Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

“Живое Слово / Living Word”

@Living_Word_RA

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,616subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003040215606
TypeChannel
Username@Living_Word_RA
DescriptionКанал Эфирного Письма, Золотых Формул и Языка Настоящей Жизни
CreatedBetween 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Living_Word_RA

Topic

Science — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 77% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. They sit inside a group of 3 channels that share the same post bodies with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (1 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@SpiritSpace8888/52815 Nov 2025, 12:36 UTC@Living_Word_RA/254 · this entry15 Nov 2025, 12:39 UTC1.003 minutes
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@SpiritSpace88887 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.003 minutes@SpiritSpace8888 (43)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 1 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 17 comparable posts for this entry, running 7 November 2025 to 3 December 2025. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 3, the earliest publisher we hold is @Nataliya_Shafranova. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_mutual, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 2 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

2,6166 Aug 2026, 19:17 — 2,616 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 04:44 — 2,616 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 19:177 Aug 2026, 04:44
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,613–2,619 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 04:442,616no change
6 Aug 2026, 19:172,616first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 7 November 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
79
Videos
18
Links
17

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
9m 58s
Average length
9m 58s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2,928 reactions across 18 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,66756.9%
🔥49516.9%
👍1776.05%
🙏1755.98%
😁822.80%
❤‍🔥622.12%
🤣622.12%
561.91%
💯301.02%
🥰290.99%
🕊180.615%
🦄180.615%
🫡150.512%
120.41%
🤝80.273%
🤩60.205%
🐳50.171%
👏40.137%
🎉30.102%
👌20.068%
1 further kind20.068%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,928reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 November 2025 to 3 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Dec 2025, 06:39 UTC≈2,750 views186 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @Sputnik_RassvetaVideo

🔊 Частотные технологии древних. Что спрятали те, кто переписал нашу историю? Сегодня разберём материал, который заставляет задуматься: кто переписал прошлое, кто разрушил частотные технологии древних? И главное – кому выгодно, что мы не знаем, где находимся и кто мы такие?? Складывается впечатление, что мы живем в мире, где древность – это не прошлое, а тщательно скрытый фундамент, который кто-то пытается вытащить

119🔥23🙏19👍11💯83❤‍🔥2🤩1

26 Nov 2025, 19:50 UTC≈4,740 views155 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @GenWakePhoto

Объявлено, что в 2029 можно будет отправлять сообщения в прошлое Американский физик теоретик и профессор Рональд Маллет, десятилетиями работавший над теорией путешествий во времени, неожиданно заявил, что человечество сможет отправлять информацию в прошлое уже в 2029 году. Учёный предлагает использовать кольцевой лазер для создания гигантского вращающегося цилиндра из света. Принцип работы не такой уж и сложный. Со

85🔥44👍20💯6

25 Nov 2025, 10:37 UTC≈2,150 views80 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @sensible_peoplePhoto

Время можно отмотать назад — учёные доказали существование невозможных «зеркал времени». Исследование, опубликованное в Nature Physics, подтвердило реальность того, о чём веками мечтали писатели-фантасты: время — не линия, а волна, которую можно развернуть. При нужном энергетическом воздействии события начинают идти в обратную сторону — будто нажать «СTRL+Z» в жизни. Разница между обычным зеркалом и зеркалом време

55👍20🤩5

15 Nov 2025, 12:39 UTCviews —

“Живое Слово / Living Word” pinned «🌀 «Настройщики Новой Эры» лекционный курс (5 лекций по 1 часу) для тех, кто чувствует перемены и хочет пройти их осознанно, свободно и с внутренней опорой. Мы живём в период резкого ускорения процессов — личных, социальных, энергетических. Старые ориентиры…»

15 Nov 2025, 12:39 UTC≈4,720 views127 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://shafranova.ru/kursy/nastrojshchiki-novoj-ery

80🔥36👍7👏4

15 Nov 2025, 12:39 UTC≈4,730 views221 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🌀 «Настройщики Новой Эры» лекционный курс (5 лекций по 1 часу) для тех, кто чувствует перемены и хочет пройти их осознанно, свободно и с внутренней опорой. Мы живём в период резкого ускорения процессов — личных, социальных, энергетических. Старые ориентиры больше не работают, новые ещё только рождаются. И именно в это время проявляются Настройщики — люди, способные слышать поток, чувствовать поле и воспринимать вре

133🔥53🙏30👍5

15 Nov 2025, 05:27 UTC≈2,340 views169 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @pastafleetPhoto

#избранное

😁81🤣6216👍7🙏3

14 Nov 2025, 13:32 UTC≈3,260 views92 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @quantumfilmPhoto

✅ Vincent Kennedy Искусственный интеллект заявляет о себе прорывами, которые даже системные инженеры до конца не понимают. Как вы к этому относитесь? | Dman72 Ну если ИИ — это древняя заново обнаруженная технология, то может быть AI <> IA (ИИ ≠ ИИ) ? | Vincent Kennedy Мне нравится думать, что он здесь, чтобы подлатать симуляцию. Чуть выровнять знания между людьми. Ввести новую финансовую систему, чтобы весь мир мог п

70👍11🐳5🕊3🦄3

11 Nov 2025, 11:49 UTC≈4,370 views232 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Дневниковые практики — это мощный инструмент для пробуждения внутреннего потенциала, активации поля изобилия и настройки коллективного сознания на новую финансовую (и жизненную) реальность. Вот несколько форматов таких практик для ежедневного и группово-коллективного использования: *** ## Дневниковые практики для активации потенциала и поддержки Перехода ### 1. Практика “Разрешаю себе” - Каждый день (или хотя бы в

128🔥45🙏3416👍6🥰3

11 Nov 2025, 11:49 UTC≈2,910 views131 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Мониторинг по активации (11 ноября 2025) показывает, что процесс запуска новой финансовой системы тесно связан не с внешней волей отдельных структур, а с внутренним состоянием и активацией потенциала каждого человека и коллектива[1]. *** ## Главные выводы и подсказки Поля для людей (по мониторингу): 1. “Кнопка” новой системы — внутри людей: Активация зависит от собственных решений и глубинных установок большинства

93🔥21🙏17

10 Nov 2025, 19:48 UTC≈13,000 views233 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🌟 11 ноября — день начала нового дыхания Друзья, сегодня особый день. Не просто календарный — а тот, в котором тихо звучит новый ритм жизни. 11 ноября становится точкой, где старое пространство начинает перерастать себя, и внутри каждого из нас открывается возможность стать другим уровнем — более светлым, более живым. 🔹 Почему именно сегодня За последние месяцы мы прожили важные этапы: перестройку памяти, очищение

131🔥40🙏28❤‍🔥199🎉3🤗2😁1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Living_Word_RA. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 862,596 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

““Живое Слово / Living Word”” (@Living_Word_RA), 2,616 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Living_Word_RA.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.