Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

🍻 Стас под пивас

@LiveStas

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

360subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001725943389
TypeChannel
Username@LiveStas
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/LiveStas

Growth

359360359.56 August 2026 — 359 subscribers6 August 2026 — 359 subscribers14 August 2026 — 360 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 359–360 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 11:29360+1
6 Aug 2026, 21:03359no change
6 Aug 2026, 14:04359first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 13 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
76.6%
avg views ÷ 360 subscribers
Avg views / post
276
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.05%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 6 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held19 (13 February 20265 August 2026)
Views total1,654
Reactions total26
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 21:03 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

128 reactions across 17 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥4938.3%
3325.8%
😁2116.4%
😭1410.9%
🙈75.47%
😱43.13%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 128reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 13 February 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 14:36 UTC133 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Вайбкодеры начинают и проигрывают Я тут активно играюсь с Claude Cowork и ChatGPT Work. Если на пальцах, то это штука, которая позволяет не просто в чатике общаться, но и крутить локальные файлики на диске. А ChatGPT Work, вообще следующая инкарнация Codex аппки. Что делаю: У меня есть пачка AI-трейсов, которые я просматриваю при помощи просмотрщика, который параллельно вайбкожу в Work. Две недели все шло круто, я

🙈7

4 Aug 2026, 08:44 UTC150 viewsread 6 August 2026
Poll

На каком языке вы в основном общаетесь с агентами?

  1. 🇬🇧 Ландан из э кэпитал оф Грейт Британ36%
  2. 🇷🇺 На русском норм60%
  3. 🔎 Не общаюсь / посмотреть результаты4%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

31 Jul 2026, 09:11 UTC234 viewsread 6 August 2026

AI-трейсы как UX-ресерч Вчера обновляли выпуск про UX-ресерчи под реалии AI. UX-ресерч – это когда ты общаешься с пользователями, чтобы понять какие проблемы у человека есть, как он их решает сейчас, или чтобы проверить, как твой продукт или прототип решает проблему человека. Там еще опросы и дневники есть, но не суть. Мы довольно долго мусолили разные инструменты, но забыли про самый главный из новых: AI-трейсы. Э

28 Jul 2026, 13:57 UTC244 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Среди русскоязычных подкастов, ну, помимо Подлодки конечно, я слушаю только «Горящий бензовоз» Обычно я их слушаю на скорости 1.8, но сегодня почему-то включилось на единичке. Я слушал и не понимал, что вообще происходит. Обычно заводные весёлые ведущие говорили уныло и как будто под кайфом. Всё починилось ускорением до 1.8. А ведь для кого-то и мы говорим быстро, весело, задорно 🙃 P.S. К слову, подкаст отличный.

5

24 Jul 2026, 09:06 UTC351 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

💸 Купил гревел Уже две недели катаю на новом велике. Купил себе самый дешевый гревел из нормальных. 🚴 Почему гревел Хочу летать по городу как шоссер, а мой любимый круг – через лесок с гравием. 💊 Колени Забрал велик и доехал до дома, что примерно в 30 минутах, на следующий день получил неприятные ощущения в коленях, и довольно жестко забил ноги. Думал, что необычная посадка, оказалось – высота сидухи. Уже вторую

7🔥1😱1

20 Jul 2026, 19:20 UTC542 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026

А вот и выпуск про SDD – https://t.me/podlodka/131761 Попробовал ли сам? Нет, конечно. За то последнюю неделю читал трейсы, один раз даже видел как BMAD используют. Но вообще был удивлен, что даже planning mode не особо.

🔥5

2 Jul 2026, 15:55 UTC413 views17 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Ну вот и все. Наша последняя поездка. Спасибо за всё, друг! Увели прям из под офиса, с шлемом и детской седушкой - ничего у людей святого. Завтра иду покупать новый. Думаю про гревел 🤔

😭14😱3

30 Jun 2026, 21:54 UTC361 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Вжух и мы с Егором записали 3 часа мощнейшего выпуска про Spec Driven Development. Отдельные лайки всем тем, кто просит от нас именного такого контента, а не обрезанные хипстерские Дип Дайв выпуски на час ❤️ Гость – создатель BMAD метода, который я тут обсирал. Мне объяснили, что я пытался построить скворечник инстурментами для проектирования города. Но инструмент прокачался, скворечники теперь тоже можно. Штош, над

11

29 Jun 2026, 13:25 UTC379 views12 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Сейчас прохожу опрос 360. Ничто так не радует, как лайки от коллеги за дела/проекты, о которых уже сам забыл.

🔥7😁41

29 Jun 2026, 10:13 UTC488 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Не думал, что мне настолько зайдёт OpenClaw Главный показатель, что продукт работает, что когда он ломается, ты чувствуешь себя некомфортно. Как раз на выходных несколько раз разваливался в рандомные моменты. Успел пострадать. Сейчас у меня такие сценарии: • Управление системой задач. Подготовка плана на день и неделю. Ревью по ходу дня. Поддержка задач в чистоте. Все в Obsidian. • Что-то умное поделать по крону (у

2

26 Jun 2026, 10:10 UTC352 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Силовые тренировки ч1 Послушал первую часть нашего главного спортивного хита. Немного открытий: • Сама по себе боль на следующий день – ничего не значит. Мышцы растут от растягивания, к сожалению растягивание приводит к микротравме. • Эффект от тренировки aka рост мышц держится 72 часа, потому если давать нагрузку реже – упускаем возможность для роста • Как я понял, нет никакой разницы между тем чтобы сделать 5 или 2

🔥5

22 Jun 2026, 09:25 UTC361 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Ищу себе бади для подтягиваний А тем временем с января скинул 10кг. В этот раз решил пойти без экстрима, а чтобы было больше мотивации – нашел 2х бади. Что делал: • Откручивал Apple кружочки тренировок и общего калоража. • Добавил дисциплину по еде. Меньше сладкого. Алкоголь убирал на месяцы. Это вообще грустно, что бокал вина(ну может два) в пятницу, и весь недельный прогресс – до свиданья. • Ежедневное взвешивание

🔥4

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @LiveStas. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

4 Aug 2026, 08:44 UTCAnonymous Poll78 voters

На каком языке вы в основном общаетесь с агентами?

  1. 🇬🇧 Ландан из э кэпитал оф Грейт Британ36%
  2. 🇷🇺 На русском норм60%
  3. 🔎 Не общаюсь / посмотреть результаты4%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 13 February 2026 to 5 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,140,128 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🍻 Стас под пивас” (@LiveStas), 360 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/LiveStas.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.