Channel
@LitRaksha
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
131subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001818540827 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @LitRaksha |
| Description | Жизнь и размышления простого редактора: о музыке, книгах и нас с вами. Пространство без мата, феминитивов и новояза. |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/LitRaksha |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 00:46 | 131 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:21 | 131 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 29 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
174 reactions across 19 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 56 | 32.2% | |
| 😁 | 37 | 21.3% | |
| 🔥 | 19 | 10.9% | |
| 👍 | 18 | 10.3% | |
| ⚡ | 10 | 5.75% | |
| 👏 | 8 | 4.60% | |
| 💯 | 7 | 4.02% | |
| 🤣 | 6 | 3.45% | |
| 🥰 | 6 | 3.45% | |
| 😐 | 2 | 1.15% | |
| 😱 | 2 | 1.15% | |
| 🤝 | 2 | 1.15% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 0.575% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 174reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 October 2025 to 17 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Увидела новое слово: «санаторинг». Как по мне, все эти «-инги» — лютый архаизм времен моды на «шопинг». Своеобразный показатель провинциальности увлекающихся этим «бьюти-королев». Ну ничего, огребут насмешек, да и успокоятся.
😁3💯2❤1
Signed Elena Raksha
Вчера владелица одного солидного магазинчика рассказала мне, как вместе с тринадцатилетним сыном спасала от уничтожения (как говорят — расформирования) небольшую библиотеку. И что теперь ее дом сплошь завален книгами. В том числе довольно редкими. И вот знаете, в последнее время я весьма оптимистично смотрю на будущее нашей культуры. Уверена, что она уже вступила в эпоху обновления и возрождения — не сама по себе, а…
❤10💯5⚡1
Signed Elena Raksha
Оказалось, это «закалённый». Тот, кто закаливается)
😁3
Signed Elena Raksha
«за коленный человек» Очень долго я думала, что бы это значило) Ваши версии?
😁4🔥1
Signed Elena Raksha
Песенка отлично разъясняет, как я провела праздники и послепраздничную неделю. Столько всего написать хотела, да сначала все некогда, а потом и неактуально вроде. Все эти поздравления, итоги года, надежды на следующий, которые никогда не сбываются... В общем, негодный из меня блогер. Поэтому без лишних расшаркиваний просто продолжу, как ни в чем не бывало. Одно только важное из прошлого года расскажу: я совсем отошл…
❤6🔥3😁2
Signed Elena Raksha
Сбылась детская мечта — познакомили с кумиром: Александром Пушным) Спасибо Inspector Guitars за это маленькое счастье) Очень дружественное к детям местечко, так что если ваше чадо страстно желает электрогитару — рекомендую брать именно там) Egor , тебе отдельное мерси, дорогой друг!
🔥9❤4👍3
Signed Elena Raksha
Хотела сделать картинку, где юристы запускают моховик, но дурацкие ии умеют только мухоморы рисовать(
😁3
Signed Elena Raksha
Снигери с Нигерии...
🤣5😁4👏1🤯1
Signed Elena Raksha
Все без исключения знают сказку «Репка». А мне очень интересно узнать, все ли из вас репку ели и знают, какая она на вкус?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed Elena Raksha
Photo, posted without a caption
😁4
Signed Elena Raksha
«Си биез» и «До миболь» — дочка постигает музыкальную грамоту 😂
😁7❤6👏1
Signed Elena Raksha
Составляла оптимизированный заголовок к статье про мужские драгоценности. Похоже, Вордстат безальтернативно считает, что самые ценные мужские «сокровища» — вовсе не золото и бриллианты))) И кто его только этому научил?) А, господа программисты?)))
😁5👍2
Signed Elena Raksha
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @LitRaksha. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Все без исключения знают сказку «Репка». А мне очень интересно узнать, все ли из вас репку ели и знают, какая она на вкус?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 October 2025 to 17 February 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@LitRaksha named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ЛитРа” (@LitRaksha), 131 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/LitRaksha.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.