Channel
@Liquidchain
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
824subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001577511379 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Liquidchain |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 4 December 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Liquidchain |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:05 | 824 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:17 | 824 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 4 December 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 March 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
We will inform everyone again once we are ready to do kickstart everything. Until then have patience and do not trust any domain owned by liquidchain. As they might take down their websites and we can't do anything until we have everything on our own.
DO NOT trade XLC in Pancake. Previous devs are trying to remove their liquidity which they provided months ago by minting unbacked XLC. The new team (community) are trying hard to find new devs and other people who can volunteer with a hope of bringing back the value that XLC lost. Previous devs also held bridge and we are trying our best to do something to return user funds. Don't worry you're not alone who lost mon…
Liquidchain Project will be taken over and rebranded. The old team is no longer working and we (from the community) have made a deal and will be taking ownership of everything of this project.
Farming Pools on BSC will be discontinued. Please unstake your LP from BSC farms. If you want to keep farming then move your assets to Liquidchain mainnet and farm there. Unstake LP: https://bsc.liquidchain.net/farms
ETH-XLC and BNB-XLC pools are now added in our farming pool. ETH can be bridged to Liquidchain from Ethereum and BSC, for BNB only BSC is available. FARM LINK: https://farm.liquidchain.net/farms
Liquidchain Network's Hydra Testnet is now live and fully operational. You can now do tests and experiments on our testnet before putting your codes on mainnet. Testnet Explorer: https://testnet.xlcscan.com/ Testnet Faucet: https://faucet.xlcscan.com/ Metamask: Network Name: XLC Testnet RPC: https://testnet.liquidchain.net/ ChainID: 5051 Explorer: https://testnet.xlcscan.com/ Claim free 100 test XLC from the fau…
Hello everyone, this is to inform everyone about unlocked XLC supply its allocation. Farming and staking pools have been funded with the unlocked coins. Farming: 5,000,000 XLC at reward rate of 0.80 XLC per block. Staking: 3,500,000 XLC at reward rate of 0.50 XLC per block. Next unlock will be on 1st July from development funds section. As we found shortage of XLC coins towards farming and staking, so we have allo…
Happy new year everyone. We hope everyone is doing well. Please try to stay safe at home as omicron virus is spreading faster across the globe. If your are from any of the hotspot zones please try to stay at home and keep your family safe and healthy. Once again we wish you all a very happy new year. We will refill the farm rewards by tomorrow and team will be fully active by 3rd Jan. Thank you
Hello everyone, Liquidchain team is happy to announce that bridge to Ethereum is live! You can now transfer assets between Ethereum and Liquidchain using the bridge. For now the bridge will support transfer of $ETH and $XLC between Ethereum and Liquidchain. You can start sending $ETH to our chain through bridge and get ready to farm ETH-XXX pairs. You can also use Liquidchain as layer 2 for Ethereum and trade $ETH i…
Hello everyone, this is to inform you that we have updated our website with a new version. This version is clean, superlight for fast loading and elegant in looks. Check out our new website and let us know how it looks and what more information we can provide on our website. Website Link: https://liquidchain.net/ Thank you guys and happy weekend!
Hello everyone, this is to inform everyone that we have deployed LiquidSwap Exchange in the dedicated domain ( LiquidSwap.org ). It will use the same contracts that have been used in the old version. Now users will be able to use all our products and access it under one single UI. Though we have kept our old swap page active and users can feel free to use our old version for swap if they want. Check out our new swa…
FTM-XLC pool is now available, you can provide liquidity in FTM-XLC pair in our exchange and stake LP token in the farm to earn WXLC. If you don't have FTM on Liquidchain Network, you can use our Multi-chain Bridge to bring FTM from Fantom Opera or Binance Smart Chain (BSC). Farm Link: https://farm.liquidchain.net/farms Bridge Link: https://bridge.liquidchain.net/ FTM Contract Address on Liquidchain: 0x3f7b1c547B…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Liquidchain. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 855,966 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@Liquidchain named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Liquidchain Network” (@Liquidchain), 824 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Liquidchain.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.