Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Link Marines For Good

Channel

Link Marines For Good

@LinkMarinesforGood

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

183subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001276989004
TypeChannel
Username@LinkMarinesforGood
CreatedBetween 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live23 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 23 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/LinkMarinesforGood

Growth

183184183.56 August 2026 — 184 subscribers7 August 2026 — 184 subscribers15 August 2026 — 183 subscribers6 August 202615 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 183–184 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 01:15183-1
7 Aug 2026, 08:01184no change
6 Aug 2026, 17:10184first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 23 August 2022the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

25 Feb 2026, 23:22 UTC181 viewsread 7 August 2026

https://www.jbs.cam.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/2026-ccaf-tokenised-money-use-cases-interoperability-and-regulation.pdf

31 Aug 2023, 14:18 UTC≈2,510 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @chainlinkbreadcrumbsPhoto

SWIFT's latest report presents the most pragmatic path towards tokenizing all the world’s assets Rather than rebuilding the entire TradFi tech stack, they propose using #Chainlink CCIP as an abstraction layer to enable blockchain connectivity/interoperability

31 Aug 2023, 14:08 UTC≈1,930 viewsread 7 August 2026

https://twitter.com/swiftcommunity/status/1697233563601580353

9 Jul 2023, 13:14 UTC≈1,160 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @chainlinkbreadcrumbsPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

6 Jun 2023, 13:45 UTC983 viewsread 7 August 2026

https://www.swift.com/news-events/news/swift-explores-blockchain-interoperability-remove-friction-tokenised-asset-settlement

10 Feb 2023, 00:28 UTC755 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @chainlinkbreadcrumbsVideo

OpenAI's ChatGPT is just a Government run public front-end interface for what is actually a real (true) AI system they have had for some time and are now ready to unleash on the world. Chainlink will be the guardrails to facilitate the AI's control of us. HF marines.

21 Jan 2023, 13:11 UTC771 viewsread 7 August 2026

https://www.abstraction.capital/_files/ugd/4b8d26_e3873f4ac09d4a4bbf9785b2c32d5cb6.pdf

21 Jan 2023, 03:02 UTC674 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @chainlinkbreadcrumbs

Watch from 24mins and listen to the SWIFT CEO, it isn't happening in March/soon but they are moving their members into a messaging format/platform that later on can be interfaced with DLT and CBDC's. And he is making the point that once a CBDC launches, SWIFT will be able to immediately make it accessible for everyone else. https://jp.weforum.org/events/world-economic-forum-annual-meeting-2023/sessions/in-the-face-o

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @LinkMarinesforGood. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

13 Nov 2022, 19:49 UTCAnonymous Poll88 voters

Keep this channel as as or turn it into a small chat with Mods

  1. As is40%
  2. Small Chat w/Mods60%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 23 August 2022 to 25 February 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Link Marines For Good” (@LinkMarinesforGood), 183 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/LinkMarinesforGood.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.