Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Лисовой On Tour

Channel

Лисовой On Tour

@LisovoyOnTour

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

791subscribers

-9 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002111823812
TypeChannel
Username@LisovoyOnTour
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/LisovoyOnTour

Growth

791800795.56 August 2026 — 800 subscribers6 August 2026 — 800 subscribers6 August 2026 — 799 subscribers14 August 2026 — 791 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 8 days, net -9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 790–801 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 10:36791-8
6 Aug 2026, 19:30799-1
6 Aug 2026, 17:18800no change
6 Aug 2026, 16:41800first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 18 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
35.5%
avg views ÷ 791 subscribers
Avg views / post
281
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.35%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026
Posts held19 (18 July 20263 August 2026)
Views total5,338
Reactions total179
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 17:18 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

179 reactions across 19 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍3217.9%
2815.6%
🔥2212.3%
🤝2111.7%
👎1810.1%
🥰1810.1%
😁179.50%
💯73.91%
💩52.79%
😎31.68%
😱31.68%
10.559%
🆒10.559%
🌚10.559%
🍾10.559%
🤔10.559%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 179reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 18:34 UTC124 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026

👀 Вам тоже кажется, что резко скакнуло кол-во прям реально крутых голов в Первой лиге? Крутых – это сильных и с тактической, и с технической точек зрения. Да и комментарии тренеров о том, что нам нужен не только результат, но и футбольное наполнение, как будто тоже почаще стали слышать. Растём, получается. А Мурза из Велеса, кажись, гений, надо качать! ✈️ Лисовой On Tour

👍2🔥21🤝1

3 Aug 2026, 14:36 UTC239 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Сегодня потрындим про Первую лигу на Матч Премьер в компании уважаемых мужей. 😎 ✈️ Лисовой On Tour

1👍1🔥1

1 Aug 2026, 19:47 UTC183 views15 reactionsread 6 August 2026

😋 Прям искренне кайфанул с игры «Спартака» и «Енисея». Правда! Что понравилось: • Прикольный новый формат «Большой игры» – студийная работа, которая плавно перетекает в комментаторскую в сопровождении эксперта. • Экспертиза Никитоса Саламатова. В очередной раз убедился, что бывший профессиональный футбик видит игру по-другому. • Встреча двух тактических стихий. Уже прям максимально вертикальная «Кострома» и мудр

👍54🥰4💯2

1 Aug 2026, 14:14 UTC161 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

👀 Думаю, можно потихоньку начинать присматриваться к календарям европейских сезонов. 🩸 19 сентября сразу помечаем кроваво-красным. Кто понял, тот понял. 🫡 ✈️ Лисовой On Tour

🔥3🤝21🍾1

31 Jul 2026, 15:37 UTC287 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026

🇨🇳 РПЛ будут показывать в Китае. Это, наверное, хорошо. Ну уж точно не плохо, хоть какой-то иностранный рынок. Удручает только тот факт, что лига и клубы, видимо, пока не смекнули, что товар можно сделать культовым. Нужно только подписать куда-нибудь хотя бы одного китайца, пусть даже для галочки. Будет выходить на 10-15 минут раз десять за сезон и всё время числиться в заявках на матчи. Миллиардные (и это даже не

3👍3💯2🤝1🥰1😁1😎1🆒1

31 Jul 2026, 10:37 UTC185 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Йоу, смотрю заскучали? Держите порцию моей гениальности на очередной тур Первой лиги для Битвы каналов! ⚽️⚽️ Ленинградец - Сочи – 0:0 ⚽️⚽️ Нефтехимик - Текстильщик – 3:1 ⚽️⚽️ Кострома - Енисей – 1:2 ⚽️⚽️ СКА-Хабаровск - Урал – 1:1 ⚽️⚽️ Арсенал - Торпедо – 1:2 ⚽️⚽️ Волга - Челябинск – 0:1 ⚽️⚽️ НН - Шинник – 1:1 ⚽️⚽️ Уфа - КАМАЗ – 0:0 ⚽️⚽️ Велес - Ротор – 0:2 Спецпрогноз. Кол-во волевых побед в туре: 1 В турнирную т

2👍2🥰2🔥1

30 Jul 2026, 17:45 UTC716 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

👀 Забавно, но если прямо сейчас выглянуть в окно, на горизонте можно разглядеть самый чудовищный кризис в истории мирового футбола. По крайней мере, им попахивает. Коррупционные скандалы в ФИФА и локальных конфедерациях, развлекавшие нас в последние годы, кажутся детским садом по сравнению с текущей ситуёвиной. До вас же долетают новости о бойкотах ЧМ и всех турниров под эгидой ФИФА со стороны УЕФА, АФК и КОНКАКАФ?

👍4😱31🔥1🤔1

30 Jul 2026, 14:59 UTC203 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

🎙️ В эту субботу в новом для Первой лиги формате вместе с Никитосом Саламатовым комменчу «Кострому» и «Енисей». Поймал себя на мысли, что дичайше жду появления на поле парня с видоса. Вы уже в курсе, что «Спартак» намедни подписал Надера Мохаммади, который на весь год обеспечит клуб и лигу потенциально вирусными медиа-материалами. Да, костромичи возводят в степень свои базовые настройки. К Илье Мещерякову, способно

2👍1💯1🥰1

28 Jul 2026, 19:27 UTC217 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Правила футбола всё больше усложняются. От этого будут страдать лиги без ВАР. Сегодня комменты провели встречу с главой судейского департамента РФС Милорадом Мажичем. За сам ивент низкий поклон всем организациям, причастным к его реализации. Если вкратце. До недавнего времени в футболе был один ад, а теперь их как минимум два. К правилу об игре рукой добавилось минутное прозябание травмированного игрока за кромкой

😁4🤝3👍1🔥1

26 Jul 2026, 16:59 UTC238 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Что-то на утончённом. И даже изысканном. Первая лига, безусловно, прогрессирует в качестве футбольного контента. И даже не от сезона к сезону, а от полугодия к полугодию. Сильный и здоровый Михаил Игнатов сильно нужен нашему футболу!

2🔥2🤝1

26 Jul 2026, 10:04 UTC268 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🤝4🥰31😁1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @LisovoyOnTour. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 284,158 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Лисовой On Tour” (@LisovoyOnTour), 791 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/LisovoyOnTour.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.