بهشت لیورپولیا: 🔴 @Liverpooliran
❤26🤩2
Signed Admin

Channel
@Liverpooliran
On this record: Topic · Previous handles · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
12,075subscribers
-16,611 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001011888543 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Liverpooliran |
| Description | 🔴بزرگترین کانال لیورپول در تلگرام🔴 ☑️ از سال 1389 در سایت، از 1394 در تلگرام ☑️ ✅کانال توییت: @LFCTwitter 📽کانال تیوی: @LFCTV |
| Created | Between 1 December 2015 and 31 March 2016 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 64 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Liverpooliran |
Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Recorded in 2019 as “Liverpool لیورپول” — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 2 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @Liverpooliran/151023 · this entry14 Aug 2026, 16:05 UTC | @LiverpooliFC/1408114 Aug 2026, 16:29 UTC | 0.99 | 23 minutes |
| @Liverpooliran/151269 · this entry24 Aug 2026, 12:56 UTC | @LiverpooliFC/1468124 Aug 2026, 17:29 UTC | 0.98 | 4.5 hours |
| @Liverpooliran/154252 · this entry8 Nov 2026, 20:39 UTC | @LiverpooliFC/179169 Nov 2026, 06:46 UTC | 0.97 | 10 hours |
| @Liverpooliran/151031 · this entry14 Aug 2026, 20:09 UTC | @LiverpooliFC/1409614 Aug 2026, 20:45 UTC | 0.96 | 36 minutes |
| @Liverpooliran/154257 · this entry10 Nov 2026, 11:59 UTC | @LiverpooliFC/1796310 Nov 2026, 13:25 UTC | 0.95 | 86 minutes |
| @Liverpooliran/153941 · this entry3 Nov 2026, 15:11 UTC | @LiverpooliFC/177094 Nov 2026, 07:57 UTC | 0.95 | 17 hours |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @LiverpooliFC | 23 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 0.96 | 4.7 hours | this entry (21–2) |
| @Liverpooli_Newsir | 6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 0.96 | 6.2 hours | @Liverpooli_Newsir (6–0) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 8 of the 8 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 436 comparable posts for this entry, running 4 August 2026 to 10 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Nov 2026, 20:46 | 12,075 | -5 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 11:16 | 12,080 | -1 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 04:06 | 12,081 | -2 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 06:31 | 12,083 | -4 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 07:30 | 12,087 | -11 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 08:10 | 12,098 | -4 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 11:16 | 12,102 | -6 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 12:11 | 12,108 | -6 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 10:46 | 12,114 | -15 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 13:09 | 12,129 | -4 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 12:41 | 12,133 | -2 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 10:09 | 12,135 | -2 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 11:38 | 12,137 | -18 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 14:36 | 12,155 | -20 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 15:14 | 12,175 | -30 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 16:41 | 12,205 | -11 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 16:01 | 12,216 | -5 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 13:57 | 12,221 | -2 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 04:07 | 12,223 | +2 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 00:58 | 12,221 | first reading |
740 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 80 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 117 of 156 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 740 (4 August 2026 – 11 November 2026) |
| Views total | 188,679 |
| Reactions total | 4,947 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Nov 2026, 20:59 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 30 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
23,811 reactions across 631 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 9,560 | 40.1% | |
| 👍 | 5,928 | 24.9% | |
| 👎 | 3,428 | 14.4% | |
| 🔥 | 1,695 | 7.12% | |
| 💔 | 1,470 | 6.17% | |
| 😁 | 1,427 | 5.99% | |
| 🤩 | 303 | 1.27% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 636 of the 740 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 23,811 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 740 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Liverpooliran. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 740 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 11 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 5 of 156 posts held from the last 30 days (3.21%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
بهشت لیورپولیا: 🔴 @Liverpooliran
❤26🤩2
Signed Admin
🎙⚽️امیل هسکی، مهاجم سابق لیورپول: "هنوز جانشین محمد صلاح توی تیم وجود نداره، بهترین بازیکن برای پر کردن خلاء اون استوائو ویلیان هستش." 🔴 @Liverpooliran
👎23❤5
Signed Admin
با این انتقال موافقید؟ 🔴 @Liverpooliran
👎183👍114💔2❤1
Signed Admin
🚨🗣 ویرجیل فندایک درباره آیندهاش صحبت کرد: «اگر قراردادم تمدید شود، اتفاق خوبی است. اگر تمدید نشود، به تیم دیگری خواهم رفت. میخواهم به بازی کردن ادامه دهم و همچنان کاری را که انجام میدهم، دنبال کنم.» 🔴 @Liverpooliran
❤39
Signed Admin
💛 آپدیت جدید اپلیکیشن اندروید MelBet 🥇 🎁 کد هدیه 100 دلاری: giftcodeir 🤝 اسپانسر رسمی جام جهانی 🔵 کاملترین برنامه موبایل ☄️ صرافی معتبر 🤖 آموزش ثبت نام و واریز 🇮🇷 برای تغییر زبان برنامه، زبان موبایل خود را فارسی کنید. ✅ ورود به اپلیکیشن بدون فیلترشکن
Signed Admin
💛 مسابقات جذاب بسکتبال NBA را با آپشن های تخصصی در MelBet پیشبینی کنید! 🏀😀 🤐 مسابقات بامداد فردا 🤐 🆖 نیکز 🆚 کلیولند 🤨 🕖03:30 😛 رپترز 🆚 سلتیکز 🙂 🕖03:30 😇 بولز 🆚 اسپرز 🧐 🕖04:30 ❇️ باکز 🆚 لیکرز 💬 🕖04:30 🌎 سایت معتبر و جهانی 🙂😊😁👍 ┅━━━━━━━━━━━━┅ 💵 امکان شارژ حساب با انواع ارز دیجیتال 🔢 با واریز اول در ملبت 2 برابر شارژ بشید 🎁 قرعه کشی و آفر های جذاب با جوایز ویژه 🌐 دانلود مستقیم اپلیکیشن اندروید 🤝 اسپانسر رسمی لالیگا…
Signed Admin
🤩🗣آلیسون بکر درباره احتمال ماندنش در لیورپول: 🔻آره از نظر من خب دوست دارم بمونم فعلا تمام تمرکزم روی بازیکردن در تکتک مسابقاته اما واقعیت اینه که از موندن توی لیورپول خوشحالم. 🔻البته این موضوع به عوامل و شرایط مختلفی بستگی داره ولی خواسته خودم اینه که بمونم من اینجا خوشحالم و خانوادهام هم از زندگی توی اینجا رضایت دارن. 🔻هنوز برای کسب جام و ارائه بازیهای خوب انگیزه زیادی دارم میخوام تا جایی که میتونم در بالات…
❤30
Signed Admin
🚨🎙 ریو انگوموها درباره ترک چلسی و پیوستن به لیورپول: «احساس میکردم به یک چالش جدید نیاز دارم. لیورپول مسیر روشنی برای رسیدن به تیم اصلی پیش پایم گذاشت و به من گفتند اگر خودم را ثابت کنم، آینده بزرگی در انتظارم خواهد بود. برای گرفتن این تصمیم تردید نکردم و فکر میکنم تا اینجا مسیر درستی را انتخاب کردهام.» 🔴 @Liverpooliran
❤30🔥1
Signed Admin
اگه براتون مهمه این کچل چیکار میکنه الان به کشورای مختلف سفر میکنه و بازی های مختلفو میبینه 🔴 @Liverpooliran
❤24😁19👎2🔥1
Signed Admin
بازیکنان لیورپول هفته گذشته بهصورت گروهی از موزه باشگاه در آنفیلد بازدید کردند تا شناخت بیشتری از تاریخ و فرهنگ پرافتخارترین باشگاه فوتبال انگلیس به دست آورند. 🔴 @Liverpooliran
❤38
Signed Admin
آلیسون بکر در کنار همسرش در حال تمرین❤️ 🔴 @Liverpooliran
❤36
Signed Admin
🚨📊| بیشترین تأثیرگذاری در گلهای لیورپول در این فصل: 🥇 الکساندر ایساک و کودی خاکپو – 9 تأثیرگذاری ایساک: 8 گل + 1 پاس گل خاکپو: 3 گل + 6 پاس گل 🥈 فلوریان ویرتز – 7 تأثیرگذاری (2 گل + 5 پاس گل) 🥉 الکسیس مکآلیستر – 6 تأثیرگذاری (5 گل + 1 پاس گل) 🔴 @Liverpooliran
❤31🤩1
Signed Admin
Showing the 12 most recent of 740 posts we hold for @Liverpooliran. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
We recorded 7 posts on @Liverpooliran as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 7 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“لیورپول ایران | LIVERPOOL” (@Liverpooliran), 12,075 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Liverpooliran.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.