Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Link's Low Caps

@LinksLowCaps

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

519subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001682455495
TypeChannel
Username@LinksLowCaps
DescriptionPosting personal apes and risky low caps
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/LinksLowCaps

Growth

5197 Aug 2026, 09:51 — 519 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 04:03 — 519 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 09:518 Aug 2026, 04:03
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 518–520 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 04:03519no change
7 Aug 2026, 09:51519first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 7 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
27.3%
avg views ÷ 519 subscribers
Avg views / post
142
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.633%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 July 2026
Posts held20 (7 July 202630 July 2026)
Views total1,559
Reactions total2
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 04:03 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
162
Videos
11
Links
491

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

3 reactions across 3 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍133.3%
👎133.3%
🔥133.3%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Jul 2026, 06:03 UTC84 viewsread 8 August 2026

Maestro bridge is live for Arc!! Open the bot and type /arc https://t.me/maestro?start=r-sprigalyman

Signed TheSprigalyman - Rosecoin

23 Jul 2026, 10:00 UTC147 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://dyorswap.org/launchinfo/?id=0xd8a71378b88193fae1c4c6efb342fdc555d0bd43&chainId=988 USDT to $5 was crazy viral meme, might do good now stable volume

👍1

Signed TheSprigalyman - Rosecoin

17 Jul 2026, 23:44 UTC177 viewsread 8 August 2026

Sheriff of Nottingham is a wolf 0xc1dc86222229e2465366bf5dcbb5fa04f634b915

Signed TheSprigalyman - Rosecoin

17 Jul 2026, 23:04 UTC167 viewsread 8 August 2026

vlad posted memes and rwa, rwa is 2.5m og memes ?

Signed TheSprigalyman - Rosecoin

17 Jul 2026, 23:03 UTC155 viewsread 8 August 2026

‌‌‌‌‎memes (memes) HOOD $0.00001623 Price Volume B/S 5M: -45% $17.4K 80/83 1H: 393% $60.7K 324/226 1D: 287% $62.5K 332/243 MC: 15.8K | Liq: 11K ATH: 19.1K (1.2x) 1 week ago Age: 1 week | Holders: 43 Chart: /c_61ad24 DEXScreener | GMGN 0xFa11AF714E419bde37261535283bB9AA11355152 Top 10 Holders: 32.31% ($5.24K) └ 6 | 3.6 | 3.5 | 3.3 | 3 | 3 | 2.7 | 2.6 | 2 | 2 Holders P

Signed Proficy Price Bot

17 Jul 2026, 23:03 UTC117 viewsread 8 August 2026

0xfa11af714e419bde37261535283bb9aa11355152

Signed TheSprigalyman - Rosecoin

15 Jul 2026, 10:06 UTC124 viewsread 8 August 2026

https://x.com/0xnobi/status/1961656741709357390

Signed TheSprigalyman - Rosecoin

15 Jul 2026, 09:56 UTC119 viewsread 8 August 2026

Gambled with Grace at 1m 0x22e8e490ed1971e44f4ac9b0dc5810e80e9a1603

Signed TheSprigalyman - Rosecoin

15 Jul 2026, 08:40 UTC129 viewsread 8 August 2026

Bort got a reply from BNB after constant working for months https://x.com/bnbchain/status/2077295294761324738?s=46 Crazy to think if this is a meme it goes millions but a really good utility and it's only 2x from the bottom

Signed TheSprigalyman - Rosecoin

14 Jul 2026, 14:45 UTC169 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

$Cashkitten Looks like CTO on this, no good actual rewards runner for Cashcat, the higher ones are just distributing Noxa creator fees which are 0.1% Cashcat bounced well so this can do some good numbers 5/5 0xea58e3f89892cac6b6c9e1519c6acb29e6e87931

🔥1

Signed TheSprigalyman - Rosecoin

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @LinksLowCaps. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 749,988 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Link's Low Caps” (@LinksLowCaps), 519 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/LinksLowCaps.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.