Channel
@LiquidationLive
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
52subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003954740872 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @LiquidationLive @whaleswallet |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 31 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/LiquidationLive |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 19:15 | 52 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 09:16 | 53 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 23:01 | 53 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:46 | 53 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:19 | 52 | first reading |
25 posts held, back to 10 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 25 (10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026) |
| Views total | 25 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 09:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
$25.2K $GRVT LONG liquidated on OKX @ $0.3606. another degen chasing grvt dreams on okx while the market decided to flex on longs. OKX $GRVT 30m: $39.3K OKX total 30m: $178.2K Market-wide 1h: $3.29M wiped $GRVT longs 1h: $108.8K wiped Pace: 1.7x prior hour
Liquidation.lol — 30m Market Flush $1.61M liquidated across all local feeds Longs: $1.28M (80%) Shorts: $323.1K (20%) Biggest single liquidation $152.3K ETH long · Binance Most rekt symbols 1. ETH $254.7K 2. BTC $203.3K 3. BMT $147.7K Top venues 1. Binance $1.22M 2. Bybit $182.2K 3. OKX $150.5K Market pace: normal vs prior 30m Updated 08/10, 17:41
$111K $FIL LONG liquidated on Binance @ $0.6985. going long on a red candle like its going to bounce back, bold strategy cotton. Binance $FIL 30m: $118.7K Binance total 30m: $1.25M Market-wide 1h: $3.39M wiped $FIL longs 1h: $125.7K wiped Pace: 1.9x prior hour
$116K $BTC LONG liquidated on Binance @ $65,125. another degen thought they could catch the falling knife and got handily rejected. Binance $BTC 30m: $187.7K Binance total 30m: $1.29M Market-wide 1h: $2.85M wiped $BTC longs 1h: $184K wiped Pace: 1.5x prior hour
$152.3K $ETH LONG liquidated on Binance @ $1,921. someone thought they were cooked when eth dipped below 1920 and their long got dusted like that. Binance $ETH 30m: $6.6K Binance total 30m: $558.4K Market-wide 1h: $2.78M wiped $ETH longs 1h: $185K wiped
Liquidation.lol — 30m Market Flush $1.86M liquidated across all local feeds Longs: $629K (34%) Shorts: $1.23M (66%) Biggest single liquidation $412.6K ETH short · OKX Most rekt symbols 1. ETH $427.5K 2. SPCX $375K 3. BZ $112.9K Top venues 1. Binance $955.9K 2. OKX $742.6K 3. Bybit $85K Market pace: 2.7x prior 30m Updated 08/10, 17:11
$68.7K $SPCX SHORT liquidated on Binance @ $137.40. spcx keeps proving that fading the dip is a profession for masochists. Binance $SPCX 30m: $161.3K Binance total 30m: $936.1K Market-wide 1h: $2.65M wiped $SPCX shorts 1h: $333.6K wiped
$29.9K $SPCX SHORT liquidated on OKX @ $136.57. shorting whatever spcx is supposed to be was basically begging the market to take your money. OKX $SPCX 30m: $143.8K OKX total 30m: $756.4K Market-wide 1h: $2.73M wiped $SPCX shorts 1h: $246.2K wiped Pace: 1.6x prior hour
$75.3K $SPCX SHORT liquidated on OKX @ $136.37. betting against the trend on a key support break was always going to end one way. OKX $SPCX 30m: $108.6K OKX total 30m: $703.9K Market-wide 1h: $2.81M wiped $SPCX shorts 1h: $196.4K wiped Pace: 1.8x prior hour
$412.6K $ETH SHORT liquidated on OKX @ $1,925. shorting into a green candle is a bold strategy that aged poorly within minutes. OKX $ETH 30m: $414.6K OKX total 30m: $571.4K Market-wide 1h: $2.57M wiped $ETH shorts 1h: $415.8K wiped
$84.1K $BZ SHORT liquidated on Binance @ $84.13. sometimes the market just lets you know. Binance $BZ 30m: $12.6K Binance total 30m: $729.9K Market-wide 1h: $1.94M wiped $BZ shorts 1h: $84.9K wiped
$99.4K $TIA LONG liquidated on Binance @ $0.3279. this is what conviction looks like when the market disagrees with you in slow motion. Binance $TIA 30m: $99.4K Binance total 30m: $684.3K Market-wide 1h: $2.03M wiped $TIA longs 1h: $99.5K wiped
Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @LiquidationLive. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,070,667 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Liquidation.lol” (@LiquidationLive), 52 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/LiquidationLive.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.