est un peu hypocrite, promouvant régulièrement Limonov (renseignez-vous un peu sur l'individu et vous verrez que ses mauvaises idées sont de loin la partie la moins pire de l'individu) et plus encore Douguine, dont la démence en 2026 fait pour ainsi dire la quasi-unanimité, y compris dans sa patrie, il a raison de souligner un phénomène assez navrant : l'importation régulière en France, …
👍7👎2❤1
Une curiosité éditoriale. La thèse de l'auteur est que « les homosexuels sont les véritables inventeurs du nazisme et la force motrice derrière de nombreuses atrocités nazies. » La maison d'édition Le Verbe Haut est d'orientation catho tradi et assez proche d'Hillard et de la dissidence psychiatrique. Ce qui est intéressant à remarquer, en l'espèce, c'est comment ces milieux recyclent en France des thèses qui ne s…
Plusieurs constats suite à l'élection de Magyar : -Un certain nombre de médias et influenceurs dissidents habituellement connus pour leur positions pro Orbàn et ayant soit ignoré, soit calomnié Magyar ont littéralement du jour au lendemain changé leur fusil d'épaule. Ce développement assez inattendu, et pose question sur la loyauté de ces personnes. Simple opportunisme de média dit "identitaire" et incapable de parl…
La défaite de l'illibéralisme orbanien
👏4🌚2💯2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Lothar_Merzhin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 983,485 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Lothar Merzhin” (@Lothar_Merzhin), 53 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Lothar_Merzhin.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.