Channel
@LondonBook
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
720subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001290456883 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @LondonBook |
| Created | 2 January 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/LondonBook |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 18:22 | 720 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:15 | 719 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:54 | 719 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 1 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 12 (1 June 2026 – 19 July 2026) |
| Views total | 225 |
| Reactions total | 14 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 02:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
215 reactions across 12 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 78.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 169 | 78.6% | |
| 👍 | 46 | 21.4% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 215reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 1 June 2026 to 19 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Возможно я об этом уже писала, но для новичков повторюсь. У Лондона есть свой мэр, а у Сити (исторического финансового района) - свой. Сити мэра зовут Лорд-мэр или Леди-мэр (да, в этом году у нас женщина) официально вступает в должность в ходе церемонии, которая столь же торжественна, сколь и древняя по своей истории. Церемония проходит в Гилдхол. Это совершенно прекрасное здание, и с точки зрения архитектуры, и исто…
❤14
Photo, posted without a caption
❤7
… готова была прощать в этой книге многое, пока не дошли до моего любимого дворца Элтам. И там, автор, он же известный лондонский гид, пишет, что архитекторы «перестроили» дворец «из средневекового в идеальное модернистское здание». Скажем так, Great Hall - средневековая постройка Эдуарда IV существовал, его отреставрировали и к нему пристроили отдельный особняк в стиле арт деко. То есть, дворец - это такой гибрид р…
❤9👍4
Рыдаю. Пока я тут в Ташкенте, поручила своему англичанину быстро выкупить билеты на гобелен из Байе. Он клянется, что упорно нажимал на кнопку, но билеты все ушли. Все билеты на ту самую выставку в Британском Музее, что откроется 10 сентября. Я хотела было обидеться, но увидела в соц сетях, что не только мы, но и все не успели купить. Ну как все, кто то все же успел. Экспозиция уже стала самой продаваемой в истории м…
❤11👍6
Хилари Мантель в одной из своих лекций сказала, что история - это не прошлое, а метод, которым мы упорядочиваем прошлое. Вчера мы с Nargiz Nasrullayeva-Muduroglu, Alex Dalinsly и еще сотней любителей английской истории пытались немного разобраться в прошлом и как спустя столетия изменился подход женщин в управлении. Три королевы, три судьбы, три стратегии управления. Спасибо большое всем кто пришел вчера, за интере…
❤18👍5
…. у нас небольшие сложности, билеты все разобрали, а желающих всё ещё очень много. Простите, если вам не ответили, мы не успеваем. На этот раз мы решили сделать иначе: приглашений мы никому лично не рассылали, объявление было открытым, в группе и в ФБ, и билеты разбирались в порядке живой очереди. По принципу, кто успел. Всей организацией мероприятия занимаются сотрудники ковркинг центра, за что мы им благодарны. …
❤15👍7
Как то певица Бьянка, когда в первый раз показалась на телеэкране, вся такая вот, открытая. Мой друг сказал: она уже всем все показала, что ничего то и не осталось для следующего раза. Так же и тут, вот посмотрите вы мой выпуск про Матильду и передумаете приходить на мероприятие по трем королевам. А с другой стороны, может я буду рассказывать то, что нельзя на ютубе вещать. (точно точно буду) https://youtu.be/mE6oomT…
❤13
Photo, posted without a caption
❤13👍3
Июнь Sherlock - мы до последнего надеялись, что спектакль отменят, потому что прогноз предвещал дождь, а представление немножечко так на Open Air. Обещали, что это «новая загадка», пьеса, написанная Джоэлом Хорвудом, на самом деле никакая не новая, а переделка романа Конан Дойла «Этюд в багровых тонах» (1887) и «Знак четырёх» (1890). Холмс был прекрасный, Ватсон раздражал тем, что вечно ныл, и весь спектакль завывал…
❤13👍3
Мы затеяли дерзновенное Secret Theatre: 8 июля Книжный Сомелье приглашает вас совершить путешествие во времени и встретиться с тремя английскими королевами. Мы узнаем как женщины у власти управляли в мире, окруженном мужчинами, какие полит технологии они применяли, нас ждут костры Смитфилда, колокола Собора Святого Павла, лабиринты дворцов, интриги а заговоры. У нас будет всего одна встреча, для которой мы с Алекс Да…
❤10👍6
Внезапно купила билеты в Ташкент. Прилечу с самый разгар жары. Планирую организовать встречу с друзьями/увлеченными/сочувствующими этому каналу. Привезу Матильд - это как мы с Alex Dalinsky называем мероприятие про трех английских королев, которое мы проводили в Лондоне. ИИ, история, женское лидерство и кое какой сюрприз еще добавим. Вернем Секретный Театр. Мероприятие будет на русском языке. Место проведения и дату…
❤33👍10
Photo, posted without a caption
❤13👍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @LondonBook. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 826,553 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“LondonBook” (@LondonBook), 720 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/LondonBook.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.