%🔠 [👕]:: 𝐋𝚘𝚌k𝔰𝔥𝔦ft ☎️• 𝐏𝚒𝚣𝔷𝔢𝔯ia 🎸𝐂𝚘𝚖𝚎𝔟𝔞𝔠𝔨 :: 𝐆𝐎! 공포 :: 🙏 🎁:: 죽음 🎇𝐋𝚊𝚢𝔫𝔢 ; 𝐌𝚊𝚒𝔩𝔲 ; 𝐙𝚊𝔯𝔞 🎧 [𝐖𝚘𝚛𝔩𝔡] • 𝐋𝚞𝚟’𝔡 ; 𝐒𝚞𝚗𝔥𝔢𝔢 💎 🥹 :🌟𝐌𝚒𝚡𝔦𝔫𝔤 — 𝐙𝚊𝔯𝔞 ; 𝐋𝚞𝚟’𝔡 🌺 ¿ “ 🥹 :: 🌟 𝐄𝚍𝚒𝔱𝔬𝔯 — 𝐂𝚛𝚊𝔷𝛾 “ 🎈[시체] • @Locksh1ft • 😈 𝐃𝚎𝚊𝔱𝔥
Channel
6 НОЧЬ 공포: 𝐋𝚘𝚌k𝔰𝔥𝔦ft 🔪 𝐅𝙽𝔞𝐅 ⌗
@Locksh1ftt
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
75subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003694351933 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Locksh1ftt |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 26 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Locksh1ftt |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 00:44 | 75 | no change |
| 13 Aug 2026, 03:02 | 75 | first reading |
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 26 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 3m 34s
- Average length
- 1m 47s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
44 reactions across 4 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5353051129527692655 | 11 | 25.0% | |
| custom 5321026122496896001 | 10 | 22.7% | |
| custom 5458704138143547136 | 6 | 13.6% | |
| custom 5321028368764792372 | 5 | 11.4% | |
| custom 5352672536750484706 | 5 | 11.4% | |
| custom 5321243632525665003 | 3 | 6.82% | |
| custom 5352738189620571587 | 3 | 6.82% | |
| custom 5458552676121851580 | 1 | 2.27% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 44reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 26 May 2026 to 4 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
?:: кстати нью эра будет там (спойлер)
6 НОЧЬ 공포: 𝐋𝚘𝚌k𝔰𝔥𝔦ft 🔪 𝐅𝙽𝔞𝐅 ⌗ pinned «?:: Мы приняли решение сделать ПЕРЕЕЗД на новый канал. Надеюсь мы сможем быстро набрать активную аудиторию. Если хотите продолжить за нами следить - вам туда С этого момента актив и посты будут выходить там, а этот канал будет больше для репостов»
?:: Мы приняли решение сделать ПЕРЕЕЗД на новый канал. Надеюсь мы сможем быстро набрать активную аудиторию. Если хотите продолжить за нами следить - вам туда С этого момента актив и посты будут выходить там, а этот канал будет больше для репостов
Sticker, posted without a caption
Sticker, posted without a caption
Channel photo removed
— Понравился интерактив?
- — Да, очень🌟84%
- — Ну такое 🌟16%
- — Наша кнопка (нажали - голос за «ну такое»)🌟16%
The shares total 116%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Sticker, posted without a caption
?:: наверно я еще приз (спойлер) должен выложить….но это я сделаю завтра и скорее всего уже не тут
——— 🎁:: 죽음 🎇 НОЧЬ 6 🎧 ——— — Вы сложили цифры и получилось 31.05….. Это же дата! Тоесть сейчас у вас есть — Soon , Comeback и 31.05! Пока вы все это решали уже прошла ночь. Странно что аниматроники вас не трогали. — На выходе из пиццерии вы выдохнули и пообещали себе больше туда не возвращаться…. — Поздравляю, вы прошли все 6 ночей! (к сожалению), вы огромные молодцы! Спите сладко….пока можете
custom 53210261224968960013custom 53210283687647923723custom 53526725367504847063custom 53530511295276926552
Sticker, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @Locksh1ftt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
— Понравился интерактив?
- — Да, очень🌟84%
- — Ну такое 🌟16%
- — Наша кнопка (нажали - голос за «ну такое»)🌟16%
The shares total 116%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 26 May 2026 to 4 June 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 617,040 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“6 НОЧЬ 공포: 𝐋𝚘𝚌k𝔰𝔥𝔦ft 🔪 𝐅𝙽𝔞𝐅 ⌗” (@Locksh1ftt), 75 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Locksh1ftt.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.