Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Little Nightmares Phoenix

Channel

Little Nightmares Phoenix

@Little_Nightmares_Phoenix

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

267subscribers

+17 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001466347252
TypeChannel
Username@Little_Nightmares_Phoenix
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Little_Nightmares_Phoenix

Growth

250267258.58 August 2026 — 250 subscribers9 August 2026 — 250 subscribers16 August 2026 — 267 subscribers8 August 202616 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net +17. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 247–270 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 13:46267+17
9 Aug 2026, 15:13250no change
8 Aug 2026, 22:01250first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
16.8%
avg views ÷ 267 subscribers
Avg views / post
44.9
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
8.79%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 9 of 18 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held18 (6 August 20268 August 2026)
Views total808
Reactions total27
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 22:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3m 11s
Average length
3m 11s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

27 reactions across 9 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1244.4%
🔥829.6%
414.8%
💯311.1%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 27reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 21:58 UTC2 viewsread 8 August 2026

اخرالزمان سوخته شانس زنده موندن: ۴۰٪ همه‌چیز از یک روز کاملاً عادی شروع شد؛ خورشید مثل همیشه طلوع کرد، مردم سر کار و مدرسه رفتن و هیچکس انتظار نداشت تا چند ساعت بعد، بیرون رفتن به یک حکم مرگ تبدیل شود. اولین اتفاق ساعت ۱۲:۴۷ ظهر گزارش شد؛ چند نفر که برای مدت کوتاهی زیر نور مستقیم خورشید بودند، ناگهان حالشان بد شد، پوستشان دچار سوختگی شدیدی شد، بیناییشان مختل شد و بعضی‌ها در عرض چند دقیقه چیزی جز خاکستر شناور در باد

Signed Phantom

8 Aug 2026, 21:42 UTC5 viewsread 8 August 2026

آخرالزمان غرق‌شده شانس زنده موندن: ۳۰٪ همه‌چیز از بالا رفتن غیرعادی سطح اقیانوس‌ها شروع شد؛ اول فقط چند سانتی‌متر، بعد چند متر، اما سرعتش آن‌قدر زیاد بود که دانشمندان خیلی زود فهمیدن این یک تغییر طبیعی نیست طی چند هفته، شهرهای ساحلی یکی‌یکی زیر آب رفتن و جاده‌ها، متروها و ساختمان‌های طبقات پایین غرق شدن، مردم به مناطق مرتفع فرار کردن، اما مشکل فقط بالا آمدن آب نبود؛ چیزهایی که هزاران سال در اعماق اقیانوس زندگی می‌کر

Signed Phantom

8 Aug 2026, 21:32 UTC7 viewsread 8 August 2026

آخرالزمان جهش‌زا شانس زنده موندن: ۳۰٪ همه‌چیز از یک تغییر فیزیکی غیرقابل‌توضیح شروع شد، اول فقط چند گزارش عجیب از حشرات با اندازه‌های غیرعادی منتشر شد؛ عنکبوت‌هایی به بزرگی یک دست، سوسک‌هایی که اندازه‌شان به یک کفش می‌رسید و زنبورهایی که تقریباً دو برابر اندازه‌ی معمول بودند ، دانشمندان ابتدا تصور کردند این اتفاق نتیجه‌ی یک جهش ژنتیکی محدود یا آلودگی محیطی است، اما طی چند هفته مشخص شد که مشکل فقط بزرگ‌تر شدن حشرات ن

Signed Phantom

8 Aug 2026, 21:21 UTC7 viewsread 8 August 2026

آخرالزمان ناشناخته شانس زنده موندن: ۱۴٪ در ابتدا هیچ اتفاق خاصی نیفتاد. مردم به زندگی عادیشون ادامه میدادن، مدرسه، اداره، گشت و گذار، مغازه ها و خیلی چیزای دیگه و هیچ نشونه ای از فاجعه‌ی جهانی وجود نداشت اولین چیزی که توجه پزشکان را جلب کرد، چند مورد عجیب از یک بیماری ناشناخته بود؛ آدم‌ها کاملاً سالم به نظر میرسیدن، هیچ تب یا زخم و علامت واضحی نداشتن، اما بعد از مدتی تغییرات کوچکی در رفتارشان دیده می‌شد، بعضی‌ها کمت

Signed Phantom

8 Aug 2026, 21:10 UTC8 viewsread 8 August 2026

آخرالزمان رباتیک شانس زنده موندن: ۲۰٪ همه‌چیز از روزی شروع شد که ارتش‌های جهان برای کاهش تلفات انسانی، کنترل بخش بزرگی از تجهیزات نظامی رو به سیستم‌ های هوش مصنوعی سپردن از جمله پهپادها، ربات‌های زمینی، تانک‌های خودران و سیستم‌های دفاعی همگی به یک شبکه‌ی مشترک متصل بودن؛ سیستمی که قرار بود فقط دستورهای انسان‌ها رو اجرا کنه اما یروز تمام سیستم‌های نظامی جهان برای چند دقیقه هم‌زمان از دسترس خارج شدن و وقتی برگشتن، دیگ

Signed Phantom

8 Aug 2026, 21:04 UTC10 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

نانای نای نیناش ناش

1

Signed Phantom

8 Aug 2026, 21:02 UTC19 viewsread 8 August 2026

آخرالزمان مه‌آلود شانس زنده موندن: ۱۵٪ همه‌چیز از ساعت ۴:۱۷ صبح شروع شد؛ وقتی مردم چند شهر مختلف هم‌زمان گزارش دادن که مه غلیظی بدون هیچ دلیل مشخصی روی خیابون ها نشست اول همه فکر کردن یه پدیده‌ آب‌وهوایی عادیه، ولی چند ساعت بعد مشخص شد این مه هیچ شباهتی به مه معمولی نداره؛ باد نمی‌تونست جابه‌جاش کنه، بارون روش اثری نداشت و هرجا می‌رسید، انگار مرز مشخصی بین «داخل» و «بیرون» ایجاد میکرد طی دو روز، مه بخش بزرگی از شهره

Signed Phantom

8 Aug 2026, 20:21 UTC17 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

پرایوت های گرامی! عزیزای دل، فداتون بشم قربونتون برم چنلتون بفرستین تو کامنتا من دریابم😀

1

Signed Phantom

8 Aug 2026, 19:58 UTC17 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

به نام خداوند پشم و پیله ۲۰ تا پابلیک ۷ تا پرایوت ، رواله فقط پرایوتا....🗿...لینکی چیزی میزی همینجا بدین امشو بشینم همتون بدبخت کنم جوابا قبلی میپاکم ، انتقال میدم

1🔥1

Signed Phantom

8 Aug 2026, 07:36 UTC383 viewsread 8 August 2026

⚠️ WARNING. WARNING. WARNING.⚠️ THE APOCALYPSE IS COMING. Get to the nearest shelter. NOW Do not go outside , Do not wait for further instructions ، If you’re reading this, you still have time ⚠️Challenge⚠️: Forward this message to someone, and I’ll guess what kind of apocalypse they’d end up facing and whether they’d actually survive it. As always, there’s no limit، Send it to whoever you want. If they’re still aliv

Signed Phantom

7 Aug 2026, 13:47 UTC42 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

اینو دانلودیدم داستانش تو سرزمینی به اسم پیول روایت میشه ، شخصیت اصلی اسمش کلیفه یکی از اعضای گروهی به اسم Greymanes همه چیز خیلی ارومه ولی وقتی گر‌وه Black Bears به Greymanes حمله می‌کنن همه چیز عوض میشه و تعداد زیادی از اعضای گروه کشته می‌شن و بقیه هم مجبور می‌شن از هم جدا بشن

🔥1

Signed Phantom

7 Aug 2026, 10:00 UTC42 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🔹خیلی‌ها فکر می‌کنن Tarsier Studios از همون اول می‌خواست لیتل نایتمرز رو بسازه، اما واقعیت اینه که همه‌چیز از یه پروژه‌ی آزمایشی تو سال ۲۰۱۲ شروع شد 🔹اون زمان، تیم سازنده روی ایده‌ای با اسم Dollhouse کار می‌کرد؛ یک نمونه‌ی اولیه که فقط برای آزمایش چند ایده ساخته شده بود، هنوز خبری از سیکس ، مونو، شهر رنگ پریده، مرد لاغر، لیدی یا حتی مائو نبود 🔹تنها چیزی که از همون روزهای اول توی ذهن سازنده‌ها وجود داشت، این بود که با

💯3

Signed Phantom

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @Little_Nightmares_Phoenix. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 21,881 of 1,481,346entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Little Nightmares Phoenix” (@Little_Nightmares_Phoenix), 267 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Little_Nightmares_Phoenix.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.