Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Shadow Hunts

Channel

Shadow Hunts

@LiterallyShadow

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

4subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002567679498
TypeChannel
Username@LiterallyShadow
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded13 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/LiterallyShadow

Growth

48 August 2026 — 4 subscribers13 August 2026 — 4 subscribers8 August 202613 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 5 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3–5 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 09:334no change
8 Aug 2026, 14:464first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 11 November 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
73
Videos
2
Links
174

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Recent posts

3 Dec 2025, 00:42 UTC18 viewsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @Alphakollswithins

5️⃣ SPOT LEFT FOR ENTRY That’s what a real private should be. Fuck waiting for someone to save you. Stay locked in with https://t.me/Alpha_judev

26 Nov 2025, 12:10 UTC20 viewsread 13 August 2026

https://pump.fun/AP1gZdVkRGCrNXcgtsMwfeBD2XvFPe2oWYofQngFpump

26 Nov 2025, 12:10 UTC16 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo

BZh67DVLEVED3oEPmdZxWBujDcseciXeSLkd2Hnnpump 🚀 $WOJACK price increased 11.8x to 209.4K 1st [12h] • @alpha_judev • $17.7K

26 Nov 2025, 12:10 UTC7 viewsread 13 August 2026

Market looks perfect to cook today energy feels right. Let’s see what we can flip

26 Nov 2025, 12:10 UTC10 viewsread 13 August 2026

Ca: yC4LtSGp7jaWv2mmjL8kBM5dWZj1VNQLiwPvH2hpump Chart: https://dexscreener.com/solana/JDDYpLFFTKHivp9NdcFx8cjM3t2uhffKkDQcuCywhB5b https://www.reddit.com/r/HistoryMemes/comments/16qmahy/historys_first_recorded_instance_of_a_wojack_meme/ viral on reddit while ago 12k upvote

26 Nov 2025, 12:10 UTC9 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo

$COJACK gamble play 9JvTKqhnSqJMEPLNwcbqP5cHJwVCS45Wv3Fimw2Bpump

26 Nov 2025, 12:10 UTC7 viewsread 13 August 2026

PRICE ALERT: 🚨 WOJACK is up 505% since Alpha\_judev's last alert 60 minutes ago Price now: $0.00011 | $112.0K 💰 Original Price: $0.000019 | $18.5K 💸 Dexscreener

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @LiterallyShadow. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 573,727 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Shadow Hunts” (@LiterallyShadow), 4 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/LiterallyShadow.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.